https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/mue...napolitano

He has always been a never Trumper along with Neil Cavuto.

I don't like the guy because he has it out for Trump I don't like the guy because he is wrong more often then right.

These guys are smart. They went to really good schools.

I want to see the whole report before reaching any conclusions. But it strikes me that if Barr misstated anything, then Mueller has both a right and a constitutional duty to set the record straight ASAP. So far, nada.

I've tended to like Napolitano's generally libertarian take. Not quite sure how or why he ended up on the never-Trumper train.

(03-27-2019 05:36 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I've tended to like Napolitano's generally libertarian take. Not quite sure how or why he ended up on the never-Trumper train.

It might be an extreme position for him to take but there's a lot about Trump's policies for libertarians to dislike. Trade, immigration, First Amendment as just a few examples.

I watched the video. I found his analysis quite reasonable.

(03-27-2019 06:05 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 05:36 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I've tended to like Napolitano's generally libertarian take. Not quite sure how or why he ended up on the never-Trumper train.

It might be an extreme position for him to take but there's a lot about Trump's policies for libertarians to dislike. Trade, immigration, First Amendment as just a few examples.

He just signed an EO to guarantee 1A rights on all college campuses, what has he done that violates 1A rights?

(03-27-2019 06:05 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 05:36 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I've tended to like Napolitano's generally libertarian take. Not quite sure how or why he ended up on the never-Trumper train.

It might be an extreme position for him to take but there's a lot about Trump's policies for libertarians to dislike. Trade, immigration, First Amendment as just a few examples.

But not as much for libertarians to dislike as there is for the apparently available alternatives. Or at least not for this libertarian.

"Judge" Nappy is an IDIOT. He can't possibly know what's in the report being that he never read it. Even if there's no proof in the report democrats will say there is, dems are desperate.

Neither Nap nor Neil are Never Trumpers.

(03-27-2019 04:32 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/mue...napolitano

He has always been a never Trumper along with Neil Cavuto.

I don't like the guy because he has it out for Trump I don't like the guy because he is wrong more often then right.

I've watched it happen.....it's bizarre how NC-pudgy boys gnip-gnop back and forth on the fence.....

#typicallibertarian

Typical liberaltarian. Lets perfect get in the way of good. They are just as big of a problem for Republicans as the dims.

(03-27-2019 06:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Neither Nap nor Neil are Never Trumpers.

that is correct....they're hem-haws to "T"....

this pretty much sums up those two jag-offs...

(03-27-2019 08:06 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Typical liberaltarian. Lets perfect get in the way of good. They are just as big of a problem for Republicans as the dims.

We prefer not to collectivize in the first place, regardless of label, unless it is to agree that there should be less collectivization.

(03-27-2019 08:06 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Typical liberaltarian. Lets perfect get in the way of good. They are just as big of a problem for Republicans as the dims.

GTS please delete.

(03-27-2019 08:06 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Typical liberaltarian. Lets perfect get in the way of good. They are just as big of a problem for Republicans as the dims.

The libertarians who insist on perfection are just as big a problem for pragmatic libertarians.

The neocons and religious right who insist on 100% perfect adherence to their points of view are equally big problems for republicans IMO. Maybe that opinion exists because I agree with a lot more of what libertarians believe than I do with neocons or the religious right.

I would like to see a pragmatic conservative who is not afraid to take a stand. Sad but true, the closest I see to that right now is Donald Trump.

(03-27-2019 06:21 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 06:05 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 05:36 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I've tended to like Napolitano's generally libertarian take. Not quite sure how or why he ended up on the never-Trumper train.

It might be an extreme position for him to take but there's a lot about Trump's policies for libertarians to dislike. Trade, immigration, First Amendment as just a few examples.

But not as much for libertarians to dislike as there is for the apparently available alternatives. Or at least not for this libertarian.

Has a libertarian ever been elected. I cant think of one. I mean kits fine as an "ism" but you gotta win something. Until libertarians win something they just elect democrats. Not hating but it ain't real till it's gets real.

To the OP about nap......does anyone really gaf what he thinks?

(03-27-2019 09:21 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 08:06 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Typical liberaltarian. Lets perfect get in the way of good. They are just as big of a problem for Republicans as the dims.

The libertarians who insist on perfection are just as big a problem for pragmatic libertarians.

The neocons and religious right who insist on 100% perfect adherence to their points of view are equally big problems for republicans IMO. Maybe that opinion exists because I agree with a lot more of what libertarians believe than I do with neocons or the religious right.

I would like to see a pragmatic conservative who is not afraid to take a stand. Sad but true, the closest I see to that right now is Donald Trump.

XACLY!

it's simply a waste of time and why both sides have no clue how to combat such....

however, the ones left on the right are beginning to realize the virtue of such....

ol' boy changed the game.....and yaz never saw it coming....

#anotherbeautifulday

Well Well. Judge Nap changed the title of his article from

"Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction"

To

"Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves some conspiracy, obstruction but not enough"

He even got the page count of the report wrong. In the article he says the report is over 700 pages and it was confirmed today the report is more like 300.

Big difference on both accounts.

(03-28-2019 11:36 AM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  Well Well. Judge Nap changed the title of his article from

"Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction"

To

"Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves some conspiracy, obstruction but not enough"

He even got the page count of the report wrong. In the article he says the report is over 700 pages and it was confirmed today the report is more like 300.

Big difference on both accounts.

he's a pandering former jurist pos...

about time you folks got woke how propaganda is distributed...