Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Bring it on coffee man.

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

I don’t know what Schultz’s political intentions are, but the Dems could do a lot worse than him, and probably will.

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

With the decisions being made at the top and the consequences of those decision in the last few weeks, his departure may be earned. It’s been one big cluster at the coffee house lately.

He's the perfect candidate. Another echo chamber lib.

Expanding his forced re-education process from his workforce to the general public is something upon which he should run. Nothing says electable like someone cramming NAACP-sponsored white-privilege bull**** down everyone's throats.

(06-04-2018 05:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

When it comes to elections, hypocrisy turns into "the lesser of two evils" real quick.

He would actually be a good candidate to challenge Trump (even though I don't see Trump really running again, I can't see him wanting to die as the most hated man on Earth), if they're just looking for a win. If he runs in this next election it's going to be more about getting people who sat out last time to vote than converting Trump voters (though they should still want to give that a try).

Schultz ran a company that can't really be cited for crookedness. I'm pretty sure they've been sued one time or another, but not for running sham universities or not paying people.

But, to be honest, I don't see Schultz running anyway.

If this guy runs in 2020 - and beats Trump - then this country will get EVERYTHING it deserves. EVERYTHING.

He'll just misspell everyone's name like his employees

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

(06-04-2018 09:40 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 05:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

When it comes to elections, hypocrisy turns into "the lesser of two evils" real quick.

He would actually be a good candidate to challenge Trump (even though I don't see Trump really running again, I can't see him wanting to die as the most hated man on Earth), if they're just looking for a win. If he runs in this next election it's going to be more about getting people who sat out last time to vote than converting Trump voters (though they should still want to give that a try).

Schultz ran a company that can't really be cited for crookedness. I'm pretty sure they've been sued one time or another, but not for running sham universities or not paying people.

But, to be honest, I don't see Schultz running anyway.

Hyperbolic much? You really should step outside of your echo chamber some time, you may gain a different insight.

(06-04-2018 09:50 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  If this guy runs in 2020 - and beats Trump - then this country will get EVERYTHING it deserves. EVERYTHING.

We already have a WWE HOFer in office. Would it really be worse if we ended up with PT Barnum?

LOL

Please let this SJW idiot run. The campaign ads write themselves. You'll be overwhelmed with ads showing drug addicts shooting up in Starbucks with the caption "He did this to your favorite coffee house. Do you want him to do the same to your country?"

(06-04-2018 10:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 09:40 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 05:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

When it comes to elections, hypocrisy turns into "the lesser of two evils" real quick.

He would actually be a good candidate to challenge Trump (even though I don't see Trump really running again, I can't see him wanting to die as the most hated man on Earth), if they're just looking for a win. If he runs in this next election it's going to be more about getting people who sat out last time to vote than converting Trump voters (though they should still want to give that a try).

Schultz ran a company that can't really be cited for crookedness. I'm pretty sure they've been sued one time or another, but not for running sham universities or not paying people.

But, to be honest, I don't see Schultz running anyway.

Hyperbolic much?

Yes. It actually was! But the hyperbole is based on observance. Outside of his core he's prepping to be in some pretty interesting company.

I think he considers himself a likable guy and probably can't understand why people find him...abrasive.

Only way Trump doesn’t run again is if he’s convinced he only has X months to live, or something like that.

But even that might not sway him. FDR was in that position in 1944 and ran for re-election, anyway.

As for being “the most hated man on earth”, I gotta say he doesn’t seem overly concerned.

(06-04-2018 05:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

Yet they would nominate Oprah in a heart beat? Is it first black woman president? If so, they are totally ate up with identity politics. Just nominate the best person regardless of sex or color.

(06-04-2018 07:48 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  Expanding his forced re-education process from his workforce to the general public is something upon which he should run. Nothing says electable like someone cramming NAACP-sponsored white-privilege bull**** down everyone's throats.

You mean he'll be the white Oblunder? I say the Demons shouldn't have a white privileged male in the WH.

*snicker, snicker* like he even had a chance.

(06-04-2018 10:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 09:40 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 05:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(06-04-2018 04:01 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Perhaps to challenge Trump in 2020?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ffee-giant

Nope. He has no chance in hades. Why? Because the left is adamant -- I mean darn near violent about it -- that a businessman has no place being elected POTUS.

And seeing how they're not prone to hypocrisy, well, I mean, c'mon.

When it comes to elections, hypocrisy turns into "the lesser of two evils" real quick.

He would actually be a good candidate to challenge Trump (even though I don't see Trump really running again, I can't see him wanting to die as the most hated man on Earth), if they're just looking for a win. If he runs in this next election it's going to be more about getting people who sat out last time to vote than converting Trump voters (though they should still want to give that a try).

Schultz ran a company that can't really be cited for crookedness. I'm pretty sure they've been sued one time or another, but not for running sham universities or not paying people.

But, to be honest, I don't see Schultz running anyway.

Hyperbolic much? You really should step outside of your echo chamber some time, you may gain a different insight.

You forget that liberals think the world is them. That's why they get so mad at everyone who doesn't agree with them and the ones that do are worthy of their world.