that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

did you even read that poorly written article. come on man, i expect better.

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

So 3 Russians didn't prove their libel claim and it's a bad day for Trump?

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

lol....not to mention Steele admitted that its probably at least 50% fake in a deposition in the UK. Of course, I get it. Any democrat who had only 50% fake campaign promises would be considered a brutally honest candidate by most members of that party.

(08-21-2018 06:46 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

So 3 Russians didn't prove their libel claim and it's a bad day for Trump?

Not even that. The judge never determined whether or not it was true or fake. He just said Steele was protected by the first amendment.

Here's the excerpt:
On Monday, a judge in the District of Columbia, Anthony C Epstein, upheld a motion by Steele to have the oligarchs’ case thrown out. Epstein did not determine whether the dossier – which Donald Trump has repeatedly dismissed as “fake” – was “accurate or not accurate”.

OP doesn't know how libel/defamation works.

Cracks me up when I see a foreign use our courts against us!
**** us for playing!

(08-21-2018 06:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

lol....not to mention Steele admitted that its probably at least 50% fake in a deposition in the UK. Of course, I get it. Any democrat who had only 50% fake campaign promises would be considered a brutally honest candidate by most members of that party.

Please show citations for this claim or retract. Your statement on the 50%is a blatant non truth.

(08-21-2018 07:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  OP doesn't know how libel/defamation works.

He should really stick to posting the stir pot thingy.

(08-21-2018 08:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

lol....not to mention Steele admitted that its probably at least 50% fake in a deposition in the UK. Of course, I get it. Any democrat who had only 50% fake campaign promises would be considered a brutally honest candidate by most members of that party.

Please show citations for this claim or retract. Your statement on the 50%is a blatant non truth.

Bump.... please show a citation.

(08-21-2018 08:22 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 07:34 PM)Kronke Wrote:  OP doesn't know how libel/defamation works.

He should really stick to posting the stir pot thingy.

or revive the 'bizzle....both are his best 'assets'.....

(08-23-2018 05:59 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

lol....not to mention Steele admitted that its probably at least 50% fake in a deposition in the UK. Of course, I get it. Any democrat who had only 50% fake campaign promises would be considered a brutally honest candidate by most members of that party.

Please show citations for this claim or retract. Your statement on the 50%is a blatant non truth.

Bump.... please show a citation.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...unverifie/

Even Lanny Davis says it’s false.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/22/lanny-...en-prague/

(08-23-2018 05:59 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 08:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:51 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 06:38 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  that Steele won a lawsuit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018...her-steele

Quote:The former MI6 officer Christopher Steele has won a legal battle in the United States against three Russian oligarchs who sued him over allegations made in his dossier about the Trump campaign and its links with Moscow.

Shall we call this losing Tuesday. It's a bad day to be a bot.

lol....not to mention Steele admitted that its probably at least 50% fake in a deposition in the UK. Of course, I get it. Any democrat who had only 50% fake campaign promises would be considered a brutally honest candidate by most members of that party.

Please show citations for this claim or retract. Your statement on the 50%is a blatant non truth.

Bump.... please show a citation.

The deposition is sealed, but I recall similar figures. Not sure if it applied to all the dossier or certain parts.

thevdailycaller is not a credible site. Please use a different source.

Definition of unverified

: not verified : lacking substantiation


I think you need a dictionary. The Washington Times article clearly states parts are unverified. That is not fake.

(08-23-2018 07:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  thevdailycaller is not a credible site. Please use a different source.

The video in the link comes from Bloomberg news and it's Lanny Davis himself speaking. Are you suggesting DailyCaller faked the video?