(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

(05-19-2018 02:30 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

Yeah, but in the interest of accurate reporting, he should have once he found out it was erroneous. But it doesn't matter. Nothing is going to come of this. Nor should it.

(05-19-2018 02:30 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

I'm not missing any point. The bottom line is the guy had accurate info before the story was published. The fact that it was updated before publication says his first story is thus no longer accurate. He ignored it. Whatever happened before that point doesn't matter at all

And again people made this thread to instigate and hoping for some bombshell. It ended up being a dud

FAU's AD said....who...who?

(05-19-2018 02:41 PM)Ragu Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 02:30 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

I'm not missing any point. The bottom line is the guy had accurate info before the story was published. The fact that it was updated before publication says his first story is thus no longer accurate. He ignored it. Whatever happened before that point doesn't matter at all

And again people made this thread to instigate and hoping for some bombshell. It ended up being a dud

As this chain progressed I was thinking Dawgxas was just being a jerk (and maybe he was,) but if I were an FAU supporter I would be more concerned about how the initial report was compiled, composed, and submitted than by a newspaper account of the report. The magnitude of the errors do not appear to be 'clerical' and I would want to know why

There's nothing there so I'm not concerned at all

We have one intelligent FAU fan I have found on here, and he answered my question...Thanks again.

(05-19-2018 09:34 PM)nastybunch Wrote:  We have one intelligent FAU fan I have found on here, and he answered my question...Thanks again.

I didn't realize you struggled with reading comprehension. Or critical thinking skills. Everything he said was based in the article. Proud of you for having the courage to ask someone to explain it to you, though.

The story is gaining traction as I knew it would once FAU issue the press release attacking the reporter

ESPN:
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/story...-education

Fox Sports:
https://sso.foxsports.com/static/server....ion-051818

“It doesn’t appear that FAU would have noticed the mistake without The Post pointing it out.”

“FAU, however, has not filed the updated report.”

(05-19-2018 02:54 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 02:41 PM)Ragu Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 02:30 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

I'm not missing any point. The bottom line is the guy had accurate info before the story was published. The fact that it was updated before publication says his first story is thus no longer accurate. He ignored it. Whatever happened before that point doesn't matter at all

And again people made this thread to instigate and hoping for some bombshell. It ended up being a dud

As this chain progressed I was thinking Dawgxas was just being a jerk (and maybe he was,) but if I were an FAU supporter I would be more concerned about how the initial report was compiled, composed, and submitted than by a newspaper account of the report. The magnitude of the errors do not appear to be 'clerical' and I would want to know why

Not trying to be a jerk, but the way the school attacked the reporter was very poor form.

You are right, what is concerning is the false report not a reporter doing his job.
How does admin overestimate 45 female athletes and the associated percentages? Those type of errors do not seem clerical.

I'm concerned for Dawgxass if he thinks this is what it looks like when someone attacks a reporter. I hope he never turns on the news to see what our president is up to.

The whole story is about a reporter choosing to run an erroneous report despite a corrected report available prior to the time of publication. That is the short and the long of it.

(05-20-2018 12:20 AM)thefaU Wrote:  I'm concerned for Dawgxass if he thinks this is what it looks like when someone attacks a reporter. I hope he never turns on the news to see what our president is up to.

Likewise I hope he doesn't turn on the mainstream media news to see the slanted attacks they put forth towards our president constantly.

(05-19-2018 02:30 PM)Lumberjack75 Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 11:21 AM)Ragu Wrote:  You either are trolling or really dumb at this point dawg

Fau gave the guy the corrected report. He chose to run the inaccurate story anyways. That's on him. Any reasonable and intelligent person would get this by now. Who cares if the initial report was a fau mistake or not? The bottom line is the reporter had the accurate info BEFORE publication and they chose to ignore it

That's not going to change no matter how many times you repeat yourself

I have no dog in this fight but think it is you who are missing the point - the initial report was issued by FAU and reported by the paper. The writer did not run an inaccurate story. He just did not give FAU a do-over.

Thats a good assessment. Four different perspectives from four different schools that I am in agreement with, including FAU connoisseur. Hopefully FAU can learn from this mistake.

If you have updated info before running the story, your story is indeed inaccurate. That's common sense. Mistakes are made for initial stories a lot. If you have new and real info and you ignore it, then that's irresponsible and false reporting

You guys went from proclaiming big title ix violations to talking about if initial info provided was wrong though. So that's indeed hilarious

Hopefully La Tech can stay within 4 scores in this years game

(05-20-2018 10:08 AM)Ragu Wrote:  If you have updated info before running the story, your story is indeed inaccurate. That's common sense. Mistakes are made for initial stories a lot. If you have new and real info and you ignore it, then that's irresponsible and false reporting

You guys went from proclaiming big title ix violations to talking about if initial info provided was wrong though. So that's indeed hilarious

Hopefully La Tech can stay within 4 scores in this years game

Quick question: my professor tells me I got half the questions wrong, if I give him the correct answers before he post the grades should I get a score of 100%?

(05-20-2018 11:44 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(05-20-2018 10:08 AM)Ragu Wrote:  If you have updated info before running the story, your story is indeed inaccurate. That's common sense. Mistakes are made for initial stories a lot. If you have new and real info and you ignore it, then that's irresponsible and false reporting

You guys went from proclaiming big title ix violations to talking about if initial info provided was wrong though. So that's indeed hilarious

Hopefully La Tech can stay within 4 scores in this years game

Quick question: my professor tells me I got half the questions wrong, if I give him the correct answers before he post the grades should I get a score of 100%?

That's apples and oranges

A test is done once you take it. There are no updates. It's cut and dry if you got it right or wrong

With stories in publication , if the facts or figures provided initially are wrong it can be updated. And this guy had the info before publication

Similarly if a story is false or update after publication you can print a retraction

But nice try

(05-20-2018 11:44 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  Quick question: my professor tells me I got half the questions wrong, if I give him the correct answers before he post the grades should I get a score of 100%?

This is how all degrees are earned at FIU; so yes, you can.

(05-20-2018 12:08 PM)thefaU Wrote:  

(05-20-2018 11:44 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  Quick question: my professor tells me I got half the questions wrong, if I give him the correct answers before he post the grades should I get a score of 100%?

This is how all degrees are earned at FIU; so yes, you can.

haha i think you are talking about FAU, the one we will end the year 2-1 against.

(05-20-2018 11:51 AM)Ragu Wrote:  

(05-20-2018 11:44 AM)FIU4Ever Wrote:  

(05-20-2018 10:08 AM)Ragu Wrote:  If you have updated info before running the story, your story is indeed inaccurate. That's common sense. Mistakes are made for initial stories a lot. If you have new and real info and you ignore it, then that's irresponsible and false reporting

You guys went from proclaiming big title ix violations to talking about if initial info provided was wrong though. So that's indeed hilarious

Hopefully La Tech can stay within 4 scores in this years game

Quick question: my professor tells me I got half the questions wrong, if I give him the correct answers before he post the grades should I get a score of 100%?

That's apples and oranges

A test is done once you take it. There are no updates. It's cut and dry if you got it right or wrong

With stories in publication , if the facts or figures provided initially are wrong it can be updated. And this guy had the info before publication

Similarly if a story is false or update after publication you can print a retraction

But nice try

Don't think it is a big deal, but y'all making it a big deal by shooting the messenger. The guy found an error which got through all the AD checks and balances. This is an opportunity to fix that. Y'all had a problem with Title IX last year so I assume plans were in place to address it. Someone should be checking on the effectiveness of the plan catch errors in the report.

We have had our share of investigative reporting from the hearld so I understand what y'all going through right now.