Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
News Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
Author Message
BuffaloTN Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,391
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 293
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
What a sad life you live Mach.
05-30-2019 06:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Online
Ban bans
*

Posts: 42,489
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 1589
I Root For: truffles
Location: is everything
Post: #62
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
(05-30-2019 06:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Most effective President in the eyes of one party. He’s been disastrous for the deficit. What has been his greatest accomplishment? Hell list any accomplishment. You do realize the yield curve inverted on the 23rd of May. Always a sign of recession. The tax cuts poll negatively. He’s a con man at the best.

If he didn't do one single thing beyond the SCOTUS appointments I'm happy. But, any one not known as a fool understands how much better the economy is now than two years ago. As for the deficit, are you really going there after what Obama did to it?? Really? You may be acting foolish but you aren't stupid, open your eyes.

From Marketwatch: "Mind you, Ashworth is not predicting the sudden onset of recession. Nor are other economists.".

"What’s keeping the economy afloat despite trade and other headwinds?

The strong labor market, for one thing. Layoffs and unemployment remain near a 50-year low, and even if companies aren’t hiring as rapidly as they were last fall, they aren’t resorting to mass job cuts, either.

“The U.S. still has a rock solid labor market,” said chief economist Scott Anderson of Bank of the West.""

I guess if those numbers dip to Obama era levels you may say you were right. But then I have to ask why you would appear to be cheering for a recession.
05-30-2019 07:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 16,186
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 992
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Pennsylvania

Survivor Champion
Post: #63
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
Only a report from Morgan Stanley that's being reported by CNBC is the only thing I could find showing that.. I had to google it myself. I'm glad Mach changed the subject and then didn't post links.
05-30-2019 07:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eldonabe Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,179
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 145
I Root For: All but Uconn
Location: Van by the River
Post: #64
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
(05-30-2019 06:18 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(05-29-2019 03:56 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  I am not posting this to defend Trump - I am also not here to indict the guy either.


If I really sit back and look at this whole thing (and what Mueller had to say today) as objectively as I can, this is how I would summarize it:

- Mueller's primary objective was to see if the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to rig the election. It sounds very much like Trump did not do so, however, there was plenty of compelling evidence that Russia did try to push things in one direction or the other. Without saying it - he basically said that you are all missing the point here - RUSSIA WAS F-ING with our election!!!!!! But it was not in the way the Dems had hoped they were.

- In the process of the investigation he came across many other wrongdoings. As a law man, I would think he would be compelled to pursue those things if he became aware of them, and it looks like he did that.

- It does seem that Trump was at the very least trying to divert Mueller and at the very most block Mueller from things. He has stated as clearly as anything that he said today, that his report includes his entire account of those actions and it was up to those who have the real power to act on those findings to do so if they choose.

- Nadler is really walking on a fine line and so is Pelosi. They are playing off of each other right now as each other's excuse to basically not actually do anything, but sound like they really are. It stuns me that ZERO dems have looked at the unredacted Mueller report and briefed their peers. They can see it, but for some reason they choose not to?




The dems are in a really bad spot here. There seems to be smoke but they cannot find the fire. If they go all in on impeachment and lose, their party will get pummeled in the next round of elections and the Republicans will railroad every bag of anti-democrat policy schidt they can, so that it will take a decade or more to reverse it if they every get the chance again.

I have said it before and I will continue to say it. I am a republican at heart (and by registration) but I will vote for the best candidate when someone proves to be one, regardless of party lines - if it is a tie, I go by party lines - even if I have to hold my nose while I pull that lever. It is my humble opinion that many many people vote the same way. The dems are fumbling on this in a big way. Trump is the second most unelectable person who has run for that office in my lifetime and as of right now, the dems still cannot put up somebody who can beat that?

Meh, maybe so but aside from Reagan I bet he's the single most effective POTUS in our lifetime. Almost every other one's primary objective seemed to be maintaining the status quo.

For clarification I said unelectable PERSON. I think he has just as many qualified business/political characteristics as anyone else - even Hillary does.

But as a human being - he just rubs too many people the wrong way with his verbal bullying words, constant bragging, and less than politically correct presentation etc.... People don't like him because he is a dick, not because of his politics.


Ironically, that is the best and worst thing about the guy. He has riled up the everyone in the establishment - which needed to happen. The dems still don't know how to deal with it. Rather than roll up their sleeves and actually do something for the people they represent to reclaim their trust and votes, they are acting like f-ing 8 year-olds holding their breath and stomping their feet. They are teeing up the election for Trump and they are just too damn stupid and stubborn to see it.

I think Pelosi may actually get it, but she just has soooo many headwinds she cannot get the rest of them to see the bigger picture. She is trying to appease the extreme to hold the entire party together, but it is only serving to divide them further as the angry mob is making far more noise than the calculating, strategic moderates.
05-30-2019 08:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagleaidaholic Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,310
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 94
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #65
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
(05-29-2019 03:24 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  It wasn't Mueller's responsibility to decide whether or not the President can be indicted. It was his responsibility to do an investigation and report the findings to the DOJ(AG). They they/he decides whether or not indictments are handed down. He found nothing. Wasted $35mill and destroyed people's lives in the process who had done nothing wrong until the Govt. broke them while they were trying to prove it. Some even went to jail after going broke. Karma will hit Mueller and his crew hard.
Just came across this from a few months back. From Mueller's performance in front of Congress a few weeks back I would say the Ho, Karma has made a visit to Mr. Mueller. Because I am pretty sure he didn't know what day it was.
08-13-2019 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 16,186
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 992
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Pennsylvania

Survivor Champion
Post: #66
RE: Why Mueller doesnt want to testify
I don't push the podcast alot here cause I listen to it every now and then, but Dan Bongino made a good point on Friday regarding this whole CF.

Basically this whole sham is nothing more than a movie script written 12 years ago by Glenn Simpson. He published it in an article for the New Yorker. They used Steele for credibility in name only.. The only thing was you had to have someone play the bad guy, enter DJT. Now you have to connect the people in the script to the villain.. If along the way you find a crime, prosecute them, even if it has nothing to do with the case at hand, it'll keep it fresh on people's mind and helps the left drive home the fact there was collusion.

It's interesting.. Go have a listen..
08-13-2019 12:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2019 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2019 MyBB Group.