(02-13-2019 07:13 PM)bullet Wrote:  Actually AOC is pretty funny. She just doesn't realize it. That analysis of body language video was hilarious, as was her comparison to Ms. South Carolina.

you're right....only b/c she truly believes she has 'answers'....

I could write 3 seasons around that donkey kong'd mouth of hers....

it's like like like like chrissy snow in da howze....

(02-13-2019 09:37 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 09:27 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/42...ning-mates

"Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who announced this month he is running for president, said Tuesday he would prioritize finding a female running mate if he is the Democratic nominee.

Booker told MSNBC host Rachel Maddow that while he does not want to box himself in, he would be “looking to women first” as his pick for vice president...."

So every Democrat will have to promise to have at least one woman on the ticket. And they will top that by insisting there be at least one Black.

That's the inherent problem with the left's insistence on identity politics.

Why would you EVER choose the most qualified person to be a running mate when you can "pick" someone who checks the most boxes.

Makes me wonder, if Booker found a male who "identified" as a woman, would THAT count?

Only if he/she is a cross dresser too.

(02-13-2019 06:07 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 06:03 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  He also said he thought we should have a woman president. So why the fuxk is he running again a handful of dem women if he feels there should be a woman president? Isnt he using his Male privilege by running against them?

female privil(rage) > black male privil(rage) > white privilege

Which is directly inverse to the amount of appropriate shame one should feel for being the beneficiary of any of that privilege.

(02-13-2019 08:05 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 06:07 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 06:03 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  He also said he thought we should have a woman president. So why the fuxk is he running again a handful of dem women if he feels there should be a woman president? Isnt he using his Male privilege by running against them?

female privil(rage) > black male privil(rage) > white privilege

Which is directly inverse to the amount of appropriate shame one should feel for being the beneficiary of any of that privilege.

Hey! It's only privilege if you didn't earn it! I never begrudge anyone's work rewards. And I never envy what somebody else has. But I do reciprocate the hell out of any jerk's resentment of what I earned. I just know I didn't see their butts out there while I was working 60 to 70 hours a week for 40 years. If they don't have, or can't get, it's not my problem. If they want advice or help I'm happy to give it.

(02-13-2019 08:22 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 08:05 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 06:07 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-13-2019 06:03 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  He also said he thought we should have a woman president. So why the fuxk is he running again a handful of dem women if he feels there should be a woman president? Isnt he using his Male privilege by running against them?

female privil(rage) > black male privil(rage) > white privilege

Which is directly inverse to the amount of appropriate shame one should feel for being the beneficiary of any of that privilege.

Hey! It's only privilege if you didn't earn it! I never begrudge anyone's work rewards. And I never envy what somebody else has. But I do reciprocate the hell out of any jerk's resentment of what I earned. I just know I didn't see their butts out there while I was working 60 to 70 hours a week for 40 years. If they don't have, or can't get, it's not my problem. If they want advice or help I'm happy to give it.

MY FLAG

She should be a qualified female. We should implement the same policy for the SR.

(02-13-2019 08:48 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  She should be a qualified female. We should implement the same policy for the SR.

dem version....