Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
News Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
Author Message
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #41
RE: Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 02:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:01 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Huge difference between an aircraft carrying 500 gallons or less of fuel and one carrying 16,000 gallons or more as well.

Lots of planes out there with wayyyyy more fuel capacity than that flying without TSA security, but that's actually not really the point. Given we have studies out there showing the ineffectiveness of TSA practices, any would-be terrorist is likely to go the airline route anyway.

What is your opinion on TSA? Do you feel it's a restriction of liberties in exchange for security?

No. I've yet to see an Amendment to the Constitution that states flying on an aircraft is a right.
08-07-2019 02:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wmubroncopilot Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,027
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 132
I Root For: WMU
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post: #42
RE: Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 02:38 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:01 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Huge difference between an aircraft carrying 500 gallons or less of fuel and one carrying 16,000 gallons or more as well.

Lots of planes out there with wayyyyy more fuel capacity than that flying without TSA security, but that's actually not really the point. Given we have studies out there showing the ineffectiveness of TSA practices, any would-be terrorist is likely to go the airline route anyway.

What is your opinion on TSA? Do you feel it's a restriction of liberties in exchange for security?

No. I've yet to see an Amendment to the Constitution that states flying on an aircraft is a right.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.

Bottom line, you don't have to have a right specifically enumerated in the Constitution in that way. I would think you would know that.

There's nothing that specifically affirms our right to drive cars either, but we don't put up with (or shouldn't anyway) ridiculous security theater to drive across the country.
08-07-2019 02:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #43
RE: Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 02:45 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:38 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:01 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Huge difference between an aircraft carrying 500 gallons or less of fuel and one carrying 16,000 gallons or more as well.

Lots of planes out there with wayyyyy more fuel capacity than that flying without TSA security, but that's actually not really the point. Given we have studies out there showing the ineffectiveness of TSA practices, any would-be terrorist is likely to go the airline route anyway.

What is your opinion on TSA? Do you feel it's a restriction of liberties in exchange for security?

No. I've yet to see an Amendment to the Constitution that states flying on an aircraft is a right.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.

Bottom line, you don't have to have a right specifically enumerated in the Constitution in that way. I would think you would know that.

There's nothing that specifically affirms our right to drive cars either, but we don't put up with (or shouldn't anyway) ridiculous security theater to drive across the country.

No one is restricting your right to travel. You are free to travel anywhere you'd like.

But if you are going to fly you are going to be searched. Don't want to be searched? Use one of the many other means of travel available.
08-07-2019 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wmubroncopilot Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,027
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 132
I Root For: WMU
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post: #44
RE: Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:45 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:38 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 02:01 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Huge difference between an aircraft carrying 500 gallons or less of fuel and one carrying 16,000 gallons or more as well.

Lots of planes out there with wayyyyy more fuel capacity than that flying without TSA security, but that's actually not really the point. Given we have studies out there showing the ineffectiveness of TSA practices, any would-be terrorist is likely to go the airline route anyway.

What is your opinion on TSA? Do you feel it's a restriction of liberties in exchange for security?

No. I've yet to see an Amendment to the Constitution that states flying on an aircraft is a right.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.

Bottom line, you don't have to have a right specifically enumerated in the Constitution in that way. I would think you would know that.

There's nothing that specifically affirms our right to drive cars either, but we don't put up with (or shouldn't anyway) ridiculous security theater to drive across the country.

No one is restricting your right to travel. You are free to travel anywhere you'd like.

But if you are going to fly you are going to be searched. Don't want to be searched? Use one of the many other means of travel available.

Cool, so if I want to fly I have to waive my 4th amendment rights because.. reasons. Got it.
08-07-2019 02:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jjoey52 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,035
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 236
I Root For: ISU
Location:
Post: #45
Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 11:23 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:16 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:03 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 10:18 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 01:36 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

:)

I cannot express how happy I am about that developement...

To me, Harris is one of the least likable candidates in the Democrat Field - she right up there with Warren. Too much grandstanding and photo-op-ing and not enough governing for me.

She kinda reminds me of Ted Kennedy in how she asks questions and makes statements looking like she is disgusted with the person she is addressing and coming off as holier than thou - when we know a lot of their dirty laundry. Watching her question Kavanaugh reminded me of watching TK question Clarence Thomas back in the day....

