(05-01-2019 09:11 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

I don't recall the constitution guaranteeing anyone the "right" to seek asylum.

Being "poor", uneducated, and from a "shitehole" doesn't constitute being "persecuted".

Not to mention, we're under under no obligation to offer any Tom, Dick, or Harry a "hearing".

ESPECIALLY when they show up in an invading horde.

Anyone traveling from Cameroon and passing through 7 countries to show up here isn’t seeking “asylum”. He’s seeking entry into the U.S.

Asylum? Go to the next nearest place where you can find safety. If fleeing Vz., you go to Brazil.

Fleeing Bangladesh? How the eff do you end up at Tx/Mex border?

Send em back. Send em alllll back.

(05-01-2019 07:57 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Many of my customers are "third world", first generation Americans who are busting their collective asses to make a life for their families in this country;

When did Budweiser start delivering in personal vehicles?

(05-01-2019 08:03 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

What if they are not legitimate asylum seekers, and not willing to go through the asylum process, but are simply entering illegally and have been coached to scream, "Asylum," when apprehended? Do you draw a line, and if so where?

Then only let the white ones in... they are less apt to be al Qaeda.

(05-01-2019 11:48 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 09:11 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

I don't recall the constitution guaranteeing anyone the "right" to seek asylum.

Being "poor", uneducated, and from a "shitehole" doesn't constitute being "persecuted".

Not to mention, we're under under no obligation to offer any Tom, Dick, or Harry a "hearing".

ESPECIALLY when they show up in an invading horde.

Anyone traveling from Cameroon and passing through 7 countries to show up here isn’t seeking “asylum”. He’s seeking entry into the U.S.

Asylum? Go to the next nearest place where you can find safety. If fleeing Vz., you go to Brazil.

Fleeing Bangladesh? How the eff do you end up at Tx/Mex border?

Send em back. Send em alllll back.

Sure they are... How many countries did Jews fleeing the Germans pass through to get here?

Of course, many of the same xenophobic paranoids were scared the fleeing Jews would be a drain, so we sent boatloads back to Europe to be murdered.

(05-01-2019 01:55 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 11:48 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 09:11 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

I don't recall the constitution guaranteeing anyone the "right" to seek asylum.

Being "poor", uneducated, and from a "shitehole" doesn't constitute being "persecuted".

Not to mention, we're under under no obligation to offer any Tom, Dick, or Harry a "hearing".

ESPECIALLY when they show up in an invading horde.

Anyone traveling from Cameroon and passing through 7 countries to show up here isn’t seeking “asylum”. He’s seeking entry into the U.S.

Asylum? Go to the next nearest place where you can find safety. If fleeing Vz., you go to Brazil.

Fleeing Bangladesh? How the eff do you end up at Tx/Mex border?

Send em back. Send em alllll back.

Sure they are... How many countries did Jews fleeing the Germans pass through to get here?

Of course, many of the same xenophobic paranoids were scared the fleeing Jews would be a drain, so we sent boatloads back to Europe to be murdered.

So you leftists were anti-Semitic even back then?

(05-01-2019 11:23 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

They're not. Most are using the asylum angle to gain entry. It has been documented that they are being told to claim asylum regardless of their situation. Most are just poor folks looking for opportunity. Sadly...We just can't handle all of them currently.

There’s nothing sad about the entire third world not having a right to just show up in America.

(05-01-2019 01:55 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 11:48 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 09:11 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

I don't recall the constitution guaranteeing anyone the "right" to seek asylum.

Being "poor", uneducated, and from a "shitehole" doesn't constitute being "persecuted".

Not to mention, we're under under no obligation to offer any Tom, Dick, or Harry a "hearing".

ESPECIALLY when they show up in an invading horde.

Anyone traveling from Cameroon and passing through 7 countries to show up here isn’t seeking “asylum”. He’s seeking entry into the U.S.

Asylum? Go to the next nearest place where you can find safety. If fleeing Vz., you go to Brazil.

Fleeing Bangladesh? How the eff do you end up at Tx/Mex border?

Send em back. Send em alllll back.

Sure they are... How many countries did Jews fleeing the Germans pass through to get here?

Of course, many of the same xenophobic paranoids were scared the fleeing Jews would be a drain, so we sent boatloads back to Europe to be murdered.

Jews that were being killed by the thousands vs. people who's tragedy is being "poor"?

YUGE difference.

One was actually persecuted, the other wants to get on the social welfare roles.

(05-01-2019 11:23 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

They're not. Most are using the asylum angle to gain entry. It has been documented that they are being told to claim asylum regardless of their situation. Most are just poor folks looking for opportunity. Sadly...We just can't handle all of them currently.

We can handle them just fine...

Trump simply decided to demonize them because it plays to disenfranchised, white base of voters.

(05-01-2019 03:15 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 11:23 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 07:40 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  If they are asylum seekers and willing to go through the asylum process, then I do not see the issue.

They're not. Most are using the asylum angle to gain entry. It has been documented that they are being told to claim asylum regardless of their situation. Most are just poor folks looking for opportunity. Sadly...We just can't handle all of them currently.

We can handle them just fine...

Trump simply decided to demonize them because it plays to disenfranchised, white base of voters.

No we can't and black Americans are consistently the highest group against illegal immigration.