Glad to hear that she attended the meeting today. That is welcome news.

(02-15-2019 02:16 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Glad to hear that she attended the meeting today. That is welcome news.

no it's not....

at least this thread will die now...

(02-15-2019 02:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-15-2019 02:16 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Glad to hear that she attended the meeting today. That is welcome news.

no it's not....

at least this thread will die now...

Pics or didn't happen.

(02-15-2019 04:11 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(02-15-2019 02:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-15-2019 02:16 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Glad to hear that she attended the meeting today. That is welcome news.

no it's not....

at least this thread will die now...

Pics or didn't happen.

I couldn't agree more....

it continually amazes me what does and does not gain traction in today's world of bs....

you know I'm all about line 1b) in the 420 crib....

might as well have fun with the bs outside one's control....

Why has no one thought to take a picture? Are they trying to hide something? At some point she will have to appear before the public.

(02-16-2019 10:57 AM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  Why has no one thought to take a picture? Are they trying to hide something? At some point she will have to appear before the public.

I seem to recall the leftist media going ape-**** over Melania not being seen for 3 weeks.

RGB has been missing for 3 months. We're supposed to believe she's working, and attending plays, when there are no photos of her. It makes me believe she is in incredibly bad shape. Bad enough shape that she may not be making the decisions, but others are doing it for her.

(02-16-2019 10:57 AM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  Why has no one thought to take a picture? Are they trying to hide something? At some point she will have to appear before the public.

My guess is that IF she did show up at a SCOTUS meeting as reported, she likely looks very unhealthy and they didn't want that kind of image to get out.

I will play the Doubting Thomas until I see a current image of Ginsberg. Something smells rotten in the state of Denmark.

She's been spotted in the latest lego movie. Everyone can rest easy now.

(02-16-2019 10:57 AM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  Why has no one thought to take a picture? Are they trying to hide something? At some point she will have to appear before the public.

whatever you say, Alex Jones...

(02-16-2019 12:27 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-16-2019 10:57 AM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  Why has no one thought to take a picture? Are they trying to hide something? At some point she will have to appear before the public.

whatever you say, Alex Jones...

so a gang-banger cam can show proof of brutality and proof of existence for one of the most important 'darlings' of the dipshites is off-limits....

#gotcha

I'm pretty sure I know the source of the original video - but if anyone else recognizes parts of the audio, please chime in.

But this is seriously funny.

And I just have one question for the non-believers. So if RGB wasn't actually at the Supreme Court last week, why are her fellow judges remaining quiet? Seriously, don't you think Gorsuch or Kavanaugh would say 'excuse me, she was where?'

(02-17-2019 01:32 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  



I'm pretty sure I know the source of the original video - but if anyone else recognizes parts of the audio, please chime in.

But this is seriously funny.

And I just have one question for the non-believers. So if RGB wasn't actually at the Supreme Court last week, why are her fellow judges remaining quiet? Seriously, don't you think Gorsuch or Kavanaugh would say 'excuse me, she was where?'

pic or no bill....

when Tiger's ex buried a 9-iron into the windshield, there were paparazzi a 3-wood from my house that was a 9-iron left to his 3 mos. 'residence' in the 'burg...

wtfe...

(02-17-2019 01:32 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  



I'm pretty sure I know the source of the original video - but if anyone else recognizes parts of the audio, please chime in.

But this is seriously funny.

And I just have one question for the non-believers. So if RGB wasn't actually at the Supreme Court last week, why are her fellow judges remaining quiet? Seriously, don't you think Gorsuch or Kavanaugh would say 'excuse me, she was where?'

I didn't say she wasn't there. I question why we no one has produced a visual record of her appearance. What is her physical condition? Is there a reason they do not want the public to actually see her? If she would just make a public appearance, these doubts would go away. The Court meets again Tuesday. If she is at her seat, we will have our answer.

Regardless of political leanings, the Justices of the Supreme Court are notorious for circling their wagons to keep the facts of their little club private. So, I would expect Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts, Alito, and Thomas to cover for RBG. They all expect the same privilege to be afforded them should the time come.

