Article from the Commanders Website
https://aaf.com/elliott-looking-to-be-be...e-alliance

Maybe he will get another shot with the NFL. I see that Woodside has already thrown 5 interceptions, not good and only hitting on 51% of his passes.

(02-26-2019 12:20 PM)Springboromark Wrote:  Maybe he will get another shot with the NFL. I see that Woodside has already thrown 5 interceptions, not good and only hitting on 51% of his passes.

He is not the same Logan Woodside that we are accustomed to. Is it that he is trying to do so much, or was our line a lot better than we thought they were?

(02-26-2019 01:38 PM)Babes boy Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 12:20 PM)Springboromark Wrote:  Maybe he will get another shot with the NFL. I see that Woodside has already thrown 5 interceptions, not good and only hitting on 51% of his passes.

He is not the same Logan Woodside that we are accustomed to. Is it that he is trying to do so much, or was our line a lot better than we thought they were?

In my opinion from watching the second game his current receivers are not near as good as those he had at Toledo. Dropping a lot of passes which is causing him to press a bit.

3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

You must be new here....

(02-26-2019 04:26 PM)toledobrad Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

You must be new here....

Well, duh! I mean my 24,000 posts just scream “Newbie who actually has a life”!

(02-26-2019 04:36 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 04:26 PM)toledobrad Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

You must be new here....

Well, duh! I mean my 24,000 posts just scream “Newbie who actually has a life”!

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

(02-26-2019 04:26 PM)toledobrad Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

You must be new here....

Since when is explaining why he is having problems because his receivers drop passes WRITING ANYONE OFF. I was trying to explain why he wasn't playing at his the level he played at for UT.

(02-26-2019 10:30 PM)rocketpaul Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

(02-26-2019 04:26 PM)toledobrad Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

You must be new here....

Since when is explaining why he is having problems because his receivers drop passes WRITING ANYONE OFF. I was trying to explain why he wasn't playing at his the level he played at for UT.

And if I wrote my comment in response to your post you might have reason to post in all caps, but since my comment had nothing to do with your post I guess I can’t answer. There have been several posts saying he just doesn’t look like the old Logan Woodside. Yours was not one. In fact, mine pretty much concurs with yours. If I’m responding to something you wrote you’ll see your post quoted above my response:

(02-26-2019 11:10 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 10:30 PM)rocketpaul Wrote:  

(02-26-2019 02:17 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  3 games in with players who never played together and we’re writing him off?

Since when is explaining why he is having problems because his receivers drop passes WRITING ANYONE OFF. I was trying to explain why he wasn't playing at his the level he played at for UT.

And if I wrote my comment in response to your post you might have reason to post in all caps, but since my comment had nothing to do with your post I guess I can’t answer. There have been several posts saying he just doesn’t look like the old Logan Woodside. Yours was not one. In fact, mine pretty much concurs with yours. If I’m responding to something you wrote you’ll see your post quoted above my response:

Your post clearly could be interpreted as a response to someone ("we're") as opposed to a non-sequitur, you didn't quote anyone, your post followed his and it is his thread. Easy mistake to make.

Sports life must be good, we're debating message board etiquette.