(08-19-2018 05:28 PM)Paul M Wrote:  That would be cool... if it had ANYTHING to do with replying to me.

you never reply directly to any post and spew rhetoric....

how else do you expect people to respond.....

that's on ewe feller....

you hate everything......we get it....

ewe never offer a solution.....we get that too....

if you want to debate or fight, I'll give you either or both.....

however, when playing the disingenuous card, you don't deserve shite as a fool that won't be fooled again....

I replied directly to you. He was free to reply to that if he wanted. He choose not to. His 2 sentences don't pertain to me. Not sure why you think I should humor him with anything other than informing him of his mistake.

(08-19-2018 07:56 PM)Paul M Wrote:  I replied directly to you. He was free to reply to that if he wanted. He choose not to. His 2 sentences don't pertain to me. Not sure why you think I should humor him with anything other than informing him of his mistake.

no you didn't.....if my post isn't in your reply, I can only guess who you're replying to....

and who the hell is "him".....

ACLU comes out in defense of Jones.

How silly are resident alt-leftists looking right now? They have been thoroughly exposed as authoritarians.

Quote:ACLU: Alex Jones Social Media Bans Are ‘Worrisome’

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey says social media platforms shouldn’t be “arbiters of truth.” The ACLU seems to agrees with that sentiment.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/acl...b1febdc797

I will tell the ACLU to go FO. They made it hard to get people locked up for mental problems. Now, they want to get involved in a private business on this issue? The Social media companies do have the right to banned Alex Jones and others from both left and right for violating their terms of service.

(08-21-2018 03:39 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I will tell the ACLU to go FO. They made it hard to get people locked up for mental problems. Now, they want to get involved in a private business on this issue? The Social media companies do have the right to banned Alex Jones and others from both left and right for violating their terms of service.

Although I disagree whole-heartedly with everything you said, I think the point is best illustrated with this specific example. What TOS did Jones violate on Linkedin? Please be specific.

Note: He never uploaded any "content" to Linkedin, as it is merely a resume site.

Is it possible instead, that the "big boys" (FB, AAPL, GOOG) colluded with one another (how do you break all those different TOS's simultaneously, after having been on them for decades?), and then the followers followed?

The more this decision is looked at, the less it holds up to scrutiny. This was done to kick off the larger plan of de-platforming anyone that is both popular and doesn't 100% toe the SJW line (assuming they can get away with it, and who would come to the defense of some kook?), under the auspices of "hate speech" (knowing that can apply that to literally anything), because alt-leftists are tired of losing.

Authoritarian alt-leftists then say "Whatever, create your own platforms then."

People have, Gab is a popular twitter alternative. BitChute, an alternative for Youtube. BOTH have been attacked by the SJW mobs and threatened to be removed by their domain registrars and payment processors.

"Whatever, create your own domain registrars and payments processors."

....

"Whatever, create your own internet."

I didn't read the whole thread, but I can access Alex Jones's 'Infowars' channel on Youtube and can easily access Infowars on Google (I know it wasn't mentioned as being unavailable). I don't do twitter and facebook so couldn't check there.

So...was the ban known to be lifted and I missed it or was the ban extremely short lived???

Pulled this off of youtube just now.

(08-23-2018 11:00 AM)miko33 Wrote:  I didn't read the whole thread, but I can access Alex Jones's 'Infowars' channel on Youtube and can easily access Infowars on Google (I know it wasn't mentioned as being unavailable). I don't do twitter and facebook so couldn't check there.

So...was the ban known to be lifted and I missed it or was the ban extremely short lived???

Pulled this off of youtube just now.

People are uploading his shows, but whenever Youtube finds them, they take them down and ban the accounts.

None of it makes any sense. Jones was banned for allegedly skirting their TOS and streaming from a backup channel while his streaming privileges were revoked on his main account, but they are banning all of his content, even if it isn't him uploading it. They even banned parody cartoons that used his voice in the background.

Found a re-upload of one of them. This shite cracks me up.

Getting harder to tell the difference between religious fanatics and "progressive" these days.