(02-10-2019 12:35 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote: I’m not “sold” on Pera and or this team.
I will be more sold if/when transfers are kept to a minimum this offseason (4/5 frosh staying would be fine).
That said, I’m certainly not dismayed by this team as I was earlier this season... There has been definite progress and I think we should let Pera see it through.
With Pera, for me, there are three distinct and independent 'grading' criteria:
a) record vs expected;
b) 'growth' of the maturity of play; and
c) retention of younger players.
In order, for me:
a) I will give Pera an 'A' at this point. I would have never expected the number of wins to be at the number they have right now. I truly expected a 5 win total season.
b) The team has shown an ability to play well beyond where they were at the first of the season. They have shown the maturity to play *with* any team in CUSA at this point --- a far cry from the beginning of the season. Give Pera a B+ here --- by getting into the middle pod there is still one assignment outstanding here which could pop them to an A- for me.
c) Inc. ---- we have no idea what type of Exodus-fever will strike, if any. If three bolt I would offhand say a D, 2 bolt C-, 1 bolt B+, zero bolt A or A+.
Those would be the yardsticks for me, at this point. If I see any others here that I think are good to include, this list is not set in stone for me. Just my gut, seat of the pants look at the present time.