Cincinnati Bearcats

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Nippert Stadium
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
TubaCat Offline
1st Chair
*

Posts: 2,403
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 109
I Root For: Bearcats, tubas
Location: Murphy's
Post: #21
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.
 
07-16-2018 01:46 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigDawg Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,817
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 39
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #22
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.
 
07-17-2018 12:07 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JackieTreehorn Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,869
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 129
I Root For: The Bearcats
Location: The 'Nati
Post: #23
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.
 
07-17-2018 12:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Not Duane Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 930
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.
 
07-17-2018 01:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,478
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 766
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #25
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

I agree. There's few billionaires I'd say this about, but what's good for the Lindners is good for the people (of Cincinnati).
 
07-17-2018 01:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JackieTreehorn Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,869
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 129
I Root For: The Bearcats
Location: The 'Nati
Post: #26
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?
 
07-17-2018 03:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatsUC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,801
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 72
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 03:02 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?

The crime is that UC paid for this, not FCC.

When General Electric donates to UC they know they benefit from their relationship with the school. Lindner benefits from having a good business school in their backyard. I’m guessing Great American gets first dibs on the Lindner Honors program.
 
(This post was last modified: 07-17-2018 09:37 PM by BearcatsUC.)
07-17-2018 09:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JJ_Bearcats Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 29
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Cincy Bearcats
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 09:31 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 03:02 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?

The crime is that UC paid for this, not FCC.

When General Electric donates to UC they know they benefit from their relationship with the school. Lindner benefits from having a good business school in their backyard. I’m guessing Great American gets first dibs on the Lindner Honors program.

My understanding is that FCC paid for it, but then held on to 100% of the concessions money until they gained that back at which point UC and FCC began splitting concession money.

Of course, the argument then is that they lost out on that initial concession money, therefore UC paid for it. Then the counterargument to that would be that the concession money wouldn't have existed in the first place had FCC not played at Nippert.

I see your point, but wouldn't exactly describe it as a "crime".

Regardless, I like the idea that Tuba had, replace the notches up to the point where the lowest row is now. Brings back the full horseshoe shape while still keeping everything a bit wider and safer. Win win.
 
07-17-2018 10:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,737
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 800
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Nippert Stadium
Uc didn't pay for it
 
07-18-2018 06:42 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatMan Offline
Kicking Connoisseur/Occasional Man Crush
*

Posts: 24,161
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 585
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 09:31 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 03:02 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?

The crime is that UC paid for this, not FCC.

When General Electric donates to UC they know they benefit from their relationship with the school. Lindner benefits from having a good business school in their backyard. I’m guessing Great American gets first dibs on the Lindner Honors program.

If the LHP kids are working for Great American, they're doing something horribly, horribly wrong. Many of the people I knew in that program in the mid-00's are well above that level of corporate/geographic/economic standing.
 
07-18-2018 07:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Not Duane Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 930
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 03:02 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?

Do you personally want to take that risk? Especially with the AD well in the red?

My point was that you were short-sighted...not that the Lindner's explicitly stated they would yank their donations.

It's smart business and smart politics to keep major donors happy. They pay, we accommodate.

You tick them off, you are less likely to benefit from their largess in the future.

That's just common sense.

Which you seem to lack.
 
07-18-2018 09:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mlb Offline
O' Great One
*

Posts: 20,276
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 540
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #32
Nippert Stadium
It really doesn't matter. They are in Nippert for the next 2.5 years and UC splits concessions 50/50 while getting all parking. It's a win for UC hands down.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
(This post was last modified: 07-19-2018 10:24 AM by mlb.)
07-18-2018 09:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatfan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,516
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 192
I Root For: The Bearcats!
Location:
Post: #33
RE: Nippert Stadium
I'm interested in what the next changes to Nippert will be. For instance, will MLS require a grass field?


"Berding said some of the issues the club is looking at -- based on recommendations or requirements from MLS -- include new turf"

...

According to the university, in response to a public records request, there are currently no bids or RFPs for changes to the stadium or playing field and no contracts have been changed or updated in the last seven months since FCC made its pitch to the MLS expansion board back in December.

...

Any major changes, such as the locker room renovations (including installing showers) and new turf, would need to be done after the UC football season; however, it's a short window until the MLS season begins in March.

https://www.wcpo.com/news/insider/fc-cin...m-is-ready
 
(This post was last modified: 07-18-2018 09:34 AM by bearcatfan.)
07-18-2018 09:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mlb Offline
O' Great One
*

Posts: 20,276
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 540
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #34
Nippert Stadium
Doubt it is real grass. The other teams who play in NFL stadiums are on field turf.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
07-18-2018 09:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmill Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,338
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation: 63
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

Athletic Dept brought up the safety issue in the past, well before FCC. Just never acted upon it.
 
