and yet there's still 39% that won't let it go. What idiots we have in this country. It makes me sad and angry. I guess FDR had the same problem with the Axis and it took the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor for the people to see that we had to fight sooner or later. I guess we're too fat and lazy and we use what we sit on to think and not our brains...or common sense.

Look at some on this message board. The MSMs constant harping the negative is downright disgusting. Anyone getting their information there or on the late night comedy shows are truly ignorant of what’s going on around them. To climb over 50% on any poll positive toward Trump is absolutely amazing.

(04-19-2019 11:33 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Look at some on this message board. The MSMs constant harping the negative is downright disgusting. Anyone getting their information there or on the late night comedy shows are truly ignorant of what’s going on around them. To climb over 50% on any poll positive toward Trump is absolutely amazing.

There are huge numbers relying almost solely on social media, where anyone who disagrees with the content creator simply gets their message deleted...

Thought y'all didn't trust polls

Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

Yes Owl... He is required and has complied with a financial disclosure statement...

The 1040 requirement that Densa seeks is a distraction, and he either knows it or is a moron. I'll let him decide.

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

What do you expect to learn from a tax return?

Have you never seen a tax return? Has the irs alleged some wrongdoing? Isn’t that part of their job?!?

It’s a losing issue for the dems, but they are so unhinged and afraid of the alt-left fringe that they may go for it anyway. We should egg them on.

In peach!

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

And when that’s a nothing burger, subpoena his poop to see if he is doing illegal drugs.....

Democrats. SMH.....

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

The Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

(04-20-2019 04:18 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

The Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

4th amendment was usurped by the Patriot Act.

(04-20-2019 11:45 AM)king king Wrote:  Thought y'all didn't trust polls

the only pole I believe is the one hangin' between me leggins....

#muhpolematters

(04-20-2019 06:41 PM)king king Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 04:18 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

The Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

4th amendment was usurped by the Patriot Act.

Someone gets it.

(04-20-2019 07:52 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 11:45 AM)king king Wrote:  Thought y'all didn't trust polls

the only pole I believe is the one hangin' between me leggins....

#muhpolematters

Damn skippy!!

(04-20-2019 06:41 PM)king king Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 04:18 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

The Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

4th amendment was usurped by the Patriot Act.

National security

(04-20-2019 04:12 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

And when that’s a nothing burger, subpoena his poop to see if he is doing illegal drugs.....

Democrats. SMH.....

Remember that the Mueller investigation was started and run by Republicans, now it is the Congress’ turn to investigate.

(04-20-2019 03:02 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:36 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 02:09 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-20-2019 01:49 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Late night, like there won’t be a next day. Please stop. Congress is going to move on alright. Let’s see these financials.

Come up with probable cause if you want to see the financials. And "might" is not probable cause.

And actually, I think we probably already have financials. Isn't some sort of financial disclosure required, I believe on an annual basis?

“the secretary of the Treasury (or his delegate) “shall furnish” the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee with any tax return or return information requested in writing.”

Yes Owl... He is required and has complied with a financial disclosure statement...

The 1040 requirement that Densa seeks is a distraction, and he either knows it or is a moron. I'll let him decide.

It's easy to see which.