(07-13-2018 02:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 10:57 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It's just art. The 1st Amendment protects her entirely and her speech should be protected.

The outrage is justified though. **** her!

Mostly agree. While I will protect her right, I don't have to agree with it.

Seeing idiots with flags on the back of pickup trucks and in car windows on poles being torn to shreds and discolored and dirtied by the weather upset me even more than purposeful art. Same thing goes for people flying flags at home when they're all tattered and torn.

The artist was practically recruited by the Museum to create the flag so it could be displayed there. It was a national flag art deal. The Museum is part of the university. It isn't a rights issue or freedom of speech thing. The flag is inside the Museum now not outside.

I don't see how that changes anything.

(07-13-2018 02:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 10:57 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It's just art. The 1st Amendment protects her entirely and her speech should be protected.

The outrage is justified though. **** her!

Mostly agree. While I will protect her right, I don't have to agree with it.

Seeing idiots with flags on the back of pickup trucks and in car windows on poles being torn to shreds and discolored and dirtied by the weather upset me even more than purposeful art. Same thing goes for people flying flags at home when they're all tattered and torn.

The artist was practically recruited by the Museum to create the flag so it could be displayed there. It was a national flag art deal. The Museum is part of the university. It isn't a rights issue or freedom of speech thing. The flag is inside the Museum now not outside.

I don't see how that changes anything.

The flag is inside the museum because the Gov told the university he didn't want it displayed outside. Do you think artist has a constitutional right to display it outside the museum?

(07-13-2018 02:32 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 10:57 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  It's just art. The 1st Amendment protects her entirely and her speech should be protected.

The outrage is justified though. **** her!

Mostly agree. While I will protect her right, I don't have to agree with it.

Seeing idiots with flags on the back of pickup trucks and in car windows on poles being torn to shreds and discolored and dirtied by the weather upset me even more than purposeful art. Same thing goes for people flying flags at home when they're all tattered and torn.

The artist was practically recruited by the Museum to create the flag so it could be displayed there. It was a national flag art deal. The Museum is part of the university. It isn't a rights issue or freedom of speech thing. The flag is inside the Museum now not outside.

I don't see how that changes anything.

The flag is inside the museum because the Gov told the university he didn't want it displayed outside. Do you think artist has a constitutional right to display it outside the museum?

I don't see why not.

(07-11-2018 08:27 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

(07-11-2018 08:19 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Gone...This is Kansas, not California.

Well that explains why they had to go to Wisconsin to get a loan to remodel their football stadium!

(07-11-2018 09:35 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(07-11-2018 09:12 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  She's a Democrat?? Her Wikileaks page states shes German.

Ok, fine. Socialist Democrat then.

She's a true German with Nazi thoughts and no Lefty noticed. Did she wear her invisible paint?

(07-13-2018 03:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:32 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Mostly agree. While I will protect her right, I don't have to agree with it.

Seeing idiots with flags on the back of pickup trucks and in car windows on poles being torn to shreds and discolored and dirtied by the weather upset me even more than purposeful art. Same thing goes for people flying flags at home when they're all tattered and torn.

The artist was practically recruited by the Museum to create the flag so it could be displayed there. It was a national flag art deal. The Museum is part of the university. It isn't a rights issue or freedom of speech thing. The flag is inside the Museum now not outside.

I don't see how that changes anything.

The flag is inside the museum because the Gov told the university he didn't want it displayed outside. Do you think artist has a constitutional right to display it outside the museum?

I don't see why not.

So anyone can go to state owned property and display whatever they want?

(07-13-2018 05:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 03:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:32 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 02:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  The artist was practically recruited by the Museum to create the flag so it could be displayed there. It was a national flag art deal. The Museum is part of the university. It isn't a rights issue or freedom of speech thing. The flag is inside the Museum now not outside.

I don't see how that changes anything.

The flag is inside the museum because the Gov told the university he didn't want it displayed outside. Do you think artist has a constitutional right to display it outside the museum?

I don't see why not.

So anyone can go to state owned property and display whatever they want?

Not at all what I'm saying, nor what the artist did here.

(07-12-2018 03:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  “If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” ~ Justice William Brennan.

Ann Coulter and Milo, line 2.

(07-16-2018 09:24 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-12-2018 03:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  “If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” ~ Justice William Brennan.

Ann Coulter and Milo, line 2.

Bill Maher, line 3.