bwahahahahaha...Schiffhead is being a little bitchy boy and not wanting to believe there will be no more indictments.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/adam-sc...to-testify

Well, so much for that insurance policy. Now when does the investigation begin of those that put this phony bunch of lies into motion. Also, now lets go after you know who....

(03-22-2019 08:23 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  bwahahahahaha...Schiffhead is being a little bitchy boy and not wanting to believe there will be no more indictments.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/adam-sc...to-testify

"Methinks he dost protest too much..."

Libs still at it. Witnesses weren’t cooperative enough. Laws not properly written to stop Trump’s ‘crimes’. Mueller couldn’t dig deep enough. Mueller will be subpoenaed (walking that back now). There is not complete disclosure. Barr is Trump’s boy. Trump refused to testify so he must be guilty. Mueller didn’t try to make Trump testify. Trump lied......

These people are beyond politics. They are truly sick individuals.

(03-22-2019 08:17 PM)Claw Wrote:  I think all this celebrating is a bit premature.

I want to see the report before any 'celebrating', but the fact this is dropping on friday and the news that there won't be any more indictments seems to prove what most of us here have thought from day one.

(03-22-2019 09:26 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Libs still at it. Witnesses weren’t cooperative enough. Laws not properly written to stop Trump’s ‘crimes’. Mueller couldn’t dig deep enough. Mueller will be subpoenaed (walking that back now). There is not complete disclosure. Barr is Trump’s boy. Trump refused to testify so he must be guilty. Mueller didn’t try to make Trump testify. Trump lied......

These people are beyond politics. They are truly sick individuals.

And really low IQ.

The biggest question in over two years now is..."What will they talk about next week?"

(03-22-2019 06:32 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-22-2019 05:03 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(03-22-2019 04:52 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-22-2019 04:20 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Is it still a witch-hunt if it exonerates the prez?

If the investigation was intitiated based on knowlingly false information---yes, absolutely it would be the very definition of a witch hunt.

So that negates the crime committed?

What? Crime committed? You just said exonerated... what?

The crime of beating HRC in a rigged election

The index card says it's time to go back to "mentally unstable, unfit for office".

Trump talks to Mueller and the Dems after the report drops.

I'm gathering from /r/politics the talking points are in.

Trump did not collude with Russia. Good. He is still a horrible human being and now it is the time for the SDNY and State's Attorney to have a turn. He might not have committed a federal crime, but surely something was done illegal with Cohen.

This was never about Russia, this was about orange man bad.

(03-23-2019 07:56 AM)bobdizole Wrote:  I'm gathering from /r/politics the talking points are in.

Trump did not collude with Russia. Good. He is still a horrible human being and now it is the time for the SDNY and State's Attorney to have a turn. He might not have committed a federal crime, but surely something was done illegal with Cohen.

This was never about Russia, this was about orange man bad.

They are going to try to dig into his business life for the past 40 years. Given that he was in NYC real estate, its pretty telling they haven't come up with anything previously. More waste of time. He dealt with some unsavory characters as has everyone in NYC real estate.

They need to tread carefully, even the NY AG. Barr isnt screwing around. it should be pointed out that within a few weeks of him getting sworn in:

1. Indictments for nothingburgers on Jr, Kushner, and Prince were shot down.

2. Weismann and his dossier buddy were shown the door.

3. Rosenstein was told he would stay on a little longer to write up a report on the FISA abuse, and for him to be prepared to answer questions.

4. Mueller investigation suddenly concludes


So Barr is actually moving at a very fast clip since he took over.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

^

what an idiot.

(03-22-2019 09:35 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(03-22-2019 08:17 PM)Claw Wrote:  I think all this celebrating is a bit premature.

I want to see the report before any 'celebrating', but the fact this is dropping on friday and the news that there won't be any more indictments seems to prove what most of us here have thought from day one.

I'm not celebrating anything... and the only celebrating I see here (of any significance) is over the ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that the left had taken no quarter on delivering of collusion... to the point of belittling, insulting and 'unfriending' anyone who didn't agree with them.

I think that's certainly noteworthy, but hardly cause for celebration.

(03-22-2019 10:11 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  The biggest question in over two years now is..."What will they talk about next week?"

How they were still right and if you hold the report 'just right' you will see that they were still right

(03-23-2019 09:01 AM)bullet Wrote:  They are going to try to dig into his business life for the past 40 years. Given that he was in NYC real estate, its pretty telling they haven't come up with anything previously. More waste of time. He dealt with some unsavory characters as has everyone in NYC real estate.

Which includes a lot of leaders from the left. NYC real estate is a slimy business... this would be a dangerous tact for them to take.

What amazes me... is that we had 18 months of "leaks" but the report gets releases to Barr and we have no leaks. It makes me wonder if all the supposed leaks we read about were simply lies made up by the media.

(03-23-2019 12:40 PM)No Bull Wrote:  What amazes me... is that we had 18 months of "leaks" but the report gets releases to Barr and we have no leaks. It makes me wonder if all the supposed leaks we read about were simply lies made up by the media.