(04-25-2018 06:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah. So if they are linking them as extreme right they are right of Hitler.

Godwins Law. Not bad though, you did wait until almost the end of the first page of posts.

(04-24-2018 07:37 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bomb...4-million/

And still not my President.

(04-25-2018 06:27 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(04-25-2018 06:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah. So if they are linking them as extreme right they are right of Hitler.

Really Mach. The Hitler defense?

Takes one to know one? All the brownshirt activities came from the left.

(04-25-2018 06:27 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(04-25-2018 06:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah. So if they are linking them as extreme right they are right of Hitler.

Really Mach. The Hitler defense?

That comes out when they have nothing else.

(04-25-2018 06:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah. So if they are linking them as extreme right they are right of Hitler.

Hitler was really a combination of right and left. Right military and foreign relations, left domestic policy.

Neocons are kind of a less extreme version of fascists, big government plus nationalism.

(04-25-2018 08:15 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-25-2018 06:27 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(04-25-2018 06:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah. So if they are linking them as extreme right they are right of Hitler.

Really Mach. The Hitler defense?

That comes out when they have nothing else.

Yep. That and the race card.

Here's the Washington Bezos Post "ignoring" this story when it first came out back in December.

Quote:In the complaint, the Committee to Defend the President asked the FEC to determine whether the defeated Democrat engaged in “unprecedented, massive, nationwide multimillion-dollar conspiracy” to allow large donors to spread more money around. The “conspiracy,” however, may have simply taken advantage of new loopholes in campaign finance law — loopholes expanded after a Supreme Court victory by the lawyer who filed the new complaint.

In the end, it was very realistic. In 2016, Clinton’s campaign created a Hillary Victory Fund — a joint fundraising committee — that allowed the candidate to raise money for both her campaign and 32 state parties at the same time. Donald Trump’s campaign did the same, albeit with fewer state parties. During the campaign, neither move courted much controversy.

Wait...what was that again?

Quote:The “conspiracy,” however, may have simply taken advantage of new loopholes in campaign finance law — loopholes expanded after a Supreme Court victory by the lawyer who filed the new complaint.

And what else was that?

Quote:Donald Trump’s campaign did the same, albeit with fewer state parties.

What's behind the claim that Hillary Clinton got '$84 million of potentially illegal campaign contributions?'

Pavlov Dog’s clickbait for them Tom.

(04-25-2018 06:15 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(04-25-2018 05:48 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

Try linking to something without an extreme right bias and maybe just maybe you will get a lib to comment. Your track record on posting things that never come to fruition is stellar shere.

Thought that site was fake news... Your words not mine...

https://csnbbs.com/thread-842695-post-15...id15071848

Got eeeeem

(02-13-2018 03:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Media bias fact check is a fake news site. Either biased or incompetent.

https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bia...dishonest/

(04-26-2018 01:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's the Washington Bezos Post "ignoring" this story when it first came out back in December.

Quote:In the complaint, the Committee to Defend the President asked the FEC to determine whether the defeated Democrat engaged in “unprecedented, massive, nationwide multimillion-dollar conspiracy” to allow large donors to spread more money around. The “conspiracy,” however, may have simply taken advantage of new loopholes in campaign finance law — loopholes expanded after a Supreme Court victory by the lawyer who filed the new complaint.

In the end, it was very realistic. In 2016, Clinton’s campaign created a Hillary Victory Fund — a joint fundraising committee — that allowed the candidate to raise money for both her campaign and 32 state parties at the same time. Donald Trump’s campaign did the same, albeit with fewer state parties. During the campaign, neither move courted much controversy.

Wait...what was that again?

Quote:The “conspiracy,” however, may have simply taken advantage of new loopholes in campaign finance law — loopholes expanded after a Supreme Court victory by the lawyer who filed the new complaint.

And what else was that?

Quote:Donald Trump’s campaign did the same, albeit with fewer state parties.

What's behind the claim that Hillary Clinton got '$84 million of potentially illegal campaign contributions?'

wapo, didnt click fake news