Sitting in Judgement of others when you screwed your way up the ladder or drowned your girlfriend kinda stinks of hypocrisy.


I missed the one about the girlfriend, please share.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Google "Ted Kennedy Chapaquiddick" - that will give you all the answers you need

Wow. I'm 38, and I didn't think there was anyone in my generation or older that is unfamiliar with Ted Kennedy and the fate of his girlfriend. No slight intended here Joey, just curious of your age. I do understand that as the years go on and we are further and further separated from the days of "Kennedy Camelot" the information surrounding their history and dealings falls into the dust bins of history. That's a fairly big piece of the history pie to be uninformed on though.



My bad, when I read the post, I thought it said slept her way to the top and killed her girlfriend. I am educated about Teddy.
08-07-2019 09:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMUDunk Offline
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
*

Posts: 29,498
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1721
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
Post: #46
Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-07-2019 11:23 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:16 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:03 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 10:18 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 01:36 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

:)

I cannot express how happy I am about that developement...

To me, Harris is one of the least likable candidates in the Democrat Field - she right up there with Warren. Too much grandstanding and photo-op-ing and not enough governing for me.

She kinda reminds me of Ted Kennedy in how she asks questions and makes statements looking like she is disgusted with the person she is addressing and coming off as holier than thou - when we know a lot of their dirty laundry. Watching her question Kavanaugh reminded me of watching TK question Clarence Thomas back in the day....

Sitting in Judgement of others when you screwed your way up the ladder or drowned your girlfriend kinda stinks of hypocrisy.


I missed the one about the girlfriend, please share.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Google "Ted Kennedy Chapaquiddick" - that will give you all the answers you need

Wow. I'm 38, and I didn't think there was anyone in my generation or older that is unfamiliar with Ted Kennedy and the fate of his girlfriend. No slight intended here Joey, just curious of your age. I do understand that as the years go on and we are further and further separated from the days of "Kennedy Camelot" the information surrounding their history and dealings falls into the dust bins of history. That's a fairly big piece of the history pie to be uninformed on though.


Well, yea. But I think I read it as Joey May have.

I’m well aware of “my guns have killed fewer people than Ted”, but I read it as Knee-pads Harris as having disposed of a girlfriend.

Took me a second, then reread the “or”.

He may have cleared that up, just reading along
08-08-2019 05:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eldonabe Offline
No More Wire Hangars!
*

Posts: 9,695
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 1263
I Root For: All but Uconn
Location: Van by the River
Post: #47
RE: Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people's homes to confiscate banned firearms
(08-08-2019 05:13 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:23 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:16 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 11:03 AM)Jjoey52 Wrote:  
(08-07-2019 10:18 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  I cannot express how happy I am about that developement...

To me, Harris is one of the least likable candidates in the Democrat Field - she right up there with Warren. Too much grandstanding and photo-op-ing and not enough governing for me.

She kinda reminds me of Ted Kennedy in how she asks questions and makes statements looking like she is disgusted with the person she is addressing and coming off as holier than thou - when we know a lot of their dirty laundry. Watching her question Kavanaugh reminded me of watching TK question Clarence Thomas back in the day....

Sitting in Judgement of others when you screwed your way up the ladder or drowned your girlfriend kinda stinks of hypocrisy.


I missed the one about the girlfriend, please share.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Google "Ted Kennedy Chapaquiddick" - that will give you all the answers you need

Wow. I'm 38, and I didn't think there was anyone in my generation or older that is unfamiliar with Ted Kennedy and the fate of his girlfriend. No slight intended here Joey, just curious of your age. I do understand that as the years go on and we are further and further separated from the days of "Kennedy Camelot" the information surrounding their history and dealings falls into the dust bins of history. That's a fairly big piece of the history pie to be uninformed on though.


Well, yea. But I think I read it as Joey May have.

I’m well aware of “my guns have killed fewer people than Ted”, but I read it as Knee-pads Harris as having disposed of a girlfriend.

Took me a second, then reread the “or”.

He may have cleared that up, just reading along


My bad.... bad context. Regardless Harris sucks (pun intended) and Kennedy was a privileged douche who got away with a lot of bad sh*t.
08-08-2019 07:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.