Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

BECAUSE MUELLER AND HIS MERRY BAND OF ANGRY DEMOCRATS SAID IT WASN’T.

So what, how is that illegal?

muh "ties" to..

mach, is Wikileaks a Russian front group?

Your answer is why it isn't collusion. You've convinced yourself of things that aren't true.

I thought page 148 was going to describe how Avenetti had the goods. damned.......

(04-18-2019 12:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  muh "ties" to..

mach, is Wikileaks a Russian front group?

Your answer is why it isn't collusion. You've convinced yourself of things that aren't true.

MSM convinced him. He was just fertile ground.

(04-18-2019 12:24 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

BECAUSE MUELLER AND HIS MERRY BAND OF ANGRY DEMOCRATS SAID IT WASN’T.

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*

How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

Lets have a little discussion about talking to people.
Bill meets with the AG who has control over any charges being filed against his wife... and the Left told us that it wasn't questionable at all.

So why would talking to someone who 'has ties to X' be of more concern than talking to someone who 'is in control of Y'.

The levels of cognitive dissonance you guys keep showing isn't going to do your mental health any good. I think its clear as people on the far left slip further and further towards the insane, and become more and more disconnected with reality.

Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 presidential election



Read it and weep. Two years of your life wasted pushing a false narrative spoon fed to you by your party and it's propaganda arms only to find out you were a simpleminded dupe who bought into the con job hook, line, and sinker.

So pathetic and sad

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

Shared polling data? Dern...Lock em up.

(04-18-2019 12:33 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  So pathetic and sad

Yes it is. Just waiting to see if there is ONE liberal to say “you know, I was wrong. There was no Russian collusion and this has harmed the country”.

Well maybe just “I was wrong” would do.....

(04-18-2019 12:30 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 12:24 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

BECAUSE MUELLER AND HIS MERRY BAND OF ANGRY DEMOCRATS SAID IT WASN’T.

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*

How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

Lets have a little discussion about talking to people.
Bill meets with the AG who has control over any charges being filed against his wife... and the Left told us that it wasn't questionable at all.

So why would talking to someone who 'has ties to X' be of more concern than talking to someone who 'is in control of Y'.

The levels of cognitive dissonance you guys keep showing isn't going to do your mental health any good. I think its clear as people on the far left slip further and further towards the insane, and become more and more disconnected with reality.

The last couple of years have convinced me that a lot of people are just on the edge of serious mental illness and we need to figure some better way out to handle it. Hence the other thread with the article from the NY Post.

I guess you didn't take a long enough break.

Napoleon, I am sure one day you'll find your soulmate too.

Resident alt-leftists always (only?) found solace in the fact that their untruths couldn't be debunked at that specific point in time (they could always fall back on the benefit of the doubt), but we always told them this day was coming.

They bluffed and bluffed, but we flopped the nut straight and were never folding.

Today, they had to show their pair of deuces.

Barr is a fraud.

(04-18-2019 12:59 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Barr is a fraud.

He didn't write the report lol.

(04-18-2019 12:21 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Manafort discussed the “strategy for winning Democratic votes in midwestern states” with Kilimnik who has “ties to Russian intelligence.” Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik in August of 2016 and for “some period of time after” that meeting.*




How in the F is this not collusion!!!!!

Disgusting.

No matter how hard you want it to be... it isn't.

"No collusion." - Robert Mueller

(04-18-2019 12:59 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Barr is a fraud.

I call, mach.

Let's see 'em.

lol oh.

gg, better luck next hoax.