Quote:I reject the idea that winning 9-10 games per year (after we went 13-1) is "dreaming" and unrealistic.
Well PJ, it is unrealistic.
A team goes from 8-4 (+1L) to 7-5 (+1W), to 13-0 (+1L) -- and expecting them to get 9-10W *every year* after that, is unrealistic. When a team hits a peak like that, how often does it sustain 9-10W *every year*?
Quote:But here we are in 2018... totally cool with mediocre football (7-5, 6-6) and making excuses for it.
I take it season by season, and not making excuses for the screw-ups and potentiality to be better. Like losing to BSU and how bad our D was this year (even if so young). Or losing to Both Akron & CMU at home last year. Or getting blown out by SO much to both Toledo & Ohio at home this year.
We should have been better last year overall, and with a bit of a better record (7-5). With such a newer D, assuming we'd have a respectable D Coordinator, we should have been better with an extra win under our belt given so many home games against key opponents + the MAC not in a peak year (and us not having to play Buffalo either).
Just because I chuckle at expecting 9-10W *every year* as "par" -- doesn't mean I liked our 6-6 year right after going 13-1, or that we lived up to what our potential should be this year.
With our schedule notably tougher next year, on the road to two teams that stomped us at home + MACC on the road + feisty EMU on the road in Pepsi Can Alley -- I cannot realistically expect for "par" to be better than 8-4, even though our D should be better improved and our O a bit more polished. 9W is certainly possible, but I can't set that for "par".
Boise? OK. UCF? Huge college with huge budget & fan base -- yeah, I could see that being a year-in-year-out expectation after going undefeated two years in a row. We'd have to work our way up to that level, first. Not just win the MAC in a key year going undefeated in pre-bowl season.
Houston:
- 2013: 8-5
- 2014: 8-5
- 2015: 13-1
- 2016: 9-4
- 2017: 7-5
- 2018: 8-4* (plays Army in bowl)
Cinci:
- 2013: 9-4
- 2014: 9-4
- 2015: 7-6
- 2016: 4-8
- 2017: 4-8
- 2018: 10-2* (plays VA-Tech in bowl)
South Florida:
- 2013: 2-10
- 2014: 4-8
- 2015: 8-5
- 2016: 11-2
- 2017: 10-2
- 2018: 7-5* (plays Marshall in bowl)
Memphis:
- 2013: 3-9
- 2014: 10-3
- 2015: 9-4
- 2016: 8-5
- 2017: 10-3
- 2018: 8-5* (plays Wake Forrest in bowl)
Boise State:
- 2013: 8-5
- 2014: 12-2
- 2015: 9-4
- 2016: 10-3
- 2017: 11-3
- 2018: 10-3* (plays Boston College in bowl)
Fresno State:
- 2013: 11-2
- 2014: 6-8
- 2015: 3-9
- 2016: 1-11
- 2017: 10-4
- 2018: 12-2
San Diego State:
- 2013: 8-5
- 2014: 7-6
- 2015: 11-3
- 2016: 11-3
- 2017: 10-3
- 2018: 7-5* (plays Ohio in bowl)
Marshall (more on par with our program + budget & expectations moving forward):
- 2013: 10-4
- 2014: 13-1
- 2015: 10-3
- 2016: 3-9
- 2017: 8-5
- 2018: 8-4* (plays S Florida in bowl)
Northern Illinois (same concept):
- 2013: 12-2
- 2014: 11-3
- 2015: 8-6
- 2016: 5-7
- 2017: 8-5
- 2018: 8-5* (plays UAB in bowl)
WMU:
- 2013: 1-11
- 2014: 8-5
- 2015: 8-5
- 2016: 13-1
- 2017: 6-6
- 2018: 7-5* (plays BYU in bowl)