GoodOwl
The 1 Hoo Knocks
Posts: 25,371
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 2333
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
|
OT: Pac-12 passes rule requiring 6 wins for bowl eligibility
link: http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ligibility
Quote:The Pac-12 will require its football teams to win at least six regular-season games to play in a bowl game, eliminating the opportunity for a 5-7 squad to earn a postseason spot when there are not enough six-win teams nationally to fill the bowls.
Seems like way too many bowl games anyway. But this might eventually hurt the only P5 match-ups CUSA has if others follow suit. Another small item to separate the P5 and G5? On the other hand, perhaps it would open up a few more spots for G5s unless the number of bowls was reduced (which may well also be a goal here with this move.)
I at least appreciate they don't want losing teams representing them in bowls, which never made much sense to me.
ETA: It just occurred to me, by specifying a certain number of wins (6) perhaps leaves the door open for adding additional games to the schedule in the future?
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018 03:49 PM by GoodOwl.)
|
|
06-05-2018 03:47 PM |
|
OldOwl
1st String
Posts: 2,315
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: -12
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
|
RE: OT: Pac-12 passes rule requiring 6 wins for bowl eligibility
Conf USA should require a minimum if 7 wins since the conference is so weak. (06-05-2018 03:47 PM)GoodOwl Wrote: link: http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ligibility
Quote:The Pac-12 will require its football teams to win at least six regular-season games to play in a bowl game, eliminating the opportunity for a 5-7 squad to earn a postseason spot when there are not enough six-win teams nationally to fill the bowls.
Seems like way too many bowl games anyway. But this might eventually hurt the only P5 match-ups CUSA has if others follow suit. Another small item to separate the P5 and G5? On the other hand, perhaps it would open up a few more spots for G5s unless the number of bowls was reduced (which may well also be a goal here with this move.)
I at least appreciate they don't want losing teams representing them in bowls, which never made much sense to me.
ETA: It just occurred to me, by specifying a certain number of wins (6) perhaps leaves the door open for adding additional games to the schedule in the future?
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018 05:08 PM by OldOwl.)
|
|
06-05-2018 05:06 PM |
|
HawaiiOwl
Special Teams
Posts: 961
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 14
I Root For: Owls
Location:
|
RE: OT: Pac-12 passes rule requiring 6 wins for bowl eligibility
(06-05-2018 03:47 PM)GoodOwl Wrote: link: http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ligibility
Quote:The Pac-12 will require its football teams to win at least six regular-season games to play in a bowl game, eliminating the opportunity for a 5-7 squad to earn a postseason spot when there are not enough six-win teams nationally to fill the bowls.
Seems like way too many bowl games anyway. But this might eventually hurt the only P5 match-ups CUSA has if others follow suit. Another small item to separate the P5 and G5? On the other hand, perhaps it would open up a few more spots for G5s unless the number of bowls was reduced (which may well also be a goal here with this move.)
I at least appreciate they don't want losing teams representing them in bowls, which never made much sense to me.
ETA: It just occurred to me, by specifying a certain number of wins (6) perhaps leaves the door open for adding additional games to the schedule in the future?
Not sure what an 8-4 ( for instance) G5 beating a 5-7 p5 would prove?
|
|
06-07-2018 01:40 PM |
|