(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:13 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  Could have said the same thing about your commuter school when you were going 0-fer in football and sucking it up in basketball. Just get over yourself. Just cause you have a good team this year doesn’t mean it’s guaranteed next year.

it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

Will chalk it up to newcomer mad at the voices in his head.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:13 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  Could have said the same thing about your commuter school when you were going 0-fer in football and sucking it up in basketball. Just get over yourself. Just cause you have a good team this year doesn’t mean it’s guaranteed next year.

it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And beat the pants off Memphis.

(09-16-2018 01:34 PM)I_LUV_MEMPHISTIGERS Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And beat the pants off Memphis.

With everything our programs go through and all rivalry aside, why would anyone want to see another program fail. Don't get it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(09-16-2018 01:34 PM)I_LUV_MEMPHISTIGERS Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And beat the pants off Memphis.

Got screwed by refs twice or we would have been at least 11-1. Can’t say how we would have faired against a tougher bowl opponent.

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:15 PM)Doglando Wrote:  it goes beyond performance. all about potential. tulsa is just too limited in recruiting base and fan support. nothing personal

You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

i provided quite a few reasons why these schools are a legit detriment to the conference. are you able to provide any points to the contrary on how tulsa provides value to the other schools in the conference? or just petty insults

(09-16-2018 01:43 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

i provided quite a few reasons why these schools are a legit detriment to the conference. are you able to provide any points to the contrary on how tulsa provides value to the other schools in the conference? or just petty insults

Our recruiting is fine, you guys get a bunch of overhyped Florida kids that don’t always on out. Evidence, Tulsa beating you twice in conference championships. We do provide eyes for the conference as our games in prime time are watched at a decent rate when we’re good and not buried on a subscription only channel. Finally, Tulsa does, in fact, have room to grow it’s brand. We have a large Metro, and if we finally get a team that can take down some of the big boys we play (Texas) etc... we will get many more butts in seats. So far, the timing has been off. Our 2016 team would have destroyed this schedule and probably played for a conference championship.

(09-16-2018 01:43 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:18 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  You're wrong here, my man. And nobody puts Tulsa in the corner.

how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

i provided quite a few reasons why these schools are a legit detriment to the conference. are you able to provide any points to the contrary on how tulsa provides value to the other schools in the conference? or just petty insults

No you have not . Winning today has zero to do with realignment. Ask Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers and Maryland. Football can turnaround one year to the next. That is the least important component. Kind of like going 0-12 one year and then 6-7 and then 13-0. The people who actually make decisions looked at the full picture and decided on the schools currently in the AAC. There is much more to it and thankfully they didn't make knee jerk reactions like you are making. They are Tier One research universities. They also get you Tulsa and New Orleans media wise. Also because of travel 12 with 6 on each division works better. Probably a whole host of behind the scenes reasons as well that we will never be privy to.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(09-16-2018 01:56 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:43 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  how am I wrong? they are routinely outrecruited by sun belt schools and their games do indeed have a high school feel

Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

i provided quite a few reasons why these schools are a legit detriment to the conference. are you able to provide any points to the contrary on how tulsa provides value to the other schools in the conference? or just petty insults

No you have not . Winning today has zero to do with realignment. Ask Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers and Maryland. Football can turnaround one year to the next. That is the least important component. Kind of like going 0-12 one year and then 6-7 and then 13-0. The people who actually make decisions looked at the full picture and decided on the schools currently in the AAC. There is much more to it and thankfully they didn't make knee jerk reactions like you are making. They are Tier One research universities. They also get you Tulsa and New Orleans media wise. Also because of travel 12 with 6 on each division works better. Probably a whole host of behind the scenes reasons as well that we will never be privy to.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

i completely agree on the winning part. i place potential much higher than recent performance. rutgers and maryland added critical markets to the BTN, pitt and cuse have a history of elite MBB programs. 4 awful comparisons.

Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

(09-16-2018 02:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

the jamie dixon era at pitt, when they were added to the ACC, was absolutely elite

5 seed
3 seed
4 seed
1 seed
3 seed
1 seed

those are in consecutive seasons

(09-16-2018 02:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 02:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

the jamie dixon era at pitt, when they were added to the ACC, was absolutely elite

5 seed
3 seed
4 seed
1 seed
3 seed
1 seed

those are in consecutive seasons

Just stop. 1 Final Four...in 1941!

Elite???

Hold my weave...

(09-16-2018 02:08 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:56 PM)panama Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:43 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:32 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 01:29 PM)panama Wrote:  Didn't they got 10-3 just two years ago?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He’s just mad that their games in their erector set stadium have a Mickey Mouse feel, like they’re trying to make people believe they’re looking at something they’re clearly not.

i provided quite a few reasons why these schools are a legit detriment to the conference. are you able to provide any points to the contrary on how tulsa provides value to the other schools in the conference? or just petty insults

No you have not . Winning today has zero to do with realignment. Ask Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers and Maryland. Football can turnaround one year to the next. That is the least important component. Kind of like going 0-12 one year and then 6-7 and then 13-0. The people who actually make decisions looked at the full picture and decided on the schools currently in the AAC. There is much more to it and thankfully they didn't make knee jerk reactions like you are making. They are Tier One research universities. They also get you Tulsa and New Orleans media wise. Also because of travel 12 with 6 on each division works better. Probably a whole host of behind the scenes reasons as well that we will never be privy to.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

i completely agree on the winning part. i place potential much higher than recent performance. rutgers and maryland added critical markets to the BTN, pitt and cuse have a history of elite MBB programs. 4 awful comparisons.

No, you're just seeing what you want to see and are thinking your business decisions would be better than those paid millions to actually make these business decisions.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(09-16-2018 02:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 02:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

the jamie dixon era at pitt, when they were added to the ACC, was absolutely elite

5 seed
3 seed
4 seed
1 seed
3 seed
1 seed

those are in consecutive seasons

you had a pretty decent troll rolling but

(09-16-2018 02:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 02:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

the jamie dixon era at pitt, when they were added to the ACC, was absolutely elite

5 seed
3 seed
4 seed
1 seed
3 seed
1 seed

those are in consecutive seasons

And yet in football were as mediocre in their last five years in the Big East as you claim Tulsa and Tulane are now.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(09-16-2018 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 02:20 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 02:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Pitt is not an elite MBB program. That's just ridiculous.

the jamie dixon era at pitt, when they were added to the ACC, was absolutely elite

5 seed
3 seed
4 seed
1 seed
3 seed
1 seed

those are in consecutive seasons

you had a pretty decent troll rolling but

She a funny gurl.

getting caught up in semantics. so pitt had a very good, but not elite, mbb program. doesnt matter because the comparison does not apply with tulsa and the aac in any way. have a nice day all

(09-16-2018 02:32 PM)Doglando Wrote:  getting caught up in semantics. so pitt had a very good, but not elite, mbb program. doesnt matter because the comparison does not apply with tulsa and the aac in any way. have a nice day all

TTFN

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

As a Memphis fan, I view Tulsa and Tulane football games as competitive. Tulsa usually gets back up quickly. Tulane just seems to stagnate this year but here's hoping they improve with experience.

Nobody's getting kicked out. The only schools that haven't been mentioned to throw out by some posters at some point are Houston, Cincy, and UCF.

(09-16-2018 03:41 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  As a Memphis fan, I view Tulsa and Tulane football games as competitive. Tulsa usually gets back up quickly. Tulane just seems to stagnate this year but here's hoping they improve with experience.

Nobody's getting kicked out. The only schools that haven't been mentioned to throw out by some posters at some point are Houston, Cincy, and UCF.

Fake News!

I voted to evict everyone in this conference at least once!