This will effect exactly zero Trumpers.

Sad really. If he didn’t have anything to hide he would be truthful about it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...an-embassy


This is why Mueller filed the reports about Manafort lying.

If you had any understanding of where this was heading, you would be crapping your pants instead of celebrating.

Net?

So if he MET with him, what’s the big deal?

I said this when Obama was President and it still stands today. The entire world should be thanking Assange and Wikileaks for what they have done to expose all the corruption in all of these governments - including ours.

(11-27-2018 11:04 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This will effect exactly zero Trumpers.

Sad really. If he didn’t have anything to hide he would be truthful about it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...an-embassy


This is why Mueller filed the reports about Manafort lying.

Bunch of anonymous sources. Worth as much as any anonymous tweet. Zero.
The alternative is that your supposedly non-leaking Mueller is leaking like a sieve.

So which is it? Are you posting fake news or was your claim that Mueller doesn't leak a lie?

And if he met him in 2013 and 2015, why would it be unusual for him to meet in 2016 as well?

And again, this is Assange, not Russia.

(11-27-2018 11:04 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This will effect exactly zero Trumpers.

Sad really. If he didn’t have anything to hide he would be truthful about it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...an-embassy


This is why Mueller filed the reports about Manafort lying.

Or more likely, he's unwilling to "compose" the way Mueller wants him to, so they are trying to violate their plea agreement by saying he's lying. He could be telling the truth and they are just calling a lie because it doesnt fit their narrative.

Wikileaks is denying and the Guardian is quoting the Steele Dossier and anonymous sources. I'll trust wikileaks record of honesty until some proof is provided. It should be easy for the UK to show the proof of him entering the embassy as there are street cameras everywhere. You can't tell me that the UK hasnt been survelling the embassy since Assange went in. There should be video. If they dont have it, its probably a lie.

(11-27-2018 11:24 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 11:04 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This will effect exactly zero Trumpers.

Sad really. If he didn’t have anything to hide he would be truthful about it.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...an-embassy


This is why Mueller filed the reports about Manafort lying.

Or more likely, he's unwilling to "compose" the way Mueller wants him to, so they are trying to violate their plea agreement by saying he's lying. He could be telling the truth and they are just calling a lie because it doesnt fit their narrative.

Wikileaks is denying and the Guardian is quoting the Steele Dossier and anonymous sources. I'll trust wikileaks record of honesty until some proof is provided. It should be easy for the UK to show the proof of him entering the embassy as there are street cameras everywhere. You can't tell me that the UK hasnt been survelling the embassy since Assange went in. There should be video. If they dont have it, its probably a lie.

Exactly. They have to have that embassy under total surveillance 24/7. Hell, its probably bugged inside and out too.

Mueller is always a couple of months ahead. Remember that............

I also chuckle that we wouldn't know any of this if Trump wasn't stupid enough to fire Comey and then say it was because there was nothing to the Russian thing... Total Hoax. Witch Hunt. No collusion.

Just his campaign chair other than that......

and yes Assange is Russia.......................... GRU all the way.... don't be naive

(11-27-2018 11:11 AM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  I said this when Obama was President and it still stands today. The entire world should be thanking Assange and Wikileaks for what they have done to expose all the corruption in all of these governments - including ours.

Yep. And more scary is the fact that Dems or anti Trump types think it is neat that Manafort got arrested and convicted. They don't care about all of the illegal government activity that has been exposed because it was aimed at Trump and protected Hillary & Co.

Aaaaand.. debunked.

Almost an hour. Impressive!

What’s scary is you guys don’t mind having a compromised traitor in the big chair. That is what is scary.

(11-27-2018 12:01 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Aaaaand.. debunked.

Almost an hour. Impressive!

The Guardian is almost CNN level in its TDS. But it sometimes does talk about other things.

Kronke.....


Of course they are going to double down on not being a Russian GRU front....

Would you expect anything else??????

(11-27-2018 12:02 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  What’s scary is you guys don’t mind having a compromised traitor in the big chair. That is what is scary.

actually, whats more scary is that you continue to believe all this nonsense without any shred of evidence.

(11-27-2018 12:02 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  What’s scary is you guys don’t mind having a compromised traitor in the big chair. That is what is scary.

The Traitors are/were DOJ, FBI, CIA, State Dept., etc. But that doesn't bother you because have a D next to the candidates name is above all else.

Change your thread title Mach. May I suggest "I was wrong, again."

No collusion.. with hunt. No links or talks with the Russians......


You guys are so gullible. Drink that Jim Jones kool aid

Pretty sure this would have all been "leaked" when the Obama administration was spying on the Trump campaign.