(04-17-2018 07:04 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL. There's a difference between calling him a 'friend' and disclosing a fiduciary relationship. Look you guys don't care what the fact based media says anyway. But still

BWAHAHAHAHA.

Yeah. The difference is called ‘a bill’.

Ok, so Hannity was taking gifts from people he was reporting on, doing so favorably to the giver, and not disclosing that fact.

Is that better?

(04-17-2018 08:22 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 07:04 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL. There's a difference between calling him a 'friend' and disclosing a fiduciary relationship. Look you guys don't care what the fact based media says anyway. But still

BWAHAHAHAHA.

Yeah. The difference is called ‘a bill’.

Ok, so Hannity was taking gifts from people he was reporting on, doing so favorably to the giver, and not disclosing that fact.

Is that better?

Are you truly that twisted or just trying your hardest to satisfy your desires.

No. It’s not better it’s ignorant.

(04-17-2018 08:22 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 07:04 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL. There's a difference between calling him a 'friend' and disclosing a fiduciary relationship. Look you guys don't care what the fact based media says anyway. But still

BWAHAHAHAHA.

Yeah. The difference is called ‘a bill’.

Ok, so Hannity was taking gifts from people he was reporting on, doing so favorably to the giver, and not disclosing that fact.

Is that better?

Legally speaking tom, what is required for a person to be considered a client buy a lawyer?

(04-17-2018 08:22 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 07:04 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(04-17-2018 03:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL. There's a difference between calling him a 'friend' and disclosing a fiduciary relationship. Look you guys don't care what the fact based media says anyway. But still

BWAHAHAHAHA.

Yeah. The difference is called ‘a bill’.

Ok, so Hannity was taking gifts from people he was reporting on, doing so favorably to the giver, and not disclosing that fact.

Is that better?

He did disclose it. He said he was a good friend. Im curious, when did Jake Tapper disclose he worked for years for the anti-gun lobby? Frankly, I dont think you really want to open this "disclosure" can of worms because virtually every mainstream national news anchor/reporter is married to, worked for, or served with a major Democratic player or organization. That's just one of the many reason the mainstream "news" reporting is so terribly biased and sounds like nothing more than thinly veiled rewrite of the Democratic Party "talking points for the day" morning email.

https://www.facebook.com/whitehousebrief...768780063/

A Clinton-Soros Minion is the Judge in Trump Lawyer's Case!

"The system is rigged and everybody knows it."

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/18/lets...ical-ties/

"...Two wrongs don’t make a right, but this double standard is overwhelming. Hannity makes his pro-Trump, pro-Cohen bias clear. Meanwhile, Jim Sciutto, George Stephanopoulos, Glenn Thrush, Mark Leibovich, and John Harwood pretend to be neutral players despite their ties to Democrats. If Hannity is going to face such scrutiny, so should these so-called “objective” journalists."

http://prospect.org/article/our-media-pr...an-hannity

If this type of thinking is the "American Prospect," we are in a world of trouble. Author considers Fox & Sinclair a threat to the republic because they don't tow the line as the MSM does. Doesn't seem to have a clue about her hypocrisy.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...my/558347/

The Atlantic, very left leaning, fears Democrats are barking up the wrong tree with their sleazy critics of Trump's sleaze. Stormy and Comey aren't helping.