07-18-2018 11:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatMan Offline
Kicking Connoisseur/Occasional Man Crush
*

Posts: 24,161
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 585
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-18-2018 11:16 AM)bearcatmill Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:07 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:46 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-16-2018 01:14 PM)doss2 Wrote:  Will the notches be removed? It depends on which Bohn statement was honest (if any). He said once that they were temporary. Then he said they were for safety.

The later may have painted him into a corner (or a notch).


Imagine the notches are removed and a player runs into a wall where a notch had been. The players attorney would hammer UC and it's insurer with the "Notches were for safety and you removed them!"

I always thought that removing the first few rows of seats was the only aspect that improved safety, and the notches were implemented not as a safety measure but to allow a regulation soccer field. I hope we can fill in the notches while leaving the rest of the wall intact... I believe that would satisfy most people.

It was a safety measure as well as helping with soccer since the corner of the end zone didn't really offer much room for players to stop after they left the end zone. We did get the Mardy play, but I will admit I'm surprised there weren't a few injuries crashing into the wall.

The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

Athletic Dept brought up the safety issue in the past, well before FCC. Just never acted upon it.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that was a point of comment for the Athletic Department when Mardy Gilyard's helmet did some orthodontic work to a pre-teen in Row 4 in 2008.
 
07-18-2018 12:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatsUC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,801
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 72
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #37
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-18-2018 06:42 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Uc didn't pay for it

According to the contract, FCC fronted the moneyandUC paid it back thru concessions.
 
07-19-2018 10:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatsUC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,801
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 72
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-18-2018 07:56 AM)BearcatMan Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 09:31 PM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 03:02 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 01:17 PM)Not Duane Wrote:  
(07-17-2018 12:50 PM)JackieTreehorn Wrote:  The safety thing was just excuse so the administration didn't look like complete lickspittle for the Lindner family.

You'd rather have the Lindners P.O.'d so UC could kiss goodbye to their donations?

https://foundation.uc.edu/05-news--event...es/lindner

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/20...960585001/

https://business.uc.edu/undergraduate/li...s/LHP.html

My...aren't you short-sighted!

I guess for you pride and poverty go hand-in-hand in your vision for UC.

So where in any of your little links is there a statement saying UC would "kiss goodbye to their donations" if the seats weren't torn out?

The crime is that UC paid for this, not FCC.

When General Electric donates to UC they know they benefit from their relationship with the school. Lindner benefits from having a good business school in their backyard. I’m guessing Great American gets first dibs on the Lindner Honors program.

If the LHP kids are working for Great American, they're doing something horribly, horribly wrong. Many of the people I knew in that program in the mid-00's are well above that level of corporate/geographic/economic standing.

Great American is a Fortune 500 company. They must be doing something right. They probably have positions for the highly qualified...though your point is duly noted.
 
07-19-2018 10:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JJ_Bearcats Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 29
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Cincy Bearcats
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-19-2018 10:22 AM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  
(07-18-2018 06:42 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Uc didn't pay for it

According to the contract, FCC fronted the moneyandUC paid it back thru concessions.

My understanding is that FCC paid for it, but then held on to 100% of the concessions money until they gained that back at which point UC and FCC began splitting concession money.

Of course, the argument then is that they "lost" out on that initial concession money, therefore you frame it as UC paid for it. Then the counterargument to that would be that the concession money wouldn't have existed in the first place had FCC not played at Nippert.
 
(This post was last modified: 07-19-2018 10:54 AM by JJ_Bearcats.)
07-19-2018 10:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Not Duane Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 930
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 7
I Root For: UC
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Nippert Stadium
(07-19-2018 10:53 AM)JJ_Bearcats Wrote:  
(07-19-2018 10:22 AM)BearcatsUC Wrote:  
(07-18-2018 06:42 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Uc didn't pay for it

According to the contract, FCC fronted the moneyandUC paid it back thru concessions.

My understanding is that FCC paid for it, but then held on to 100% of the concessions money until they gained that back at which point UC and FCC began splitting concession money.

Of course, the argument then is that they "lost" out on that initial concession money, therefore you frame it as UC paid for it. Then the counterargument to that would be that the concession money wouldn't have existed in the first place had FCC not played at Nippert.

Don't you understand that its all about those damn notches!! ? ?
 
(This post was last modified: 07-19-2018 08:39 PM by Not Duane.)
07-19-2018 08:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.