The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(11-10-2018 10:43 PM)gerhard911 Wrote:  

(11-10-2018 05:45 PM)crex043 Wrote:  

(11-10-2018 04:43 PM)gerhard911 Wrote:  No clue about Marvin's salary but willing to bet he's a much better value than Mick.

Marvin has never won in the postseason and doesn't make it every year. No way Marvin is a better value than Mick.

LOL you took the bait. Mick & Marvin both suck and neither can justify their $alaries. Which douche sucks the most is a moot point - they both suck ! Thanks for playing!!!

LULZ you were the one that began by comparing the two based on "value," something that is highly subjective. I simply provided one argument based upon numerical data. I'm guessing you think they both "suck" because neither have advanced to the later stages of the playoffs, which is just, like, your opinion, bro.

(11-10-2018 04:43 PM)gerhard911 Wrote:  No clue about Marvin's salary but willing to bet he's a much better value than Mick.

Marvin's making $4.5M/year for the Bengals. Mick is making $2.25M.