https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1...4383740929

AND GOING

At this point there is no difference between the Democratic Party and one of Rand Paul’s neighbors. Be Gone!

Mueller has said he will wrap it up by September.

and Poly looking for a cracker.....why would that date be important.......

hmmmmmmmmmm

you're a DA if you didn't see that coming 1.5 yrs ago....

(07-14-2018 06:39 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  Mueller has said he will wrap it up by September.

I don't think he's said any such thing though you're free to prove me wrong with a linky.

(07-14-2018 06:39 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  Mueller has said he will wrap it up by September.

September 2020.

Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

Is collusion a crime?

(07-14-2018 06:39 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  Mueller has said he will wrap it up by September.

But that's when he'll find a "smoking gun" to justify continuing to the mid-terms.

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

LOL, even if the Russians hacked the DNC server, the FBI won't convict them of anything. You dolts on the left are hilarious. Maybe this will get Trump impeached!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

Here's the real problem with that.

If it happens, all that the right has to do is point to the content of the hacked emails.

You have a two-year investigation vetting who stole who's emails. The added effect of that is that you prove the emails are real and are from the people involved.

No matter how the emails came out, the content of the emails themselves is more damning. When the day comes the left tries to bring this to bear, they are going to have the whole thing shoved up their asses in pubic by the right because of what is in the emails.

Even if you had an impeached Trump on trial before the Senate, all he has to do is point at the content of those emails and say, "Did I not have a responsibility to see that was made public?"

The left can't win here.

Russia collusion = flat earth theory

A liberal has never been right here on this site before so I'm not worried.

(07-13-2018 03:48 PM)Dasville Wrote:  At this point there is no difference between the Democratic Party and one of Rand Paul’s neighbors. Be Gone!

There's no difference between the Democratic Party and Vladimir Putin. They are both trying to cause division in America and undermine faith in our Constitution and pushing totalitarian states where the government is used to silence your opponents and try to economically bankrupt them.

Bill and Hillary are the only ones who have been proven to be paid by the Russians.

(07-14-2018 09:32 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

Here's the real problem with that.

If it happens, all that the right has to do is point to the content of the hacked emails.

You have a two-year investigation vetting who stole who's emails. The added effect of that is that you prove the emails are real and are from the people involved.

No matter how the emails came out, the content of the emails themselves is more damning. When the day comes the left tries to bring this to bear, they are going to have the whole thing shoved up their asses in pubic by the right because of what is in the emails.

Even if you had an impeached Trump on trial before the Senate, all he has to do is point at the content of those emails and say, "Did I not have a responsibility to see that was made public?"

The left can't win here.

This.

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.
The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.
The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.
The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.
The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

Just wondering, do you have a theory of how "the Trump campaign were complicit"? I mean who did what that constituted conspiracy?

And I would remind you that indictments do not constitute proof of anything. So those indictments do not prove steps 1 or 2.

I'm still trying to find the crime here. Perhaps you have some idea where it is. Having a meeting at which Russian nationals were present is not a crime.

(07-14-2018 07:19 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(07-14-2018 06:39 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  Mueller has said he will wrap it up by September.

I don't think he's said any such thing though you're free to prove me wrong with a linky.

"https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/20/muellers-office-said-to-plan-wrapping-up-trump-probe-by-september.html"

(07-14-2018 08:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Quite the contrary. I think they know exactly where they’re going.

The first step is to prove to you dolts there was a crime committed... 1st round of indictments.

The second step is to prove the Russian government, and not some amateur group of hackers were involved... second round of indictments.

The third step will be to prove Americans were complicit.

The 4th step will be to prove the Trump campaign were complicit.

Alt-left fan fiction.

lulz