(06-19-2018 03:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:52 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  i mean why not just wear it and grow up. it doesn't mean you agree with it. Its uniform that is your job right? You can literally say i don't agree with this publicly and it does the same thing.... I mean there doesn't need to be a freak out by the LGBTQ community, but also the player IMO needs to be an adult and just wear the damn jersey. I dont like the uniform that I have to wear for work...There are uniforms that violate peoples religious beliefs but they are adults and deal with it...

She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

So the church should change their doctrine to accommodate gay weddings? Don't get me wrong, plenty have, but not all of them will and it can't be expected any more than this soccer player should not have expected the team let her play without the rainbow jersey. All indications say she did not expect that.

That's a decision that has always been left up to the individual church. My church recently voted no, and that's not a problem for me. I'm still welcome in my church anytime, and I understand the philosophy behind the congregation's decision.

But it's different when you're a paid professional. If NFL players are expected to stand at attention for the national anthem despite their beliefs, why shouldn't she be expected to wear the jersey that her team is wearing for a specific game?

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:52 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  i mean why not just wear it and grow up. it doesn't mean you agree with it. Its uniform that is your job right? You can literally say i don't agree with this publicly and it does the same thing.... I mean there doesn't need to be a freak out by the LGBTQ community, but also the player IMO needs to be an adult and just wear the damn jersey. I dont like the uniform that I have to wear for work...There are uniforms that violate peoples religious beliefs but they are adults and deal with it...

She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

How would we know the player is gay?

(06-19-2018 03:33 PM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:52 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  i mean why not just wear it and grow up. it doesn't mean you agree with it. Its uniform that is your job right? You can literally say i don't agree with this publicly and it does the same thing.... I mean there doesn't need to be a freak out by the LGBTQ community, but also the player IMO needs to be an adult and just wear the damn jersey. I dont like the uniform that I have to wear for work...There are uniforms that violate peoples religious beliefs but they are adults and deal with it...

She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

So the church should change their doctrine to accommodate gay weddings? Don't get me wrong, plenty have, but not all of them will and it can't be expected any more than this soccer player should not have expected the team let her play without the rainbow jersey. All indications say she did not expect that.

That's a decision that has always been left up to the individual church. My church recently voted no, and that's not a problem for me. I'm still welcome in my church anytime, and I understand the philosophy behind the congregation's decision.

But it's different when you're a paid professional. If NFL players are expected to stand at attention for the national anthem despite their beliefs, why shouldn't she be expected to wear the jersey that her team is wearing for a specific game?

If she was a paid professional, then I agree, she should be expected to wear the jersey. The difference here is that she chose not to be a paid professional. Further, she never asked for special treatment. I don't see the problem as she doesn't owe anybody anything. She is just one person with an opinion. You are never going to get 100% acceptance (nor is anyone else). Time to move on.

(06-19-2018 03:26 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:52 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  i mean why not just wear it and grow up. it doesn't mean you agree with it. Its uniform that is your job right? You can literally say i don't agree with this publicly and it does the same thing.... I mean there doesn't need to be a freak out by the LGBTQ community, but also the player IMO needs to be an adult and just wear the damn jersey. I dont like the uniform that I have to wear for work...There are uniforms that violate peoples religious beliefs but they are adults and deal with it...

She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

So the church should change their doctrine to accommodate gay weddings? Don't get me wrong, plenty have, but not all of them will and it can't be expected any more than this soccer player should not have expected the team let her play without the rainbow jersey. All indications say she did not expect that.

i never said the church should change anything ( i personally think they should..but that's not important right now)...But also dont expect a friendly response from the gay community when they are literally shunned by certain religious groups that use that symbol because of their sexuality.

But the gay "community" (whatever that is) demands a friendly response from people that fundamentally disagree with their lifestyle and behaviors.

Got it.

(06-19-2018 03:33 PM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:52 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  i mean why not just wear it and grow up. it doesn't mean you agree with it. Its uniform that is your job right? You can literally say i don't agree with this publicly and it does the same thing.... I mean there doesn't need to be a freak out by the LGBTQ community, but also the player IMO needs to be an adult and just wear the damn jersey. I dont like the uniform that I have to wear for work...There are uniforms that violate peoples religious beliefs but they are adults and deal with it...

She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

So the church should change their doctrine to accommodate gay weddings? Don't get me wrong, plenty have, but not all of them will and it can't be expected any more than this soccer player should not have expected the team let her play without the rainbow jersey. All indications say she did not expect that.

That's a decision that has always been left up to the individual church. My church recently voted no, and that's not a problem for me. I'm still welcome in my church anytime, and I understand the philosophy behind the congregation's decision.

But it's different when you're a paid professional. If NFL players are expected to stand at attention for the national anthem despite their beliefs, why shouldn't she be expected to wear the jersey that her team is wearing for a specific game?

She gave her reasons, SHE made the sacrifice(s). Now, the alt-gay (snicker) wants to somehow play victim and lash out and harass someone who has done nothing wrong.

Why in the world does a sports franchise need to be making a political statement of any kind?

(06-19-2018 04:07 PM)Oman Wrote:  Why in the world does a sports franchise need to be making a political statement of any kind?

Refer to my example on the Atlanta Braves. There's money behind everything.

(06-19-2018 03:49 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:33 PM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:15 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 03:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  She did deal with it. If she didn't want to wear the jersey that badly, she did the right thing by not joining the team. I commend her for it. If the shoe was on the other foot and there was a cross on the jersey, the LGBTQIATHNEXG player would have joined the team and then sued or made some kind of public spectacle.

i know plenty of gay people that are religious...it the religious side that pushes them a way not the other way around. Tons of gay people want to get married in churches but the church tells they are the work of the devil...then the some LTGBQ people have a certain taste in their mouth because of what they were just told by the religion they grew up with..That is why there would be some uproar. But i pretty sure a ton of Gay people would wear that cross jersey with pride. Honestly there would probably be more push back from the religious community because a gay person
is wearing a jersey with a cross on it... not the other way around.

