We can only hope that the democrats will lose big in November and we can only hope that justice will be served against these people. I am so sick and tired of hearing about violence, calling for open civil war, and so much more. These people act like it will be a cake walk. Do they not realize the death toll, the destruction a civil war would cause? Are they that inhumane, inconsiderate, and downright stupid?
RE: Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrats 'cannot be civil' with Republicans anymore
(10-10-2018 07:22 PM)hburg Wrote: I am so sick and tired of hearing about violence, calling for open civil war, and so much more. These people act like it will be a cake walk. Do they not realize the death toll, the destruction a civil war would cause?
No, they do not realize any of that. They do not have the slightest clue.
RE: Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrats 'cannot be civil' with Republicans anymore
(10-09-2018 11:22 PM)JRsec Wrote: She is on Colbert tonight saying that the election process is flawed and contrary to the will of the people, and that Trump has put us into an integrity crisis that undermines the White House and comparing it to Watergate.
X presidents and their spouses have always had the decency to keep their mouths shut about the performance of the seated president.
This is just another illustration of why this crass termagant is so heinously destructive to our way of life. No class, no truth, no office. There is a reason she was rejected. Underlying her comments tonight is an assault on the college electoral system and and by implication an assault on our Republic.
Alinsky's method is to so inflame their political target in an unexpected way that they respond in anger thereby making the political target loose credibility in the public's eye. Responding to her any other way but legally will play into her hands. But she and other radical Dems are going to provoke their people into violence and when the law responds they plan on making martyrs out of those they goad into some ridiculous act of violence when the law comes down upon them. Meanwhile she'll cower behind her position and continue to poison the minds of the young.
We have laws against all of this. It's time Trump opened up the investigation on the Clinton's leaks of information to China and try them for treason. It's time to use the law to shut the maw of this shrew.
RE: Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrats 'cannot be civil' with Republicans anymore
She is the best thing that has ever happened to the GOP. The gift that keeps on giving. If folks are still stupid enough to continue to provide her opportunities to expound her propaganda through her stretched out pie hole then that is all the more better for the GOP and the country.
RE: Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrats 'cannot be civil' with Republicans anymore
(10-11-2018 12:20 PM)umbluegray Wrote:
(10-09-2018 11:22 PM)JRsec Wrote: She is on Colbert tonight saying that the election process is flawed and contrary to the will of the people, and that Trump has put us into an integrity crisis that undermines the White House and comparing it to Watergate.
X presidents and their spouses have always had the decency to keep their mouths shut about the performance of the seated president.
This is just another illustration of why this crass termagant is so heinously destructive to our way of life. No class, no truth, no office. There is a reason she was rejected. Underlying her comments tonight is an assault on the college electoral system and and by implication an assault on our Republic.
Alinsky's method is to so inflame their political target in an unexpected way that they respond in anger thereby making the political target loose credibility in the public's eye. Responding to her any other way but legally will play into her hands. But she and other radical Dems are going to provoke their people into violence and when the law responds they plan on making martyrs out of those they goad into some ridiculous act of violence when the law comes down upon them. Meanwhile she'll cower behind her position and continue to poison the minds of the young.
We have laws against all of this. It's time Trump opened up the investigation on the Clinton's leaks of information to China and try them for treason. It's time to use the law to shut the maw of this shrew.
She knows all about lying during watergate.
She's an old pro by now.
do away with the electoral college, impeach trump, pack the supreme court, strip your right to own firearms, no birder, citizenship not required to vote in U.S. elections... am I missing any of Hillary Clinton's core beliefs? does this sound good to any rational person?
or should this DEMon be imprisoned for for Whitwater, Benghazi, Uranium One, and the FISA abuses against an incoming President and his administration.
They are beating us in the streets, shooting us in the ball field, they are chasing old people based on skin color, they are bringing flase charges against us...then they call for more violence....
Why the fvck should we stand down?
somebody tell me.
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2018 02:16 PM by No Bull.)
If Holder had been honest, he would have said, "When they win a presidency via the constitutionally mandated route and the duly elected president nominates a Supreme Court justice with a 12-year exceptional record on the bench and then the duly elected Senate follows all the rules and precedents set by Democrats -- offering numerous hearings and investigations along the way -- and confirms that nominee, we kick them, because we're frustrated....""
But the problem is that Democrats have a bad habit of acting as if every political setback they experience is caused by some act of criminality. This instigates lots people to act like a bunch of children -- or worse.
When Democrats lose the House, it's because of mythical unilateral gerrymandering or mythical mass voter suppression. When they lose the Senate, it's because the system suddenly became an antiquated relic of the 1700s. When they lose the Supreme Court, there is a "legitimacy crisis." When they lost the 2000 election, it was because it had been stolen by the Supreme Court. When they lost in 2004, George W. Bush had rigged the election in Ohio. When they lost in 2016, omnipotent Russians and the unfair Electoral College had snatched the office from its preordained owner.
And every legislative action that fails to comport with liberal thinking is to them an apocalyptic event and the end of "democracy...."
If Holder had been honest, he would have said, "When they win a presidency via the constitutionally mandated route and the duly elected president nominates a Supreme Court justice with a 12-year exceptional record on the bench and then the duly elected Senate follows all the rules and precedents set by Democrats -- offering numerous hearings and investigations along the way -- and confirms that nominee, we kick them, because we're frustrated....""
But the problem is that Democrats have a bad habit of acting as if every political setback they experience is caused by some act of criminality. This instigates lots people to act like a bunch of children -- or worse.
When Democrats lose the House, it's because of mythical unilateral gerrymandering or mythical mass voter suppression. When they lose the Senate, it's because the system suddenly became an antiquated relic of the 1700s. When they lose the Supreme Court, there is a "legitimacy crisis." When they lost the 2000 election, it was because it had been stolen by the Supreme Court. When they lost in 2004, George W. Bush had rigged the election in Ohio. When they lost in 2016, omnipotent Russians and the unfair Electoral College had snatched the office from its preordained owner.
And every legislative action that fails to comport with liberal thinking is to them an apocalyptic event and the end of "democracy...."