PLUG LEAKY DIKE BEFORE DAM BREAKS

I just got cancer listening to him...

Rachel has the IQ of a brick.

Didn't Donald Trump deny Obama's legitimacy the entire time? Didn't several others do the same thing for years? Is questioning the president's legitimacy bad now? Why?

Team sports I guess.

(05-24-2018 11:46 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Rachel has the IQ of a brick.

Because she is literate and smarmy she qualifies as a genius to democrats. Lol

lol he's still with her

(05-24-2018 11:46 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Is questioning the president's legitimacy bad now? Why?

AND HOW

That's a weird looking fella in the OP's video

(05-24-2018 12:04 PM)green Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 11:46 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Is questioning the president's legitimacy bad now? Why?

AND HOW

That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Just because Russia probably played both sides doesn’t mean that presidential legitimacy questions haven’t been stupid all around. My question is why isn’t it cool now?

(05-24-2018 12:10 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Just because Russia probably played both sides doesn’t mean that presidential legitimacy questions haven’t been stupid all around. My question is why isn’t it cool now?

HOT ON THE TRAIL

(05-24-2018 11:46 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Didn't Donald Trump deny Obama's legitimacy the entire time? Didn't several others do the same thing for years? Is questioning the president's legitimacy bad now? Why?

Team sports I guess.

Of course he did... whenever the opportunity presented itself DJT tried to delegitimize President Obama, and so did the alt-right media... ie Breitbart, WND and a host of others.

(05-24-2018 12:26 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  DJT tried to delegitimize President Obama, and so did the alt-right media... ie Breitbart, WND and a host of others.

Do you agree that Maddow operates on the same level as Breitbart and WND?

(05-24-2018 12:10 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Just because Russia probably played both sides doesn’t mean that presidential legitimacy questions haven’t been stupid all around. My question is why isn’t it cool now?

NEWS TO YOU

(05-24-2018 12:10 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Just because Russia probably played both sides doesn’t mean that presidential legitimacy questions haven’t been stupid all around. My question is why isn’t it cool now?

HAMBURGER HELPER

(05-24-2018 12:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 12:26 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  DJT tried to delegitimize President Obama, and so did the alt-right media... ie Breitbart, WND and a host of others.

Do you agree that Maddow operates on the same level as Breitbart and WND?

got eem

(05-24-2018 11:30 AM)green Wrote:  

PLUG LEAKY DIKE BEFORE DAM BREAKS

Funny thing about what she's saying... She had no proof and therefore she's still triggered. Sorry Trump won. The EC even took votes from HRC.

(05-24-2018 12:38 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 11:30 AM)green Wrote:  

PLUG LEAKY DIKE BEFORE DAM BREAKS

Funny thing about what she's saying... She had no proof and therefore she's still triggered. Sorry Trump won. The EC even took votes from HRC.

She's still has egg all over her face from the "Trump Tax Return" reveal. This isn't helping. No matter though as according to the ratings, not many folks even saw this anyway.

(05-24-2018 12:38 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Funny thing about what she's saying... She had no proof and therefore she's still triggered. Sorry Trump won. The EC even took votes from HRC.

CLAP ON CLAP OFF THE CLAPPER

(05-24-2018 11:46 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Rachel has the IQ of a brick.

Not true. My house is made of bricks and it's smarter.

I have never seen a worse temper tantrum from a bunch of losers in my life. The total inability to accept the results of an election is a serious threat to our republic. I think I heard that somewhere before.