Alright, this exercise contained a couple of surprises for me. As a reminder, I separate the FBS ranks into top 25% (through #32 on the Massey scale), the next 25% (through #65), and the bottom 50%. Within each grouping, I'm grouping by blowout (21+ points), solid win (8-20 points), close win (7 or fewer points), and losses in that grouping. There's a lot that can be quibbled, but I'm looking for some larger trends.
Code:
Alabama 5-0-1-0 2-0-0-0 5-0-0-0
Clemson 3-0-2-0 4-1-0-0 3-0-0-0
Notre Dame 2-1-3-0 3-0-1-0 1-1-0-0
Oklahoma 0-1-1-1 1-1-2-0 4-1-1-0 (close loss)
Ohio State 2-1-1-0 1-2-2-1 3-0-0-0 (blowout loss in 2nd quadrant)
Michigan 1-1-1-2 3-1-0-0 3-0-0-0 (close loss and blowout loss in 1st quadrant)
Georgia 2-4-0-2 2-0-0-0 3-0-0-0 (close loss and solid loss in 1st quadrant)
UCF 1-0-0-0 1-2-1-0 6-1-0-0
Alabama may have dominated their schedule, but they also played a bunch of patsies.
UCF had an even more lopsided schedule lacking in quality. The only top quadrant win was over Pittsburgh. They were supposed to play UNC, but that wouldn't have helped this year.
Michigan and Georgia appear to have been hurt by their lack of conference championships and 2 losses.
Clemson was solid.
Notre Dame had some squeakers you might not want to see, but they also played 10 games against the top 50% of teams - better than Alabama and Oklahoma. (Big 12 did not measure up at all in Massey - down almost across the board.)
I think many thought Oklahoma delivered some weak wins, but they generally handled everything as expected - a couple closer than maybe average. But Ohio State also showed similar struggles, particularly in that 2nd quadrant. If they had generally delivered solid wins and better in there and didn't have the blowout loss to a middling Purdue, that 4th slot is probably theirs.