quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:13 PM |
|
otown
All American
Posts: 4,194
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 257
I Root For: Florida
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:18 PM |
|
RUScarlets
Heisman
Posts: 7,229
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 176
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
UCF has played in the Fiesta before when Bortles was there.
They have a solid club, should beat LSU.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:25 PM |
|
otown
All American
Posts: 4,194
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 257
I Root For: Florida
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
So the big question is if UCF will be motivated to play LSU. They feel slighted that they are not in the playoffs and LSU should be happy just to be in an NY6 bowl this year.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:26 PM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:27 PM |
|
MWC Tex
Heisman
Posts: 7,850
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 179
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
Yep, the Access Bowls don’t want to have G5 schools 2 years in a row. It is the Fiesta Bowl turn.
|
|
12-02-2018 03:35 PM |
|
otown
All American
Posts: 4,194
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 257
I Root For: Florida
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2018 04:10 PM by otown.)
|
|
12-02-2018 04:08 PM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 04:08 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
This is too simplistic. Yes, the committee decides where teams go in the NY6, not the bowls. But the bowls have input, they can voice concerns.
Bottom line is many UCF fans and others thoughr UCF would go to Peach because of obvious geogeaphic proximity. I correctly said Peach had zero desire to host UCF again and no way would they be in Peach.
I admit it's not entirely anti- UCF. The Peach also got Houston in 2015 and it surely doesn't want to be viewed as the G5 depository.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2018 08:49 PM by quo vadis.)
|
|
12-02-2018 08:41 PM |
|
templefootballfan
Heisman
Posts: 7,657
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 176
I Root For: TU & BGSU & TEX
Location: CLAYMONT DE Temple T
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
Wash St got robbed
should have cut them slack'playing that game in snowstorm
there 4 schools with more loses than WSU
|
|
12-02-2018 09:11 PM |
|
otown
All American
Posts: 4,194
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 257
I Root For: Florida
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 08:41 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 04:08 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
This is too simplistic. Yes, the committee decides where teams go in the NY6, not the bowls. But the bowls have input, they can voice concerns.
Bottom line is many UCF fans and others thoughr UCF would go to Peach because of obvious geogeaphic proximity. I correctly said Peach had zero desire to host UCF again and no way would they be in Peach.
I admit it's not entirely anti- UCF. The Peach also got Houston in 2015 and it surely doesn't want to be viewed as the G5 depository.
You seem to be confusing your opinion with fact. Seriously, put up some factual sources. Quoisms are not facts.
|
|
12-02-2018 09:22 PM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
It’ll be interesting to see how well UCF travels with that distance.
|
|
12-02-2018 09:39 PM |
|
CougarRed
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,450
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 09:39 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: It’ll be interesting to see how well UCF travels with that distance.
Traveled well when Bortles led them in the 2013 Fiesta.
|
|
12-02-2018 09:55 PM |
|
UCGrad1992
Legend
Posts: 31,952
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2312
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
I believe both LSU and UCF will be plenty motivated. UCF has proven they will be a worthy opponent and LSU will not take them lightly. LSU wants to play well to show their program is back toward the top and losing 3 games in the SEC Conference does not make them average along any P5 measure. Their losses were @Florida, Bama (who hasn't lost to Bama?) and @TXAM (7 OT). UCF is 25-0 over the past two seasons. Nuff said. Should be a good one. Of course, I'm pulling for the Knights since they are representing the AAC but I also want them to help push the narrative for expanding the CFP beyond 4 teams.
|
|
12-02-2018 10:22 PM |
|
P5PACSEC
Banned
Posts: 844
Joined: Jul 2018
I Root For: P5- Texas Tech
Location: Austin
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
I agree with you.
|
|
12-02-2018 10:41 PM |
|
P5PACSEC
Banned
Posts: 844
Joined: Jul 2018
I Root For: P5- Texas Tech
Location: Austin
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 04:08 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:13 PM)quo vadis Wrote: Rose: Washington vs Ohio State
Sugar: Texas vs Georgia
Peach: Florida vs Michigan
Fiesta: UCF vs LSU
I told UCF fans the Peach did not want them.
The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
Not sure why a Florida fan cares what happens to the G5 schools in your state?
Obviously the Peach wanted a bigger matchup and the Fiesta got stuck with a G5 school.
