8 Minutes from radio show

Any summary?

This guy needs to come forward.

(09-26-2018 05:04 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  8 Minutes from radio show

Quote:In the wake of the 3rd Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick's identity becoming public through her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, The Kuhner Report received a call from a man who identified himself as "Thomas in Boston," whose family knew the Swetnicks "Well" in Maryland, and discussed the known "Issues of Substance abuse," and "Mental Issues from Julie." He detailed a phone call from his sister this morning, who still lives in Maryland, where she said "Can you imagine a more delusional whack job is the one that came forward against Kavanaugh?"

"Thomas" also went on to describe the are where they grew up in Montgomery Village, "Quite a distance from Bethesda" and that the "Social circles" would not have interacted. He refutes that during High School "No way that she would have encountered these same social circles, certainly not during High School."

He did say the information he received was "Second hand," as it came from family members, but, he also offered details of the Swetnicks and his own family that lend credence to his story.

(09-26-2018 05:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  Any summary?

Was her neighbor as kids. Knew the family and said she was nuts.

She also was sued for domestic violence and has $100,000 in liens.
Link

(09-26-2018 05:17 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  She also was sued for domestic violence and has $100,000 in liens.
Link

So, if some Creepy Porn Lawyer was to pay her let's say $100,000 for a statement about Kavanaugh, it would help her out of some serious financial and legal problems.....

I know background checks vary, but how did she pass them if she's a tax cheat, especially anything at US Treasury.

(09-26-2018 05:20 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:17 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  She also was sued for domestic violence and has $100,000 in liens.
Link

So, if some Creepy Porn Lawyer was to pay her let's say $100,000 for a statement about Kavanaugh, it would help her out of some serious financial and legal problems.....

I know background checks vary, but how did she pass them if she's a tax cheat, especially anything at US Treasury.

Why do you assume that part of her statement is true?

(09-26-2018 05:12 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:04 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  8 Minutes from radio show

Quote:In the wake of the 3rd Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick's identity becoming public through her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, The Kuhner Report received a call from a man who identified himself as "Thomas in Boston," whose family knew the Swetnicks "Well" in Maryland, and discussed the known "Issues of Substance abuse," and "Mental Issues from Julie." He detailed a phone call from his sister this morning, who still lives in Maryland, where she said "Can you imagine a more delusional whack job is the one that came forward against Kavanaugh?"

"Thomas" also went on to describe the are where they grew up in Montgomery Village, "Quite a distance from Bethesda" and that the "Social circles" would not have interacted. He refutes that during High School "No way that she would have encountered these same social circles, certainly not during High School."

He did say the information he received was "Second hand," as it came from family members, but, he also offered details of the Swetnicks and his own family that lend credence to his story.

Now you see, this is how the game should be played. You bring your wingnut to the table making outrageous claims, I'll bring my wingnut to table making outragous claims against your wingnut. No one can prove a damned thing so fight fire with fire.

(09-26-2018 05:24 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:20 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:17 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  She also was sued for domestic violence and has $100,000 in liens.
Link

So, if some Creepy Porn Lawyer was to pay her let's say $100,000 for a statement about Kavanaugh, it would help her out of some serious financial and legal problems.....

I know background checks vary, but how did she pass them if she's a tax cheat, especially anything at US Treasury.

Why do you assume that part of her statement is true?

Because Creepy Porn Lawyer said so.

(09-26-2018 05:20 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:17 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  She also was sued for domestic violence and has $100,000 in liens.
Link

So, if some Creepy Porn Lawyer was to pay her let's say $100,000 for a statement about Kavanaugh, it would help her out of some serious financial and legal problems.....

I know background checks vary, but how did she pass them if she's a tax cheat, especially anything at US Treasury.

Because she was investigated by the same people who investigated Cankles and Trump-Russian collusion.

(09-26-2018 05:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:12 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 05:04 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  8 Minutes from radio show

Quote:In the wake of the 3rd Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick's identity becoming public through her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, The Kuhner Report received a call from a man who identified himself as "Thomas in Boston," whose family knew the Swetnicks "Well" in Maryland, and discussed the known "Issues of Substance abuse," and "Mental Issues from Julie." He detailed a phone call from his sister this morning, who still lives in Maryland, where she said "Can you imagine a more delusional whack job is the one that came forward against Kavanaugh?"

"Thomas" also went on to describe the are where they grew up in Montgomery Village, "Quite a distance from Bethesda" and that the "Social circles" would not have interacted. He refutes that during High School "No way that she would have encountered these same social circles, certainly not during High School."

He did say the information he received was "Second hand," as it came from family members, but, he also offered details of the Swetnicks and his own family that lend credence to his story.

Now you see, this is how the game should be played. You bring your wingnut to the table making outrageous claims, I'll bring my wingnut to table making outragous claims against your wingnut. No one can prove a damned thing so fight fire with fire.

Huge difference...

MSM will not touch this or even try to reach out to this person. Hell they wouldn't do it even if they had a phone number, name and address. They are too busy running articles for the low hanging fruit that will **** their pants over talke about calling someone fat while in HS....those like David St, CB and the other two trolls on here.

There could be 10 people saying all or any of those were made up claims and the MSM would not touch it.

That's why if this is reversed in a few years it will never have the chance to do damage like we are seeing today. The MSM will take the other side and say they want proof, not he or she said.