(06-25-2019 10:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Regardless, my main point was the the OP's comments about dems was pathetic. Not to mention his thread title left a lot to be desired IMHO.

I would change "pathetic" to "accurate," but agree that the thread title may have been over the top.

(06-25-2019 12:50 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Regardless, my main point was the the OP's comments about dems was pathetic. Not to mention his thread title left a lot to be desired IMHO.

I would change "pathetic" to "accurate," but agree that the thread title may have been over the top.

I know you would. Of course you can always cite all the evidence of democrats advocating for ISIS fighters to be welcomed into the US with open arms any time you feel free.

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

First, it's a lie that you're not allowed to post something that's not ironclad true with the supporting evidence. If that were the case, there are hundreds of threads on Russia that would have been closed. Such obvious false statements doesn't help your credibility.

Second, you seem to have admitted that The DHS produced a report... and that Mexican officials HAVE disseminated it... that 3 ISIS linked suspects are believed to be heading to the US border.

If you're going to draw semantics about 'believed to be headed' vs 'headed'... um... okay.... but that seems awfully pedantic.... and more to the point.... the OP is EXACTLY what the source said it said.

which is why you argued with the source initially.

But that still raises a different question...
You first said that the source couldn't be trusted... and that they were the only ones reporting it...

So if they're the ONLY source of this story that you later admit is TRUE.... What do you expect people to do? iirc, The National Enquirer was the first to release the Edwards story... Blind Squirrels and nuts to be certain... but even if I accept your clearly flawed initial premise, you're still holding to it despite admitting that it MEETS those criteria.

(06-25-2019 08:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Breitbart News: “We cover the crap FoxNews won’t”

Mainstream News Outlets: "We cover the Fake News crap that Fox News won't".

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

(06-25-2019 05:25 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Well, I dunno about anybody else but I can hear the backup alarm from Tanker 61 from here.

(06-25-2019 08:26 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:22 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Breitbart News: “We the crap FoxNews won’t”

Is English your fourth language?

I do speak 3 languages... English being one...but not 4.

I do admit to needing glasses, too. My vision is not what it used to be.

Your composition isn’t what it used to be either.

The snippet of Mensa quality thought you brought to us isn’t even up to your English composition.

(06-25-2019 08:51 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:37 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:26 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:22 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 08:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Breitbart News: “We the crap FoxNews won’t”

Is English your fourth language?

I do speak 3 languages... English being one...but not 4.

I do admit to needing glasses, too. My vision is not what it used to be.

LOL.

Next question... how do you consider a confirmed, non-U.S. report of ISIS members potentially making their way to the U.S. crap?

From simply reading the Breitbart story...
The “report” was generated by the Trump administration’s DHS and then forwarded to Mexico. Mexican officials then disseminated the information, which Breitbart exclusively published as news.

Sounds a lot like the FBI’s investigation and surveillance of Trump. How come you can’t figure that out?

(06-25-2019 09:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 09:34 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 09:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2019 10:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Democrats will be welcoming them with open arms....

Quote:Welp, this is pretty damn disconcerting.

But go ahead, Democrats, tell us how racist Americans are for wanting our borders secured.

ISIS.

Awesome.

Link

What a crap thread/post. First, Mexican officials aren't confirming people are headed to the border per your dubious cite from Breitbart. Breitbart is only claiming that Mexican officials confirm they were warned by US officials. And why would we start believing anything from Breitbart now anyway?

Lastly, your comments about being welcomed are just plain pathetic.

Slip a 'lil stupid in your coffee this morning instead of sugar?

https://www.krgv.com/news/3-suspected-is...-nicaragua

Why would we believe it? Well... because the three of them were arrested yesterday in Nicaragua, per the updated link SuperFly posted right above yours.

Never drank an ounce of coffee in my life. Still waiting on proof they were heading to the US border......

BTW - Didn't trump already defeat ISIS?

Waiting on lame Obama JV post.....

Quote:”

The Black Knight is a fictional character who appears in a scene of the feature film Monty Python and the Holy Grail. As his name suggests, he is a knight dressed in black and behaves similarly to the standard character, a black knight. He guards a "bridge" (in reality a short plank of wood) over a small stream — which could have been easily stepped over by King Arthur but, for unknown reasons, he does not. Although supremely skilled in swordplay, the Black Knight suffers from unchecked overconfidence and a staunch refusal ever to give up.”

(06-26-2019 06:34 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 09:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 09:34 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 09:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2019 10:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Democrats will be welcoming them with open arms....


Link

What a crap thread/post. First, Mexican officials aren't confirming people are headed to the border per your dubious cite from Breitbart. Breitbart is only claiming that Mexican officials confirm they were warned by US officials. And why would we start believing anything from Breitbart now anyway?

Lastly, your comments about being welcomed are just plain pathetic.

Slip a 'lil stupid in your coffee this morning instead of sugar?

https://www.krgv.com/news/3-suspected-is...-nicaragua

Why would we believe it? Well... because the three of them were arrested yesterday in Nicaragua, per the updated link SuperFly posted right above yours.

Never drank an ounce of coffee in my life. Still waiting on proof they were heading to the US border......

BTW - Didn't trump already defeat ISIS?

Waiting on lame Obama JV post.....

Quote:”

The Black Knight is a fictional character who appears in a scene of the feature film Monty Python and the Holy Grail. As his name suggests, he is a knight dressed in black and behaves similarly to the standard character, a black knight. He guards a "bridge" (in reality a short plank of wood) over a small stream — which could have been easily stepped over by King Arthur but, for unknown reasons, he does not. Although supremely skilled in swordplay, the Black Knight suffers from unchecked overconfidence and a staunch refusal ever to give up.”

perfect.

