The alt-left just can’t let it go. They can’t say *what* will be covered up, just that there will be a cover up.

They’re like spoiled children that think if they scream enough, they’ll get their way.

Also, the OP’s title is fake news.

A third-party account of 1 member of mueller’s team =/= mueller’s team.

Why does OP always have to lie about everything? It’s almost as if the facts are at direct conflict with his twisted, conspiracy theory worldview.

(04-04-2019 09:39 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 09:33 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Robert Mueller’s Team Says Report Had More Troubling Details About Trump Than William Barr Revealed



Maybe this is why some of us have waited until it's release to chime in.

LMAO...

Yeah. Sure it was.

All you're doing here is creating more fodder for us to make fun of you with when this one turns into a giant nothing burger too.

This just proves you're even less intelligent than we originally presumed.

Damn, I pretty much assumed the worst too.

(04-04-2019 09:46 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Recent picture of trump supporters.

I've been tossing around the word "projection" a lot lately. You're doing a marvelous job of it so far, keep it up. Some day you can look back on these posts and remind yourself why the democrat party failed so badly. Every.single.word. out of your mouth is sheer and blatant projection borne of desperation. You and the rest of the loons are consistent in sticking to this model you idiots have crafted for yourselves out of gossamer, lace and unicorn dust.

I would honestly be surprised if they weren't able to dig up dirt on Trump after the investigation they did. I'm a little surprised they didn't find collusion. I would bet most campaigns could be accused of some form of collusion and most have probably done it to some extent. The question now is will the damaging info be released to the public. If they are not going to charge him they should probably restrict any info to the items that relate directly to collusion and obstruction. Otherwise this is going to be a green light for Trump to weaponize the FBI and DOJ against political enemies. Even if he can't prove crimes he can use them to dig up dirt and make it public.
Trump seems like the Teflon Don as none of the dirt sticks to him. His opponents might not be so lucky.

(04-04-2019 01:30 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 01:18 PM)banker Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 01:08 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 12:39 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 10:15 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  So did Mueller, Barr and Rosenstein. So, yes, it should be.

Wrong.

Quote:Mr. Mueller’s team drew no conclusions about whether Mr. Trump illegally obstructed justice, Mr. Barr said, so he made his own decision. The attorney general and his deputy, Rod J. Rosenstein, determined that the special counsel’s investigators had insufficient evidence to establish that the president committed that offense.

He cautioned, however, that Mr. Mueller’s report states that “while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him” on the obstruction of justice issue.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/24/us/po...mmary.html

someone doesnt know how the law works...

Yep. Wonder if bobcat engineer has that court document that affirms he never raped anybody?

SoMs Eagle claimed Barr and Mueller reported that the President was exonerated.

Barr's summary literally states: “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Right. Then Barr and Rosenstein, presumably with input from Mueller cause he hasn't objected, decided there really wasn't any there, there or there was no there, there.

How can the top law enforcement official in the Country obstruct the law for firing a subordinate anyway?

did he fire Mueller? Did he cut off the funding of the witchhunt? What and who was obstructed anyway? Where?!?

Collusion? No evidence of collusion (whatever that is). So if there's no crime there in the first place how can something be obstructed?

Dumb

(04-04-2019 03:37 PM)DETLTU Wrote:  I would honestly be surprised if they weren't able to dig up dirt on Trump after the investigation they did. I'm a little surprised they didn't find collusion. I would bet most campaigns could be accused of some form of collusion and most have probably done it to some extent. The question now is will the damaging info be released to the public. If they are not going to charge him they should probably restrict any info to the items that relate directly to collusion and obstruction. Otherwise this is going to be a green light for Trump to weaponize the FBI and DOJ against political enemies. Even if he can't prove crimes he can use them to dig up dirt and make it public.
Trump seems like the Teflon Don as none of the dirt sticks to him. His opponents might not be so lucky.

What exactly is "collusion" in a political campaign? I will hang up and wait for your answer.

(04-04-2019 03:37 PM)DETLTU Wrote:  I would honestly be surprised if they weren't able to dig up dirt on Trump after the investigation they did. I'm a little surprised they didn't find collusion. I would bet most campaigns could be accused of some form of collusion and most have probably done it to some extent. The question now is will the damaging info be released to the public. If they are not going to charge him they should probably restrict any info to the items that relate directly to collusion and obstruction. Otherwise this is going to be a green light for Trump to weaponize the FBI and DOJ against political enemies. Even if he can't prove crimes he can use them to dig up dirt and make it public.
Trump seems like the Teflon Don as none of the dirt sticks to him. His opponents might not be so lucky.

