Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Take UNC and UVA... please!
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,727
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1392
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #1
Take UNC and UVA... please!
Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.
04-20-2018 02:45 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


BePcr07 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,900
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 342
I Root For: Boise St & Zags
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
SEC + Virginia, North Carolina, Duke, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, TCU
ACC + Texas, Texas Tech, West Virginia, Kansas, Kansas St, Iowa St, Cincinnati, Memphis, Houston
04-20-2018 08:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 37,901
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7737
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

You and I were talking about equitable value the other day. And while there is some jest here, the simple truth is those would be the best schools for the ACC to get rid of but for slightly different reasons.

And what is mentioned below your post doesn't miss the mark by far. If a true trade was to occur that would cement the ACC clearly in the top 3 if not top two conferences then trading Duke and UNC along with Virginia to the SEC who then could add T.C.U. to the West and pick up Kansas, and Oklahoma State would give us a grouping that we would be academically happy about from the ACC, plus Kansas, and would give us the penetration and presence in DFW that we want market wise (OSU/TCU).

The the ACC could do the following:

Add West Virginia and Notre Dame in full.

And add Texas, Baylor, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and Iowa State.

Add Cincinnati

So now your conference would look like this:

Cincinnati, Iowa State, Louisville, Pittsburgh, West Virginia

Boston College, Syracuse, N.C. State, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech

Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Miami, Wake Forest

Baylor, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech

This does amplify your football value and profile.

Now you likely have division champs that include Louisville/West Virginia, Notre Dame/Virginia Tech, Clemson/F.S.U., Texas/Oklahoma.

With those likely pairings the ACC semis and finals go through the roof in value.

What it does for the SEC is equally good.

Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia

Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State

Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, T.C.U.

Auburn, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Vanderbilt

Now our set up rebuilds the Tennessee brand for football and the likely winner of that division could well be Tennessee or North Carolina, followed by Alabama/L.S.U., followed by Texas A&M/T.C.U./Oklahoma State, followed by Auburn/Florida/Georgia.

That too tremendously enhances the values of our Semis.

Now that could work well for both conferences and the ACC in particular because now you are rid of the old cadre that has held football back.
(This post was last modified: 04-20-2018 12:13 PM by JRsec.)
04-20-2018 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
USAFMEDIC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,914
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 189
I Root For: MIZZOU/FSU/USM
Location: Biloxi, MS
Post: #4
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 12:12 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

You and I were talking about equitable value the other day. And while there is some jest here, the simple truth is those would be the best schools for the ACC to get rid of but for slightly different reasons.

And what is mentioned below your post doesn't miss the mark by far. If a true trade was to occur that would cement the ACC clearly in the top 3 if not top two conferences then trading Duke and UNC along with Virginia to the SEC who then could add T.C.U. to the West and pick up Kansas, and Oklahoma State would give us a grouping that we would be academically happy about from the ACC, plus Kansas, and would give us the penetration and presence in DFW that we want market wise (OSU/TCU).

The the ACC could do the following:

Add West Virginia and Notre Dame in full.

And add Texas, Baylor, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and Iowa State.

Add Cincinnati

So now your conference would look like this:

Cincinnati, Iowa State, Louisville, Pittsburgh, West Virginia

Boston College, Syracuse, N.C. State, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech

Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Miami, Wake Forest

Baylor, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech

This does amplify your football value and profile.

Now you likely have division champs that include Louisville/West Virginia, Notre Dame/Virginia Tech, Clemson/F.S.U., Texas/Oklahoma.

With those likely pairings the ACC semis and finals go through the roof in value.

What it does for the SEC is equally good.

Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia

Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State

Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, T.C.U.

Auburn, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Vanderbilt

Now our set up rebuilds the Tennessee brand for football and the likely winner of that division could well be Tennessee or North Carolina, followed by Alabama/L.S.U., followed by Texas A&M/T.C.U./Oklahoma State, followed by Auburn/Florida/Georgia.

That too tremendously enhances the values of our Semis.

Now that could work well for both conferences and the ACC in particular because now you are rid of the old cadre that has held football back.

04-bow That would be some nice balanced conferences.
04-20-2018 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,233
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 762
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #5
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

If UVa and Carolina ever leave the ACC, it will be with Duke and Georgia Tech and the four of will be headed to the B1G.
04-20-2018 04:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,233
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 762
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #6
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

BTW, Mark, VT might need to start worrying about its own status . There seems to be some new evidence to suggest that it wasn't NC State (which we expect and can accept) but Virginia Tech that was the ringleader in keeping our situation stirred up with the NCAA.
04-21-2018 01:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AllTideUp Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,154
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 559
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-21-2018 01:17 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

BTW, Mark, VT might need to start worrying about its own status . There seems to be some new evidence to suggest that it wasn't NC State (which we expect and can accept) but Virginia Tech that was the ringleader in keeping our situation stirred up with the NCAA.