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:43 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  So we went from it was fake news to nope it is real story. And then they were not heading this way.
Surely they would have stayed in Nicaragua for the excellent socialist economy there. LOL

Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

And MSNBC and CNN don't? What's good for the goose...

(06-25-2019 11:46 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

(06-26-2019 08:17 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:43 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  So we went from it was fake news to nope it is real story. And then they were not heading this way.
Surely they would have stayed in Nicaragua for the excellent socialist economy there. LOL

Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

And MSNBC and CNN don't? What's good for the goose...

Both of those outlets engage often in partisan reporting. Never said otherwise. Move along.

(06-26-2019 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 11:46 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

You do understand it was a linked story whose headline is word for word this thread title, right?

(06-26-2019 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 11:46 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry that I live in a fact-based reality. When I see the evidence they were headed here I'll gladly accept it. And I never said it was fake news. Just that Breitbart has a track record of nonsense.

Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

LeftwingTom ... "Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence". Those are your words.

Where is your "100% ironclad truth and supporting evidence" that Trump assaulted the woman in 1995 that you posted about? Those are your self proclaimed standards (so you say). You didn't say that you were OK posting something that was a "news story worth posting" even though there is ZERO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE which is exactly what you did. Can you not see the HUGE difference between those two things? That's why I called you out on your 100% inaccurate statement and provided the supporting evidence.

(06-26-2019 11:23 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-26-2019 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 11:46 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 10:58 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  Tom
Do you seriously think that they had a 'destination' in mind OTHER than here?

Do you have an alarm on your home or car? Do you wait to have proof that someone wants to break into it before setting the alarm? That may not be the best analogy, but it's close enough.

The odds that they went there so that they could come here are VERY high. We can debate the word 'very', but it's certainly well into the double digits... We are certainly on their shopping list.

No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

LeftwingTom ... "Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence". Those are your words.

Where is your "100% ironclad truth and supporting evidence" that Trump assaulted the woman in 1995 that you posted about? Those are your self proclaimed standards (so you say). You didn't say that you were OK posting something that was a "news story worth posting" even though there is ZERO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE which is exactly what you did. Can you not see the HUGE difference between those two things? That's why I called you out on your 100% inaccurate statement and provided the supporting evidence.

Perhaps you can show me exactly where I said he did rape her? I'll hang up and wait......

Here's the thread: https://csnbbs.com/thread-877991.html I used "allegation" in the thread title and added no additional commentary on the veracity of the claim.

(06-26-2019 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

No, this is not the standard that has been applied to you... at least not by me or anyone i know... Why you would spend so much time addressing those who address you that way, I don't know.

The OP linked and quoted the article, including the headline AND the comment that they believed they may be coming here. If you want to take issue with the report, that's fine... but your feigned 'i don't have a clue' is just that. You have a clue, you're just being obstinate to try and make a point, unrelated to the topic.

Quote:Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

Odd that you complain about what others do, while you did this to them first here,

I'd say that ISIS in Mexico right now is much more newsworthy than an alleged rape some 25 years ago, long past the SOL. It's certainly tabloid worthy, but that's all that it is. You claimed this wasn't newsworthy and are calling people who say the same about a 25 yr old allegation are asinine?

Get real Tom

(06-26-2019 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-26-2019 11:23 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-26-2019 10:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 11:46 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(06-25-2019 12:40 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  No clue, and not the point. Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence. The OP did not meet that standard in my opinion. I'm just playing in the sandbox you guys demanded of me. If you don't like it, tough ****.

That's BS!!!

Someone states that, "Mexican Officials Confirm 3 ISIS-linked Suspects Headed To U.S. Southern Border" and you cry that the "standard of proof" wasn't met for you to accept it.

On the other hand someone states that Trump raped or attempted to rape them in a very public place back in 1995 (with no evidence to back up the claim) and you not only see the "standard of proof" as being met, you start the topic for the postings on it.

Two things, the OP provided NO proof that these guys were headed to the US. Certainly they could have been, but don't say it if you can't prove it, right? That's what I've always been told here. I sure you feel differently and that's fine. But just apply the same standrd to me then, k?

Second, nowhere did I say I believed the woman accusing trump of rape as I have no way of knowing. But to deny that it's not a news story worth posting on here is asinine at best.

LeftwingTom ... "Sorry, but I've been conditioned here for years that you aren't allowed to post anything that's not 100% ironclad true with the supporting evidence". Those are your words.

Where is your "100% ironclad truth and supporting evidence" that Trump assaulted the woman in 1995 that you posted about? Those are your self proclaimed standards (so you say). You didn't say that you were OK posting something that was a "news story worth posting" even though there is ZERO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE which is exactly what you did. Can you not see the HUGE difference between those two things? That's why I called you out on your 100% inaccurate statement and provided the supporting evidence.

Perhaps you can show me exactly where I said he did rape her? I'll hang up and wait......

Here's the thread: https://csnbbs.com/thread-877991.html I used "allegation" in the thread title and added no additional commentary on the veracity of the claim.

So you admit then that you don't have any idea if it is true, and you didn't have any supporting evidence to support your article ...... *Mic Drop*

Look Leftwing .... no one on here has stated those to be the requirements for posting on the boards. I'm merely calling you out because you stated - and I showed you your own words - that you did follow those lofty standards (and you don't). Dance around the facts, spin it to the left and the right, do whatever you want. It won't change that.