(12-15-2018 09:33 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(12-14-2018 07:45 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Acting? The clown show continues. Poor orange man forced to put someone in just to kill a story. Sad.

The guy that finally agreed to take the job will only take it on a short-term basis lol

Isn't that how every Trump appointment has worked out?

Has anyone ever paid attention to the Chief of Staff before?

Who were W.'s chieves of staff? Who were Clinton's? Who were HW's? Who were Reagan's?

For that matter, who were Obama's? I read somewhere he had 5.

(12-15-2018 10:01 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(12-15-2018 09:33 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(12-14-2018 07:45 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Acting? The clown show continues. Poor orange man forced to put someone in just to kill a story. Sad.

The guy that finally agreed to take the job will only take it on a short-term basis lol

Isn't that how every Trump appointment has worked out?

True dat. All the staffers will have the "working" qualifier on their titles from here on out.

(12-14-2018 06:19 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  I would imagine that would be a schit job under anyone.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Turrible job...especially in today's idiotic political environment.