Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Odd idea to fix College Football, Promotion/relegation
Author Message
The Colonel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,142
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 31
I Root For: WMU Broncos
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Post: #21
RE: Odd idea to fix College Football, Promotion/relegation
(08-23-2018 06:40 AM)RobtheAggie Wrote:  I do not see the Independent schools in your plan. Would they be shut out, or where would they end up?

Although my idea was specific to the MAC, C-USA, and SB, I did mention that I'd be totally in favor of independents such as NMSU coming on board if one of the 36 schools went to another conference.

One tweak of my idea to address potential travel concerns would be to go to a three-division format with 12 teams, with each division divided into a six-team North and a six-team South. Using my previous example, it might look something like this:

Gold Division (4 MAC, 4 C-USA, 4 SB)
North: Toledo, NIU, WMU, WKU, CMU, Marshall
South: App St, Ark St, La Tech, MTSU, Ga So, Louisiana

Silver Division (4 MAC, 5 C-USA, 3 SB)
North: Ohio, ODU, BG, Akron, Miami, Ga St
South: Troy, So Miss, FAU, FIU, UTSA, S. Alabama

Bronze Division (4 MAC, 5 C-USA, 3 SB)
North: Buffalo, EMU, Ball State, Kent State, Charlotte, Coastal Car.
South: N. Texas, Rice, La-Monroe, UTEP, Texas St, UAB

Using this format, over a two-year period, each school would play its geographic divisional opponents one year at home and the other year on the road. Each school would also play three divisional crossover opponents one year and the other three divisional crossover opponents the next year. After two years, the top team in each geographic division would move up and the bottom team in each geographic division would move down.

I'd also prefer a guaranteed game each year for rivals that are in the same division, but different geographic breakdowns (for example, WKU-MTSU). Those two rivals would play one year that would count in the divisional standings for relegation purposes. Their guaranteed "rival/proximity" game for the other year would ensure that they still get to play their rivalry game, but the result that year would not count in the divisional standings for relegation purposes.

I like the original idea better because every school would play every other school in the division over a two-year period, but this option definitely improves the geographic concerns for the vast majority of schools.
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2018 11:53 PM by The Colonel.)
08-23-2018 11:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.