This is a few years old, but it was just sent to me by my sister who found it to be rather telling about the current state of Feminism in this country.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gkkj...r-problems

VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.

Quote:The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.

Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?

Quote:Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don't advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes.

So how would you achieve it?

Quote:Further research into designer babies will be necessary: manipulating gender or sex, prenatal sex discernment, sex-selective abortions, development of dual-female progeny (babies created from two mothers), and numerous other mechanisms will be utilised in order to achieve these aspirations. They won't be enforced or mandated to achieve the goal in the short-term, but merely heavily encouraged in the early stages. Unless one opposes abortion, there's little ethical reason to find that too outrageous a proposition. The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas. I've been meticulous and cautious. I've had the work reviewed by people who are experts—or at least extremely knowledgeable—in biology and genetics, and I've received confirmation that it all works out.

Would men be kept in isolation like stud horses?

Quote:I believe we must remove men from the community and place them in their own specific sections of society, akin to subsidised or state-funded reservations, so they can be redefined. We can make not only men safer, but women as well. By subsidising said reservations through the state we can provide men with activities, healthcare, entertainment, shelter, protection, and everything that one could ever require in life. This will remove conventional inequality from society. By reducing the number of men to 10 percent of the total population, their socio-biovalue will be raised. They will live out their lives happily and safely, and male disposability will be a thing of the past.

But don't men have value beyond breeding?

Quote:If technology has not advanced to a point where labour can be done without men, the few men that are necessary for said labour will be allowed to work on the outside of the reservations to complete whatever tasks necessary—if they wish.

Like slaves?

Quote:Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated.

You might be surprised at what leftists would do if they could. Given the opportunity to genocide others they will.
Regarding that Feminazi her experiment would end when it takes more than 24 hours to get her AC unit repaired.

Not a bad gig for the 10% left. Would suck for the other 90% though. Pretty much typical liberal crap. 10% live like kings while 90% live in fear and poverty.

One would think this line of thinking would have died out in the 40's with the Nazis.

(01-13-2019 04:44 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  You might be surprised at what leftists would do if they could. Given the opportunity to genocide others they always have.
Regarding that Feminazi her experiment would end when it takes more than 24 hours to get her AC unit repaired.

FIFY

Leaders who operate out of a sense of integrity and purpose have no need of murder because it is the vision they sell.
Leaders who operate out of fear and carry a constant feeling of insecurity will take the first opportunity to murder those they fear.

(01-13-2019 07:11 PM)memphistiger89 Wrote:  One would think this line of thinking would have died out in the 40's with the Nazis.

No. Given the opportunity the leftists in the USA would kill everyone who disagrees with them. But they can't get away with it. If they could they would though.