What damaging info? What dirt? Are you just assuming there is something even though Mueller and his merry band of dedicated dims came up with a big ZIPPO?!?

Why Barr lie? Why would Mueller sit aside and let him lie about something destined to come out a week or two later? Would Barr, someone with 40 yrs in the career throw all that away for a 2 week reprieve for Trump? Is he getting paid off like Dershowitz was?

And releasing gov't/criminal investigation stuff about people that haven't committed a crime or won't be charged is illegal anyway. Under the law that NADLER himself supported and voted for, now 2 tons of fun wants the top law enforcement official in the land (aside from POTUS) to break that very same law.

Stupid DeeCee political theater. Some folks will fall for the same gag time and time again.

It's amazing.

Given the heavy preponderance of democrats on Mueller's team, I am not surprised that some of them are not happy with Barr's summary. I've said all along, don't go spiking the football until the final report is out.

But what are these things that they find "troubling"? Would a democrat and anti-Trumper find it "troubling" that Trump thought about firing Muller and even discussed it with Rosenstein? Absolutely. For that matter, would a republican anti-Trumper (and there are plenty) find that "troubling"? Absolutely. Is it in any way, shape, or form obstruction? Absolutely not.

Here's the kind of thing I expect. Let's say it takes A and B and C to constitute a crime. I expect we'll see that we have something over here that might be A. And we have something over here that if you squint hard enough, you might be able to make it look like B. Now, we don't have anything on C, but if you have A and B, then isn't it reasonable that C could possibly have happened too? Viola--obstruction, or "collusion," or whatever.

These claims from "un-named" sources. Get a source to go on record and then this fairy tale might be worth listening to.

(04-04-2019 08:20 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  These claims from "un-named" sources. Get a source to go on record and then this fairy tale might be worth listening to.

the gullibility of the average dipshite never surprises me....

"if that son of a biatch wins, we're all gonna hang" - HRC

the msm is running the William Randolph Hearst playbook TTT....

the msm scares me more moving forward than the dems relative to ethics....

The left is so desperate for literally ANYTHING they've been told to actually be true they continue to hang that hope on stuff like this. You'd think they have learned by now after being lied to for two years but I guess the TDS is ingrained and they see no other way.

Libs are really pathetic. It’s funny as hell.

(04-05-2019 08:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  Libs are really pathetic. It’s funny as hell.

They hung EVERYTHING on the Mueller report so it's to be expected. Heck, once they see the entire report they'll make mountains out of molehills and complain that a comma was out of place, etc.

It will eventually be released, it just amazes me that people can't wait until that happens.

(04-05-2019 08:47 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  Libs are really pathetic. It’s funny as hell.

They hung EVERYTHING on the Mueller report so it's to be expected. Heck, once they see the entire report they'll make mountains out of molehills and complain that a comma was out of place, etc.

They’re already preparing for Trump’s tax returns to take some of the heat off of them.
They can’t win in the world of political ideas, so you have absurdity.....

(04-05-2019 08:57 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:47 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  Libs are really pathetic. It’s funny as hell.

They hung EVERYTHING on the Mueller report so it's to be expected. Heck, once they see the entire report they'll make mountains out of molehills and complain that a comma was out of place, etc.

They’re already preparing for Trump’s tax returns to take some of the heat off of them.
They can’t win in the world of political ideas, so you have absurdity.....

All that says is they nothing about tax returns.

(04-04-2019 03:26 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 09:39 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(04-04-2019 09:33 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Robert Mueller’s Team Says Report Had More Troubling Details About Trump Than William Barr Revealed



Maybe this is why some of us have waited until it's release to chime in.

LMAO...

Yeah. Sure it was.

All you're doing here is creating more fodder for us to make fun of you with when this one turns into a giant nothing burger too.

This just proves you're even less intelligent than we originally presumed.

Damn, I pretty much assumed the worst too.

Well, I'm not convinced the TDS on the left has reached rock bottom yet. They're still excavating.

(04-05-2019 09:28 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:57 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:47 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-05-2019 08:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  Libs are really pathetic. It’s funny as hell.

They hung EVERYTHING on the Mueller report so it's to be expected. Heck, once they see the entire report they'll make mountains out of molehills and complain that a comma was out of place, etc.

They’re already preparing for Trump’s tax returns to take some of the heat off of them.
They can’t win in the world of political ideas, so you have absurdity.....

All that says is they nothing about tax returns.

Since when did NOT knowing anything about something stop them from claiming to be experts?