If there was any remaining doubt, big tech is making their move. This is them putting their thumbs on the scale in effort to influence the midterms. The video below with Allie Stuckey has 3+ million views and is still up (at least for now) on Youtube, but was deleted from FB for "hate speech".

You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

Actually, if there was a market for far right propaganda in social media, then someone would fill the market, right?

And if the GOP really wanted to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the GOP would stop gerrymandering and making it harder for people to vote and creating more onerous requirements for poorer voters to access the ballot.

Actually USA.Life is a new startup that is intended to compete with FB., conservatives will have freedom there.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(08-17-2018 06:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

Actually, if there was a market for far right propaganda in social media, then someone would fill the market, right?

And if the GOP really wanted to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the GOP would stop gerrymandering and making it harder for people to vote and creating more onerous requirements for poorer voters to access the ballot.

When did lefties get so trustful of big corporations having so much power over what content people see from a major medium of information?

I guess it's okay when it's happening to people you don't like, right?

BTW, Prager isn't "far right".

(08-17-2018 06:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

Actually, if there was a market for far right propaganda in social media, then someone would fill the market, right?

And if the GOP really wanted to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the GOP would stop gerrymandering and making it harder for people to vote and creating more onerous requirements for poorer voters to access the ballot.

How is Make Men Masculine Again “far right”, much less propaganda?

Facebook and Twitter advertised themselves as platforms for all wings of speech, and now are pulling the rug out from under their users. Users that make their company, by the way, it’s not like they produce anything.

Interestingly enough, both also just suffered 20-30% losses in value.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That Youtube video Make Men Masculine Again showed me just how masculine we aren't or think we aren't. I watch Family Feud and one of the questions was "how masculine are you?" and the contestants said 8 and 7 but the number one answer was one. Can you believe that? Heck, my wife is higher than a 1 but these men in the audience don't think they are. What a bunch of snowflakes.

The right is having high-profile, interesting conversations with people from all over the political spectrum.

The alt-left is circling the wagons, anastasia cortez refuses to debate (even for money donated to a charity of her choice) after claiming conservatives are afraid to debate, is banning the media from her town halls, and they are trying to ban any and every thing that doesn’t 100% toe the SJW line.

Their ideas can’t compete.

Tucker just nailed it.

“Confident people don’t act this way. Insecure, terrified ones do.”

Edit: What a brilliant monologue. Video coming whenever it is posted.

(08-17-2018 06:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

Actually, if there was a market for far right propaganda in social media, then someone would fill the market, right?

And if the GOP really wanted to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the GOP would stop gerrymandering and making it harder for people to vote and creating more onerous requirements for poorer voters to access the ballot.

You win the daily double for non sequiturs!

1st paragraph: until the very recent Facebook-Twitter assault on conservative viewpoints, there wasn't a need for ideological-oriented social media. It was only because progressive logic couldn't hold up on its own that the anointed guardians of acceptable thought decided to get into the censorship business. Give it time, and the competing right-leaning social media outlets will arise.

2nd paragraph: seriously, Tom, how does the desperate desire of progressives to manufacture votes from people who are otherwise incapable or unwilling to meet basic requirements have anything whatsoever to do with left-wing censorship? I've seen a lot of loose thinking on this forum, but this one really takes the prize.

(08-17-2018 07:14 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 06:03 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

Actually, if there was a market for far right propaganda in social media, then someone would fill the market, right?

And if the GOP really wanted to compete in the marketplace of ideas, the GOP would stop gerrymandering and making it harder for people to vote and creating more onerous requirements for poorer voters to access the ballot.

You win the daily double for non sequiturs!

1st paragraph: until the very recent Facebook-Twitter assault on conservative viewpoints, there wasn't a need for ideological-oriented social media. It was only because progressive logic couldn't hold up on its own that the anointed guardians of acceptable thought decided to get into the censorship business. Give it time, and the competing right-leaning social media outlets will arise.

2nd paragraph: seriously, Tom, how does the desperate desire of progressives to manufacture votes from people who are otherwise incapable or unwilling to meet basic requirements have anything whatsoever to do with left-wing censorship? I've seen a lot of loose thinking on this forum, but this one really takes the prize.

Democrats know that lazy, uniformed people are more likely to vote Democrat. So they are desperately trying to make it easier for those people.

(08-17-2018 05:09 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  You guys are welcome to create your own social networking sites. Quite frankly, that would be very helpful anyway. Good luck getting anyone but the converted to switch from facebook and twitter.

That's all very true, Lazy Tom.

But it's quite the indictment of the progressive ideology that it cannot hold its own in the market of free expression without prior restraint from our media and technology betters.

They are in line with islam, don’t want any competing ideas. People just might be influenced so don’t let them hear it. Trouble is once they get what they want, as with islam, most of the believers-revolutionarys get shot.

How many Bolsheviks died in the aftermath of their great revolution? About 20,000,000?
A good dose of socialism-communism will do wonders for global warming and population control.

(08-17-2018 07:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Tucker just nailed it.

“Confident people don’t act this way. Insecure, terrified ones do.”

Edit: What a brilliant monologue. Video coming whenever it is posted.

surprisingly, I was able to catch that.....it was absolutely spot-on....

you could tell he and his staff spent serious time and thought coming up with that one....

it's been funny watching Tuck go from the bow tie to the 'manly' one....

he's not as quick as Shap, but they're basically two peas in a pod....

oopsie muh algorithms.

The tech companies can do this to anyone, and wait to gauge the reaction before just saying it was an accident.

I saw a far-left wing journalist got banned from twitter yesterday for merely insulting John McCain (no bad words were used), and ShareBlue went after her. So, it isn’t just conservatives. I can't wait until it's someone Tom likes.

(08-18-2018 04:16 PM)Kronke Wrote:  oopsie muh algorithms.

The tech companies can do this to anyone, and wait to gauge the reaction before just saying it was an accident.

I saw a far-left wing journalist got banned from twitter yesterday for merely insulting John McCain (no bad words were used), and ShareBlue went after her. So, it's just just conservatives. I can't wait until it's someone Tom likes.

the obvious 'shadow banning' is alarming relative to free speech.....more specifically when conservative in nature.....

the one shining grace is they're getting called out and responding.....

if I was running the show, it never would've happened to begin with.....

but I don't run that show.....

If I were on the board, I'd call the president in on the carpet and ask why he was trying to alienate half of our customers.

Prayer U. Is just meant to inform. They are not an activist group and their style is very benign and non confrontation. If they are being censored, many more will go down.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk