https://nypost.com/2018/09/30/california...te-boards/

"....The measure requires at least one female director on each board of California-based corporations by the end of next year. Companies would need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the number of board seats.....

The law applies to companies that report having their principal executive offices in California. Companies can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for subsequent violations...."

(09-30-2018 07:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://nypost.com/2018/09/30/california...te-boards/

"....The measure requires at least one female director on each board of California-based corporations by the end of next year. Companies would need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the number of board seats.....

The law applies to companies that report having their principal executive offices in California. Companies can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for subsequent violations...."

To be clear this is not a quota system. What next 3 African American board members, 3 gay board members, 3 transsexual board members... where will it end?

(09-30-2018 07:25 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-30-2018 07:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://nypost.com/2018/09/30/california...te-boards/

"....The measure requires at least one female director on each board of California-based corporations by the end of next year. Companies would need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the number of board seats.....

The law applies to companies that report having their principal executive offices in California. Companies can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for subsequent violations...."

To be clear this is not a quota system. What next 3 African American board members, 3 gay board members, 3 transsexual board members... where will it end?

With California, who knows?

(09-30-2018 07:25 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-30-2018 07:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://nypost.com/2018/09/30/california...te-boards/

"....The measure requires at least one female director on each board of California-based corporations by the end of next year. Companies would need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the number of board seats.....

The law applies to companies that report having their principal executive offices in California. Companies can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for subsequent violations...."

To be clear this is not a quota system. What next 3 African American board members, 3 gay board members, 3 transsexual board members... where will it end?

Must be born in another country. American born not allowed to serve on a board.

one cannot laugh hard enough at this quota entanglement.....

thank the good goodies I don't live in or visit cali anymore.....

@tittyIx

California politicians are bound and determined to make Cali the model state version of Cuba.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

All they would need is for one board member to "self identify" as a woman, and they get this done.

Stupid Cali.

Quote:“I don’t minimize the potential flaws that indeed may prove fatal to its ultimate implementation,” Brown wrote in a signing statement. “Nevertheless, recent events in Washington, D.C. — and beyond — make it crystal clear that many are not getting the message.”

"We know this isn't legal, but Donald Trump."

(09-30-2018 07:22 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://nypost.com/2018/09/30/california...te-boards/

"....The measure requires at least one female director on each board of California-based corporations by the end of next year. Companies would need up to three female directors by the end of 2021, depending on the number of board seats.....

The law applies to companies that report having their principal executive offices in California. Companies can be fined $100,000 for a first violation and $300,000 for subsequent violations...."

Identity politics invades the private sector....

Yeah, let's NOT hire the best, most qualified people, we'll hire based on what boxes you tick on the PC checklist.

If that's the case, why stop at women?

Require....

At least one person from an alternative gender
At least person from a non traditional sexual orientation
At least one person who's race, creed, or color is non European based
At least one person who is an "undocumented immigrant"
At least one person who is habitat displaced
At least one person who lives an Organic, Non-GMO, Gluten free lifestyle
At least one person who exercises their "right" to partake in THC based products
At least one person who has been "victim" to unfair sentencing practices and therefore has a felony record

That should just about eliminate the need for the pesky white guys.

remember when California meant tall beautiful tanned blondes in european sports cars? i remember.

sad, bigly

It will not hold up.

(10-01-2018 07:27 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It will not hold up.

Its clearly unconstitutional, but I don't think anyone will try to challenge it. California is the same way with their taxes. They keep trying to do things that have been ruled illegal by the courts.

Stalinists.