So the church should change their doctrine to accommodate gay weddings? Don't get me wrong, plenty have, but not all of them will and it can't be expected any more than this soccer player should not have expected the team let her play without the rainbow jersey. All indications say she did not expect that.

That's a decision that has always been left up to the individual church. My church recently voted no, and that's not a problem for me. I'm still welcome in my church anytime, and I understand the philosophy behind the congregation's decision.

But it's different when you're a paid professional. If NFL players are expected to stand at attention for the national anthem despite their beliefs, why shouldn't she be expected to wear the jersey that her team is wearing for a specific game?

She gave her reasons, SHE made the sacrifice(s). Now, the alt-gay (snicker) wants to somehow play victim and lash out and harass someone who has done nothing wrong.

Oh give me an effing break. You make it sound like she was attacked by an angry mob for being Christian. When did the right become so fragile that booing a player at a soccer game became "lashing out and harrassment." She's not some kind of martyr

(06-19-2018 04:07 PM)Oman Wrote:  Why in the world does a sports franchise need to be making a political statement of any kind?

It's not, its the US National Teams and they always do it during June.

If she wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.

(06-19-2018 04:18 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  If she wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.

If muslim wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.



required pork jerseys

i dont like required

i dont like harassed

(06-19-2018 04:25 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 04:18 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  If she wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.

If muslim wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.



required pork jerseys

i dont like required

i dont like harassed

Pigs vs. humans. Apples & anvils.
Once you see a team requiring that players wear jerseys to honor cooking pigs, lemme know. I'll buy them some bbq rub.

(06-19-2018 04:31 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 04:25 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 04:18 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  If she wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.

If muslim wants to shoot her career that she's been working for her entire life in the foot because she doesn't want to wear one particular jersey for one particular month out of the year, that's on her....it's completely short-sighted and ridiculous, but her call.


required pork jerseys

i dont like required

i dont like harassed

Pigs vs. humans. Apples & anvils.
Once you see a team requiring that players wear jerseys to honor cooking pigs, lemme know. I'll buy them some bbq rub.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-...hiva-amini

i simplified the analogy.

required, harrassed.

differing degrees

I'm with Hinkle and I couldn't care less if the gay "community" doesn't like it. I'll never celebrate this issue. If YOU want to that's on you.

it should be optional and neither side should be harassed. what happened to common sense. you know, diversity and tolerance.

[quote='TrueBlueDrew' pid='15350561' dateline='1529438621'
Also when did Gay become the opposite of Christian?
[/quote]

Probably when the degenerates started doing **** like this

There is no denying that the hard left and the LGBTers are using the gay stuff as a wedge to attack Christians and paint them as bigots if they don't celebrate and support homosexuality.

People on the left can lie about it till the cows come home, but it is happening and will continue to happen.

(06-19-2018 02:48 PM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 01:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  LGBT activists are so tolerant that they are now harassing and spreading hate towards a player that chose not to get called up to the US Women's National team, because she didn't want to be forced to wear these "pride" jerseys.

I'm not condoning attacking people for their personal choices but Lord, it's a shirt with a rainbow on it. It seems like a silly thing to get so worked up over that you throw away a chance to play on a major team. That decision is on her, but she shouldn't get hate for it.

Quite frankly its not your place to tell Christians how they should feel about wearing a gay pride jersey, or stand in judgment of their religious convictions concerning celebrating gay pride.

You can't pat yourself on your back as if you are more evolved and inclusive while simultaneously acting dismissive of other peoples religious convictions.

That is not being evolved or inclusive, its being a hypocrite.

(06-19-2018 07:09 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  There is no denying that the hard left and the LGBTers are using the gay stuff as a wedge to attack Christians and paint them as bigots if they don't celebrate and support homosexuality.

People on the left can lie about it till the cows come home, but it is happening and will continue to happen.

Attack Christians?? Wanting equal rights is not an attack on Christians. You’re beyond delusional. Up until 2003, yes 2003, I could have been put in jail just for existing in some states. Christians have NEVER been persecuted in this country and this country is still Christian by a large majority. Please sit down and stop your fake martyrdom. My rights don’t concern you and you aren’t being forced to do anything.

(06-19-2018 09:15 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 02:48 PM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  

(06-19-2018 01:36 PM)Kronke Wrote:  LGBT activists are so tolerant that they are now harassing and spreading hate towards a player that chose not to get called up to the US Women's National team, because she didn't want to be forced to wear these "pride" jerseys.

I'm not condoning attacking people for their personal choices but Lord, it's a shirt with a rainbow on it. It seems like a silly thing to get so worked up over that you throw away a chance to play on a major team. That decision is on her, but she shouldn't get hate for it.

Quite frankly its not your place to tell Christians how they should feel about wearing a gay pride jersey, or stand in judgment of their religious convictions concerning celebrating gay pride.

You can't pat yourself on your back as if you are more evolved and inclusive while simultaneously acting dismissive of other peoples religious convictions.

That is not being evolved or inclusive, its being a hypocrite.

Quite frankly it’s not your place to dictate what rights LGBT people are allowed to have based on your personal beliefs. No one is forcing you to wear, do, or say anything, but keep your “religious convictions” to yourself and I’ll keep my life to myself. And no, calling me intolerant because I don’t tolerate your hatred of me and my community is not how it works.