I hope LSU is motivated and I hate the cajun bengals.
|
|
12-02-2018 10:45 PM |
|
IWokeUpLikeThis
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13,901
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 1487
I Root For: NIU, Chicago St
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
Don’t like a 9-3 Florida with 2 FCS wins and a 3-TD smoking to Mizzou getting in over a 10-2 Wazzu who lost to USC on objectively sketchy officiating.
|
|
12-02-2018 11:48 PM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 09:22 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 08:41 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 04:08 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:18 PM)otown Wrote: The bowls don't have a say in the matter. Whether they want them or not, it's not their decision. Dont know why you are saying it was their choice.... just seems like you are trying hard to prove yourself correct, and to try to take a hit on the UCF program. However, it's not based in facts.
It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
This is too simplistic. Yes, the committee decides where teams go in the NY6, not the bowls. But the bowls have input, they can voice concerns.
Bottom line is many UCF fans and others thoughr UCF would go to Peach because of obvious geogeaphic proximity. I correctly said Peach had zero desire to host UCF again and no way would they be in Peach.
I admit it's not entirely anti- UCF. The Peach also got Houston in 2015 and it surely doesn't want to be viewed as the G5 depository.
You seem to be confusing your opinion with fact. Seriously, put up some factual sources. Quoisms are not facts.
If you've posted any facts here I've missed them, but I have one killer fact on my side: I correctly called an outcome that was consistent with my theory before it happened, and in the face of UCF fans and others who insisted the Peach was the destination and that the Peach liked UCF. And I even said I'd eat crow if UCF went to the Peach.
But anyway, here's an article from the Orlando Sentinel of all places, read the first sentence of the second paragraph:
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/o...story.html
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2018 12:07 AM by quo vadis.)
|
|
12-03-2018 12:02 AM |
|
templefootballfan
Heisman
Posts: 7,657
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 176
I Root For: TU & BGSU & TEX
Location: CLAYMONT DE Temple T
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
fine UCF fetish
what about Wash St
|
|
12-03-2018 04:12 AM |
|
BruceMcF
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13,263
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 792
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-02-2018 11:48 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote: Don’t like a 9-3 Florida with 2 FCS wins and a 3-TD smoking to Mizzou getting in over a 10-2 Wazzu who lost to USC on objectively sketchy officiating.
Like it or not, "sketchy officiating" is not going to be recognized as an offsetting factor by the CFP committee. They will pretend as if they believe all the calls that didn't actually get apologized for were the correct call.
|
|
12-03-2018 05:40 AM |
|
otown
All American
Posts: 4,194
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 257
I Root For: Florida
Location:
|
RE: NY6 Bowl pairings (non-playoffs)
(12-03-2018 12:02 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 09:22 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 08:41 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-02-2018 04:08 PM)otown Wrote: (12-02-2018 03:27 PM)quo vadis Wrote: It is based on fact. Geography would put UCF vs Florida in the Peach but the Peach did not want UCF.
UCF fans insisted the Peach would want UCF back and i said no way would they want to be stuck with them. I was right.
You are blowing smoke. No fact about it. Bowls do not choose. Selection committees do. That is unless you can provide a source of the Peach bowl coming out and lobbying against UCF. Your 5th cousin on the Peach bowl board does not count.
Now I think you are just being salty and pretty. The committee placed Michigan there due to their higher ranking. They then placed UCF in the Fiesta since they played in the Peach last year. If Michigan or Florida played there last year, they would be left out of there too. That was the committees decision, not the Peach Bowl's. I thought you understood the process. Quo, you are slipping.
This is too simplistic. Yes, the committee decides where teams go in the NY6, not the bowls. But the bowls have input, they can voice concerns.
Bottom line is many UCF fans and others thoughr UCF would go to Peach because of obvious geogeaphic proximity. I correctly said Peach had zero desire to host UCF again and no way would they be in Peach.
I admit it's not entirely anti- UCF. The Peach also got Houston in 2015 and it surely doesn't want to be viewed as the G5 depository.
You seem to be confusing your opinion with fact. Seriously, put up some factual sources. Quoisms are not facts.
If you've posted any facts here I've missed them, but I have one killer fact on my side: I correctly called an outcome that was consistent with my theory before it happened, and in the face of UCF fans and others who insisted the Peach was the destination and that the Peach liked UCF. And I even said I'd eat crow if UCF went to the Peach.
But anyway, here's an article from the Orlando Sentinel of all places, read the first sentence of the second paragraph:
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/o...story.html
Woof, if Mike Bianchi is the best source, run lol. He makes up stories for click bait all the time. Try researching the author and you will understand some of his outlandish columns.
Just a head up, just because something happens, does not mean it happened because of your particular theory. That's not how the world works.
|
|
12-03-2018 05:52 AM |
|