From the Dayton Daily News...
https://www.daytondailynews.com/sports/w...O8zVM8tBO/

Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

(11-13-2018 02:19 PM)Screwball Wrote:  Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

On the flip side, can those big guys come out and guard the 3 point line and the dribble drive?

(11-13-2018 02:46 PM)adunifon Wrote:  

(11-13-2018 02:19 PM)Screwball Wrote:  Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

On the flip side, can those big guys come out and guard the 3 point line and the dribble drive?

Certainly shaping up to be an interesting battle of quite different styles of play!

(11-13-2018 02:19 PM)Screwball Wrote:  Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

Our bigs go 240, 215 and 165- what’s the problem? I am thinking we may win the quickness battle.

(11-13-2018 07:51 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(11-13-2018 02:19 PM)Screwball Wrote:  Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

Our bigs go 240, 215 and 165- what’s the problem? I am thinking we may win the quickness battle.

Guard play will make the difference as I believe UT will come out on top, it made be very close.

(11-13-2018 07:51 PM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  

(11-13-2018 02:19 PM)Screwball Wrote:  Projected WS starters go 220, 240, and 280 in the front line. No good news for Toledo.

Our bigs go 240, 215 and 165- what’s the problem? I am thinking we may win the quickness battle.

Edu looks to me, down to 164. Need lechon, stat!