Quote:I believe that I, like Carter Page and Paul Manafort, was subject to an illegal FISA warrant in 2016, as the New York Times reported on January 20, 2017. The New York Times published this claim in a page-one story on the same day as President Trump’s inauguration ceremony.

A whistleblower has told my lawyers where my name and the fact that application had been made for a FISA warrant on me was redacted from the stunning Carter Page FISA warrant application released by the FBI last week with 300 of 400 pages blacked out.

A FISA warrant can only be issued against a U.S. Citizen who is engaged in espionage for a foreign power against the United States. I have never engaged in any such thing.

In other words, heavy-handed federal prosecutors have had full access to my e-mails, text messages and cell calls since 2016 and are monitoring my communications now, and they still have no evidence of Russian collusion or any Wikileaks collaboration.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/13/roger-...collusion/

(08-13-2018 09:34 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:I believe that I, like Carter Page and Paul Manafort, was subject to an illegal FISA warrant in 2016, as the New York Times reported on January 20, 2017. The New York Times published this claim in a page-one story on the same day as President Trump’s inauguration ceremony.

A whistleblower has told my lawyers where my name and the fact that application had been made for a FISA warrant on me was redacted from the stunning Carter Page FISA warrant application released by the FBI last week with 300 of 400 pages blacked out.

A FISA warrant can only be issued against a U.S. Citizen who is engaged in espionage for a foreign power against the United States. I have never engaged in any such thing.

In other words, heavy-handed federal prosecutors have had full access to my e-mails, text messages and cell calls since 2016 and are monitoring my communications now, and they still have no evidence of Russian collusion or any Wikileaks collaboration.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/13/roger-...collusion/

BOOM. Im telling you---documents are coming. The will be completely declassified by the president, with no redactions, and available to the public in late October. Just you wait and see.

(08-14-2018 01:12 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-13-2018 09:34 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:I believe that I, like Carter Page and Paul Manafort, was subject to an illegal FISA warrant in 2016, as the New York Times reported on January 20, 2017. The New York Times published this claim in a page-one story on the same day as President Trump’s inauguration ceremony.

A whistleblower has told my lawyers where my name and the fact that application had been made for a FISA warrant on me was redacted from the stunning Carter Page FISA warrant application released by the FBI last week with 300 of 400 pages blacked out.

A FISA warrant can only be issued against a U.S. Citizen who is engaged in espionage for a foreign power against the United States. I have never engaged in any such thing.

In other words, heavy-handed federal prosecutors have had full access to my e-mails, text messages and cell calls since 2016 and are monitoring my communications now, and they still have no evidence of Russian collusion or any Wikileaks collaboration.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/13/roger-...collusion/

BOOM. Im telling you---documents are coming. The will be completely declassified by the president, with no redactions, and available to the public in late October. Just you wait and see.

DJT is licking his chops just waiting to bust their balls going into Nov....

The left will claim Trump is weaponizing the intelligence agencies against the left to hide Russian collusion and affect the midterm elections. Some here will believe that narrative.

(08-14-2018 10:51 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The left will claim Trump is weaponizing the intelligence agencies against the left to hide Russian collusion and affect the midterm elections. Some here will believe that narrative.

He'll actually be weaponizing the truth to expose dim collusion and affect the midterm elections.

Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

So you agree that spreading some light on the subject is a good thing. Good, welcome aboard. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

Of course we do. Drain the Swamp.

And you support Team Corruption

(08-14-2018 12:50 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  And you support Team Corruption

Team corruption is the side that will fight tooth and nail to prevent the truth from being disclosed. Let's see how that plays out. Of course, one side is already on their knees blowing Strojk, so we kind of know, dont we?

MUH JESTER!

(08-14-2018 12:50 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  And you support Team Corruption

No. None of them supported Hillary & Bill Clinton.

I don't think any of them supported the Obama administration which used the FBI and CIA and IRS as weapons against its political opponents.

Which goes back to the Goebbels statement i posted earlier. Blame others for what you are actually doing.

How are Democrats fighting tooth and nail to keep things silenced? If that were true they would have disclosed Trump was team was under active investigation for Russian collusion pre voting instead of Hillary’s emails.

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

It already has. Guess you weren’t paying attention.

(08-14-2018 02:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Which goes back to the Goebbels statement i posted earlier. Blame others for what you are actually doing.

So you are claiming you follow Goebbels?

Nobody in their right mind can honestly say the Clintons weren't corrupt. Maybe not criminally so (that's arguable-but to clarify, personally I think they were crooks), but they abused ethics rules where ever they could in order to make money.

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

This coming from the man that believes in the fake dossier.

(08-14-2018 02:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Which goes back to the Goebbels statement i posted earlier. Blame others for what you are actually doing.

"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."

"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."

Sincerely,

S Alinksy.

(08-14-2018 03:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

This coming from the man that believes in the fake dossier.

Please cite ways in which the dossier is fake.

If you can't please disavow and quit using the moniker fake.

(08-14-2018 02:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Which goes back to the Goebbels statement i posted earlier. Blame others for what you are actually doing.

Indeed. That is exactly what your side is doing.

(08-15-2018 01:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(08-14-2018 03:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-14-2018 12:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Gawd......... this is unbelievable to me. You guys actually think declassifying will help you. The Jim Jones phenomena. Drink that Kool Aide boys. Drink it up.

This coming from the man that believes in the fake dossier.

Please cite ways in which the dossier is fake.
If you can't please disavow and quit using the moniker fake.

Has it been 100% verified? Everything I've seen, including Adam Schiff's statements, says no. Some of it has, some of it hasn't. That makes it, for FISA evidentiary purposes, the same as a fake.

Does "unverified dossier" sound better to you that "fake dossier"? That is unquestionably accurate based upon every single piece of information I have seen or heard. If you have proof to the contrary, please provide. And from the standpoint of the rules of evidence applicable in FISA court, they mean the same thing. Exactly the same thing.