Why would VT worry about its status?

As if the SEC wouldn't embrace them with open arms...
04-21-2018 01:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,727
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1392
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #8
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-21-2018 01:17 PM)XLance Wrote:  ...There seems to be some new evidence to suggest that it wasn't NC State (which we expect and can accept) but Virginia Tech that was the ringleader in keeping our situation stirred up with the NCAA.

News to me. I'm not aware of any reason VT would even care about that...
04-21-2018 04:05 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
murrdcu Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,969
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 144
I Root For: Arkansas
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-21-2018 01:17 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

BTW, Mark, VT might need to start worrying about its own status . There seems to be some new evidence to suggest that it wasn't NC State (which we expect and can accept) but Virginia Tech that was the ringleader in keeping our situation stirred up with the NCAA.

So VT was tired of you cheating in basketball? Can’t blame them. Also, I wonder who spilled the beans on Kansas?
04-21-2018 05:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


murrdcu Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,969
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 144
I Root For: Arkansas
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 12:12 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

You and I were talking about equitable value the other day. And while there is some jest here, the simple truth is those would be the best schools for the ACC to get rid of but for slightly different reasons.

And what is mentioned below your post doesn't miss the mark by far. If a true trade was to occur that would cement the ACC clearly in the top 3 if not top two conferences then trading Duke and UNC along with Virginia to the SEC who then could add T.C.U. to the West and pick up Kansas, and Oklahoma State would give us a grouping that we would be academically happy about from the ACC, plus Kansas, and would give us the penetration and presence in DFW that we want market wise (OSU/TCU).

The the ACC could do the following:

Add West Virginia and Notre Dame in full.

And add Texas, Baylor, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and Iowa State.

Add Cincinnati

So now your conference would look like this:

Cincinnati, Iowa State, Louisville, Pittsburgh, West Virginia

Boston College, Syracuse, N.C. State, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech

Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Miami, Wake Forest

Baylor, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech

This does amplify your football value and profile.

Now you likely have division champs that include Louisville/West Virginia, Notre Dame/Virginia Tech, Clemson/F.S.U., Texas/Oklahoma.

With those likely pairings the ACC semis and finals go through the roof in value.

What it does for the SEC is equally good.

Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia

Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State

Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, T.C.U.

Auburn, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Vanderbilt

Now our set up rebuilds the Tennessee brand for football and the likely winner of that division could well be Tennessee or North Carolina, followed by Alabama/L.S.U., followed by Texas A&M/T.C.U./Oklahoma State, followed by Auburn/Florida/Georgia.

That too tremendously enhances the values of our Semis.

Now that could work well for both conferences and the ACC in particular because now you are rid of the old cadre that has held football back.
Sec at 20? If that’s the case, I could see the SEC pushing for Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and North Carolina....probably Texas too.
04-21-2018 05:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 37,901
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7737
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-21-2018 05:58 PM)murrdcu Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 12:12 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

You and I were talking about equitable value the other day. And while there is some jest here, the simple truth is those would be the best schools for the ACC to get rid of but for slightly different reasons.

And what is mentioned below your post doesn't miss the mark by far. If a true trade was to occur that would cement the ACC clearly in the top 3 if not top two conferences then trading Duke and UNC along with Virginia to the SEC who then could add T.C.U. to the West and pick up Kansas, and Oklahoma State would give us a grouping that we would be academically happy about from the ACC, plus Kansas, and would give us the penetration and presence in DFW that we want market wise (OSU/TCU).

The the ACC could do the following:

Add West Virginia and Notre Dame in full.

And add Texas, Baylor, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Kansas State, and Iowa State.

Add Cincinnati

So now your conference would look like this:

Cincinnati, Iowa State, Louisville, Pittsburgh, West Virginia

Boston College, Syracuse, N.C. State, Notre Dame, Virginia Tech

Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Miami, Wake Forest

Baylor, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech

This does amplify your football value and profile.

Now you likely have division champs that include Louisville/West Virginia, Notre Dame/Virginia Tech, Clemson/F.S.U., Texas/Oklahoma.

With those likely pairings the ACC semis and finals go through the roof in value.

What it does for the SEC is equally good.

Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia

Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana State, Mississippi, Mississippi State

Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, T.C.U.

Auburn, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Vanderbilt

Now our set up rebuilds the Tennessee brand for football and the likely winner of that division could well be Tennessee or North Carolina, followed by Alabama/L.S.U., followed by Texas A&M/T.C.U./Oklahoma State, followed by Auburn/Florida/Georgia.

That too tremendously enhances the values of our Semis.

Now that could work well for both conferences and the ACC in particular because now you are rid of the old cadre that has held football back.
Sec at 20? If that’s the case, I could see the SEC pushing for Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, and North Carolina....probably Texas too.

Not exactly. It's what division of the Big 12 would be possible if UNC, UVa, and Duke weren't afraid of losing control of their conference. The solution depicted here is to move those three so that growth can happen in the ACC without rancor.
04-21-2018 06:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 37,901
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7737
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 04:32 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

If UVa and Carolina ever leave the ACC, it will be with Duke and Georgia Tech and the four of will be headed to the B1G.

Three basketball schools and a broke fixer upper? Yeah that'll fly.
04-21-2018 11:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
UNC and UVA are the prime adds the SEC needs over anyone else and filling in the last major hole in the SEC footprint.

And if we needed to, we could and should bring Duke and VT as well and hey, grab FSU and Clemson just to secure the brands we need

SEC West

Texas A&M, Louisiana State, Arkansas, Ole Miss, Missouri

SEC Central

Miss State, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee, Kentucky

SEC South

Florida, Florida State, South Carolina, Clemson, Georgia

SEC North

North Carolina, Duke, Vanderbilt, Virginia, Virginia Tech

9 game Everyone plays the 4 other teams in their division, 2 protected annual games to maintain old rivalries like Tennessee-Florida and other newer ones like North Carolina-South Carolina then 3 rotating games in each of other 3 divisions
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2018 09:49 AM by 10thMountain.)
04-22-2018 07:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


The Grassy Nole Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 164
Joined: Apr 2018
Reputation: 45
I Root For: FSU & Ohio U
Location: The Aug
Post: #14
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
As much as I would love a lot of these scenarios being played out, I don't see the Carolina\UVA mafia playing along to this. I feel there is a higher probability of UVA, Duke, & UNC staying behind in a demoted ACC (for football but Power level for all other sports) with the ACC "non-desirables" while the B1G and SEC pick up the valuables. Granted I don't believe any of this will happen for a few reasons:

1.) ESPN will want to keep their property alive
2.) The SEC needs the ACC as a buffer from the B1G
3.) State politics causing schools to stay put\together
4.) Amount of money necessary for these moves will probably be massive\ not worth it because of GoR in place
5.) Conferences will essentially become leagues, how will they make it work realistically (they won't add extra games to the schedule)
6.) Chookity Bock!
04-23-2018 01:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 37,901
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7737
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-23-2018 01:32 PM)The Grassy Nole Wrote:  As much as I would love a lot of these scenarios being played out, I don't see the Carolina\UVA mafia playing along to this. I feel there is a higher probability of UVA, Duke, & UNC staying behind in a demoted ACC (for football but Power level for all other sports) with the ACC "non-desirables" while the B1G and SEC pick up the valuables. Granted I don't believe any of this will happen for a few reasons:

1.) ESPN will want to keep their property alive
2.) The SEC needs the ACC as a buffer from the B1G
3.) State politics causing schools to stay put\together
4.) Amount of money necessary for these moves will probably be massive\ not worth it because of GoR in place
5.) Conferences will essentially become leagues, how will they make it work realistically (they won't add extra games to the schedule)
6.) Chookity Bock!

Of course, but it's the off season and news is slow........so......
04-23-2018 01:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
murrdcu Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,969
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 144
I Root For: Arkansas
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-20-2018 08:36 AM)BePcr07 Wrote:  SEC + Virginia, North Carolina, Duke, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Kansas
ACC + Texas, Texas Tech, West Virginia, TCU, Kansas St, Iowa St, Cincinnati, Memphis, Houston

Fifty

I think the restoration of Mizzou-KU and regionalism for KU would fit them and adding another academic school would help the sec. also, another blue blood in basketball doesn’t hurt
04-24-2018 10:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,233
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 762
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #17
RE: Take UNC and UVA... please!
(04-21-2018 11:37 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 04:32 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-20-2018 02:45 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Gets the SEC into (1) North Carolina and (2) Virginia... eliminates two mouths for the ACC football schools to feed*. Then perhaps the ACC could add (1) WVU, (2) Iowa St, (3) Kansas St, (4) TCU, (5) Texas and (6) Baylor, while the SEC adds (3) OU, (4) OSU, (5) Kansas and (6) Texas Tech. Both conferences at 20. DONE.

* I'd like to send Wake Forest and Duke but this is a theoretical, not a fantasy.

If UVa and Carolina ever leave the ACC, it will be with Duke and Georgia Tech and the four of will be headed to the B1G.

Three basketball schools and a broke fixer upper? Yeah that'll fly.

Well, they will give us our own "pod", pay us and leave us alone, plus it's a whole lot better than joining the SEC SEC SEC.
04-24-2018 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.