Put Gowdy out there to ask the questions and have a tee time for 12:15.

(09-23-2018 01:06 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  These Senators will not ask her any question that is attacking......


they are more afraid of how the media will portray them than trying to get at the truth or at least asking some hard questions. No matter what's said if she testifies the headlines will be Senator so and so attacks sexual assaulted teen. No woman should have to defend themselves or prove anything. It's bad enough that she had to live with this nightmare for 35 years of attempted rape and murder.

You can go ahead and write the headlines and story today...to the press anything she says is 100% God's honest truth. It wont matter if the other 4 people named dont remember it and denied even being there

Last I heard it seems that staff attorneys will be doing the questioning, right? This way there is no video of the evil Senators being mean.

(09-23-2018 05:29 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-23-2018 01:06 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  These Senators will not ask her any question that is attacking......


they are more afraid of how the media will portray them than trying to get at the truth or at least asking some hard questions. No matter what's said if she testifies the headlines will be Senator so and so attacks sexual assaulted teen. No woman should have to defend themselves or prove anything. It's bad enough that she had to live with this nightmare for 35 years of attempted rape and murder.

You can go ahead and write the headlines and story today...to the press anything she says is 100% God's honest truth. It wont matter if the other 4 people named dont remember it and denied even being there

Last I heard it seems that staff attorneys will be doing the questioning, right? This way there is no video of the evil Senators being mean.

Then you have a female attorney for the Republicans questioning her.

(09-23-2018 08:58 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-23-2018 05:29 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-23-2018 01:06 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  These Senators will not ask her any question that is attacking......


they are more afraid of how the media will portray them than trying to get at the truth or at least asking some hard questions. No matter what's said if she testifies the headlines will be Senator so and so attacks sexual assaulted teen. No woman should have to defend themselves or prove anything. It's bad enough that she had to live with this nightmare for 35 years of attempted rape and murder.

You can go ahead and write the headlines and story today...to the press anything she says is 100% God's honest truth. It wont matter if the other 4 people named dont remember it and denied even being there

Last I heard it seems that staff attorneys will be doing the questioning, right? This way there is no video of the evil Senators being mean.

Then you have a female attorney for the Republicans questioning her.

Bingo. I'd make sure it was African American or Latina women as well to stop the other obvious knee jerk reaction.

With all the FACTS now known, why are they even having a hearing? Just go to the room, lay out the facts and go ahead and vote.

(09-23-2018 11:47 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  With all the FACTS now known, why are they even having a hearing? Just go to the room, lay out the facts and go ahead and vote.

McCarthy made the same argument. Its all for show. It won't get to "truth."

(09-22-2018 10:12 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Even though it’s said they’ve come to an agreement for Thursday, based on her nonsense, I have to believe the odds of her actually showing is still less than 10%. Tuesday-Wednesday, there will be a new excuse.

feinstein calls for Thursday to be cancelled. In retrospect, my call of 10% was a little high.

I say they just vote on it.

I don't know who the Republican leadership think they are playing to.

The only people who have any real interest in these allegations do so because they are either total liberal nut jobs or because they are playing politics.

The Republican base, and a considerable portion of independents, want the show over.

(09-23-2018 11:47 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  With all the FACTS now known, why are they even having a hearing? Just go to the room, lay out the facts and go ahead and vote.

"Lay out" may have been a poor choice of words...



But honestly, not joking, I was a keen observer nerd of the impeachment of the rapist in chief, the bubba. Watched all of that, even got middle finger "fly-swatted" straight up in the middle of the forehead from lovely and talented Mrs. Dunks roommate at the time, lovely girl at the time btw, who was all in on the clintoon lunacy. (Course now he, clinton, not she, looks rather sane by comparison... ).

Look, anyone being honest here (or anywhere else) sees exactly WTF is going on here. It's Dingy Reid "Well, he didn't get elected, right?" allll the f@#*&^$%#@#% over again.

Lie like the lying liars that lie always do, then hope that something sticks. Hitch your hiddie to that post and hang on for the best.

Why has everyone else named spoken under oath, but not the complainant/plaintiff?

Odd, that, No?

Why postpone? She knew she would vote no before he was even picked.