Quote:Fleck left because it was time. He was never going to be able to achieve another 2016 again at WMU - or any G5 program.
He could at an AAC or MW program with $$ -- and WMU had $$. But yes, very good chance at WMU he wouldn't achieve the Same thing. It took each game OOC to be winnable for an above-average WMU team + every-so-often both Star WR & QB to be seniors. That said, I think if he wasn't P5-hunting with a fat contract, we would have years as MAC Champs where we'd bring the argument we were just as good as 2016 -- and IMO, would find a year or two being ranked down the road.
Quote:It was time to move. And as upsetting and narcissistic as his departure was, it was no worse than what Coaches like Mark Dantonio and Brian Kelly have done. It's the norm and the ugly nature of the business.
IMO, kind of harsher that sent KB hating on him.
Quote:But Fleck did leave talent. Enough for 8-9 wins in 2017. Unfortunately, a plethora of injuries got in the way. And, yes, some poor coaching decisions too (see not throwing to wide open RBs against MSU's weak outside LBs). That left WMU at 6-6. Sigh.
I agree. It's 9W potential IMO, only if there were no injuries + no poor coaching decisions with a new coach. Can't expect that. But IMO, even with the injuries, we should have gotten 7-5, even with a new coach.
Quote:2018 was marginally better with injuries again being a factor...along with some poor coaching decisions (going for it at BSU and WTF up-the-middle calls in key situations against BYU).
I agree...
Quote:Through all this, Lester has recruited well, v-e-r-y well.
I am confident WMU and Lester will experience a break-through in 2019. It may not be a MAC Championship, but there will be no blow-out losses (Sparty's gonna sweat and struggle) and we will be proud of this football team.
I disagree. Yes, he has recruited well. But him coming in, we had recruiting going well and have had it going well. Part of 2016's success was the schedule: A NW team who's no stranger to losing OOC games to mid-majors (or even decent FCS programs), and Illinois who was a bad team in reboot mode, along with Toledo+NIU at home, to go undefeated. And no key injuries (even though Davis I believe was playing with a slight injury in latter part of season).
2019 is not going to be so great. We can't assume to be so injury-free as '16. We can't expect our D to go from bottom to upper-level to kick things off. We have an improving Syracuse team on the road. Unless MSU has a key down year (like in '16), I don't see us winning that. Utah State, a deservingly rank-level team lost @MSU this year. Then we have Toledo+NIU+EMU+Ohio all on the road. It can be a bit of a better team overall, but the same record @7-5:
@Syracuse: Loss; No Syracuse running away with it 1st half. We keep in the game, but, lose by 14 in the end
@MSU: Within striking distance, but a loss. MSU didn't have a bad night and we weren't on some lucky night; lose by 10; respectable
GState: We win big; expected; liked
Monmouth: We win big; expected; liked
Miami-OH: They want revenge, but, phew, we thwart them. Thank gawd this one was at home!
BGSU: We win bigger than last year against them; liked
@Ohio: We want revenge; make it a great game, but, we lose by (respectable) 7
@EMU: Potential loss, but we eek out a win by 3.
CMU: CMU's adjusting; it's in our house; we win solidly
BSU: We get revenge on an improved BSU and solidly win by 17
@Toledo: We want revenge; make it a close game, but lose respectably by 7 with our late come-back
@NIU: NIU wants revenge on us and gets it; they can be tough at home even though not many show up
WMU: 7-5 (better than last year; tougher schedule set for Ws & Ls)