BOOM! Take that, zuckerberg!

What a joke. Read the comments, it's just all leftists talking about how they're going to flood it with nonsense.

This president's unwillingness to act on this issue will be his demise. I can already see him pacing the WH in 2020, crying to do-nothing brad parscale, when his tweets are being sent into the abyss and never gain any traction, because all of the network nodes that spread his message in 2016 were systematically expunged from the mainstream internet and are long gone.

Lame.

Mr. 24/7 social media president is complaining about the social media that got him elected. Does he ever take personal responsibility about anything?

(05-15-2019 09:48 PM)Kronke Wrote:  BOOM! Take that, zuckerberg!

What a joke. Read the comments, it's just all leftists talking about how they're going to flood it with nonsense.

This president's unwillingness to act on this issue will be his demise. I can already see him pacing the WH in 2020, crying to do-nothing brad parscale, when his tweets are being sent into the abyss and never gain any traction, because all of the network nodes that spread his message in 2016 were systematically expunged from the mainstream internet and are long gone.

Uh, didn't he just act with this?

(05-15-2019 11:06 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Lame.

Mr. 24/7 social media president is complaining about the social media that got him elected. Does he ever take personal responsibility about anything?

No you effin maroon, he's complaining about social media banning conservative voices from their platforms. When the pendulum swings back, as it inevitably does, such bias could impact you. I bet you won't be making fun of anyone then,

(05-16-2019 06:10 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:06 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Lame.

Mr. 24/7 social media president is complaining about the social media that got him elected. Does he ever take personal responsibility about anything?

No you effin maroon, he's complaining about social media banning conservative voices from their platforms. When the pendulum swings back, as it inevitably does, such bias could impact you. I bet you won't be making fun of anyone then,

Those idiots would not have been banned if they read the Terms of Agreements that you signed up agreeing too. Under the law? The social media companies have a contract that you agree to which protects them from frivilious lawsuits and slanders from the ones banned or from the President. Even under law, they are protected from Elizabeth Warren as well.

Whatever happened to the other website or hotline trump created for Republicans to cry on?

(05-16-2019 06:21 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:10 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:06 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Lame.

Mr. 24/7 social media president is complaining about the social media that got him elected. Does he ever take personal responsibility about anything?

No you effin maroon, he's complaining about social media banning conservative voices from their platforms. When the pendulum swings back, as it inevitably does, such bias could impact you. I bet you won't be making fun of anyone then,

Those idiots would not have been banned if they read the Terms of Agreements that you signed up agreeing too. Under the law? The social media companies have a contract that you agree to which protects them from frivilious lawsuits and slanders from the ones banned or from the President. Even under law, they are protected from Elizabeth Warren as well.

Let's be honest. It's hard to take Facebook at face value (pun intended) when they use that "terms of agreement" to ban someone like Paul Joseph Watson all the while allowing things like jihad pages and blatantly Anti-Trump pages who are guilty of much worse.

Even if PJW violated terms, it looks bad when he gets banned while others are allowed who just happen to have a left viewpoint.

Bad Optics and has a whiff of bias and hypocrisy.

(05-16-2019 06:08 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 09:48 PM)Kronke Wrote:  BOOM! Take that, zuckerberg!

What a joke. Read the comments, it's just all leftists talking about how they're going to flood it with nonsense.

This president's unwillingness to act on this issue will be his demise. I can already see him pacing the WH in 2020, crying to do-nothing brad parscale, when his tweets are being sent into the abyss and never gain any traction, because all of the network nodes that spread his message in 2016 were systematically expunged from the mainstream internet and are long gone.

Uh, didn't he just act with this?

With what?

He (or at least his team -- he doesn't know anything) already knows the problem, and they are just finding more and more creative ways to not do anything about it.

Here's what silicon big tech companies are doing: they intentionally create these super vague ToS' so they can turn around and enforce/apply them asymmetrically for (blatantly obvious) political reasons.

Big Tech silicon companies saw how DJT used their platforms to gain political momentum starting from '15-present. DJT's use of Twitter arguably helped him win the election. They. do. not. want. that. to. happen. again. for. ANY. right. leaning. candidate. After all, these big tech companies are literally all located within a few feet from each other in Silicon Valley and it's no secret they are all super liberal. These tech companies KNOW that having super vague ToS will allow them to be very arbitrarily selective when enforcing and that's just flat out ethically wrong. Their ToS are now just legal fig leaves. Anyone who can't see how hypocritical these big tech companies have become is either blind or just ideologically possessed. Vague standards + asymmetric enforcement + opaque accusations + no appeals = narrative control. We could create an entire thread just for highlighting conservatives/moderates who've been wrongfully banned/suspended from Twitter for simply citing scientific facts/stats while Twitter simultaneously allows actual racism/homophobia from blue verified badge accounts (many from prominent media darlings on the left). On Twitter, you can call for the death of white people all day long and there's a good chance nothing will happen to your account...however, if you criticize Sharia Law or say something like "A man is a man and a woman is a woman" you will get banned/no appealed, ESPECIALLY if you're a prominent conservative with lots of followers.

I encourage everyone to check out Tim Pool's appearance on the JRE w/ Twitter CEO and one of Twitter's top lawyers if you've got a few hours to spare. Tim Pool (who's actually a classic liberal boots on the ground journalist) absolutely embarrasses the twitter bafoons and exposes their bias.

(05-16-2019 06:30 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Whatever happened to the other website or hotline trump created for Republicans to cry on?

It was disconnected due to all of the winning and no crying on this side.

(05-16-2019 08:14 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:21 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:10 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:06 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Lame.

Mr. 24/7 social media president is complaining about the social media that got him elected. Does he ever take personal responsibility about anything?

No you effin maroon, he's complaining about social media banning conservative voices from their platforms. When the pendulum swings back, as it inevitably does, such bias could impact you. I bet you won't be making fun of anyone then,

Those idiots would not have been banned if they read the Terms of Agreements that you signed up agreeing too. Under the law? The social media companies have a contract that you agree to which protects them from frivilious lawsuits and slanders from the ones banned or from the President. Even under law, they are protected from Elizabeth Warren as well.

Let's be honest. It's hard to take Facebook at face value (pun intended) when they use that "terms of agreement" to ban someone like Paul Joseph Watson all the while allowing things like jihad pages and blatantly Anti-Trump pages who are guilty of much worse.

Even if PJW violated terms, it looks bad when he gets banned while others are allowed who just happen to have a left viewpoint.

Bad Optics and has a whiff of bias and hypocrisy.

Everytime they take down those Jihad pages, 10 more pops up after one gets taken down. What they need is more help and you do not have enough money to pay people to take these things down and pay people to fix technical glitches and all that. I think if we all chip in and report those pages? Those pages would be taken down.