Baloney. Gorsuch quickly made it known on the court he was going to do things his own way, and didn't care much for the traditions of the Court. If she was a vegetable for all practical intent, it would have been leaked by now - maybe not directly by him but by friends or acquaintances. And I don't believe Kavanaugh would be worried about the Court's reputation either.

They don't allow photos because it's the Supreme Court. Why do we not see any hearings on C-SPAN? Instead, all we get are drawings from courtroom artists. Cameras are confiscated before you enter the courtroom.

Give it up folks. This thread is more dead than RBG.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-com...t-justices

(02-17-2019 02:47 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Baloney. Gorsuch quickly made it known on the court he was going to do things his own way, and didn't care much for the traditions of the Court. If she was a vegetable for all practical intent, it would have been leaked by now - maybe not directly by him but by friends or acquaintances. And I don't believe Kavanaugh would be worried about the Court's reputation either.

They don't allow photos because it's the Supreme Court. Why do we not see any hearings on C-SPAN? Instead, all we get are drawings from courtroom artists. Cameras are confiscated before you enter the courtroom.

Give it up folks. This thread is more dead than RBG.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-com...t-justices

Your post would make sense if the thread was titled "54 (+19) days, how cold is RBG's body?"

(02-17-2019 02:47 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Baloney. Gorsuch quickly made it known on the court he was going to do things his own way, and didn't care much for the traditions of the Court. If she was a vegetable for all practical intent, it would have been leaked by now - maybe not directly by him but by friends or acquaintances. And I don't believe Kavanaugh would be worried about the Court's reputation either.

They don't allow photos because it's the Supreme Court. Why do we not see any hearings on C-SPAN? Instead, all we get are drawings from courtroom artists. Cameras are confiscated before you enter the courtroom.

Give it up folks. This thread is more dead than RBG.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-com...t-justices

Nice article. It only further affirms my position that the Court looks out for each other regardless of their political leanings. The facts on Gorsuch remind me of why I like him so much. When RBG is replaced, I hope we can place another Gorsuch on the Court.

Back to Ginsburg... There are reporters at the Supreme Court everyday. Any one of them could get a photograph of her before she entered the building, or as she is leaving. This thread will have run it's course only after the public has seen RBG and we have a better understanding of her condition. I can't understand why some on here find it unnecessary to know the physical and mental condition of the Justice.

(02-17-2019 03:49 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  I can't understand why some on here find it unnecessary to know the physical and mental condition of the Justice.

Team over Country. That's why.

I have pondered this a bit.

If she were not alive, I think the justices would have gone public. Even if she were non-responsive, I think the justices would have gone public.

Politics aside, I think the justices are not talking out of decorum. That makes me believe she is well enough to interact, but is not mentally competent to serve. Given the silence, I suspect she is unable to serve but not mentally acute enough to realize it.

I think the justices and everyone else are trying to keep her from publicly embarrassing herself. I think it is that simple. No one wants a career jurist like her to show up in public a blithering idiot. It's a bad thing for her and for the court.

I think this is the real lay of the land. Something will be quietly done and she will resign at that time.

(02-18-2019 02:09 AM)Claw Wrote:  I have pondered this a bit.

If she were not alive, I think the justices would have gone public. Even if she were non-responsive, I think the justices would have gone public.

Politics aside, I think the justices are not talking out of decorum. That makes me believe she is well enough to interact, but is not mentally competent to serve. Given the silence, I suspect she is unable to serve but not mentally acute enough to realize it.

I think the justices and everyone else are trying to keep her from publicly embarrassing herself. I think it is that simple. No one wants a career jurist like her to show up in public a blithering idiot. It's a bad thing for her and for the court.

I think this is the real lay of the land. Something will be quietly done and she will resign at that time.

Something is definitely going on, there is no reason to not let her be seen if she is well and healthy.
While I would like a more centrist judge than RBG in that seat, I don't wish death on her. But as the highest court in the land, we the American people are owed some transparency. And the silence and secrecy around how she is doing is very very troubling.