Mach can't get through a single post without calling names and making derogatory comments about everyone that doesn't side with him.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...dnc-serve/

Ohhh that they didn't hand over the server.

Your premise here is wrong. Podesta had nothing to do with the DNC server because he didn’t work at the DNC; he worked for Clinton’s campaign. The DNC claimed they received no direct requests from the CIA, and the CIA did not comment.

The DNC says it cooperated with the FBI, providing information on the server through a third-party vendor.The FBI provided no comment, but then-FBI director Comey said it was an appropriate substitute.

Truth it matters people. When you base your arguments on things that are factually untrue expect the thrashing.

Now follow along. The DNC server is a ruse. A red herring. Podesta didn't work for the DNC.

In March 2016, the personal Gmail account of John Podesta, a former White House chief of staff and the chairman of Hillary Clinton's 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, was compromised in a data breach, and a collection of his emails, many of which were work-related, were stolen. Cybersecurity researchers as well as the United States government attributed responsibility for the breach, which was accomplished via a spear-phishing attack, to the hacking group Fancy Bear, allegedly affiliated with Russian intelligence services.[1]

Some or all of the Podesta emails were subsequently obtained by WikiLeaks, which published over 20,000 pages of emails, allegedly from Podesta, in October and November 2016.[2] Podesta and the Clinton campaign have declined to authenticate the emails.[3] Cybersecurity experts interviewed by PolitiFact believe the majority of emails are probably unaltered, while stating it is possible that the hackers inserted at least some doctored or fabricated emails into the collection.[4] An investigation by U.S. intelligence agencies reported that the files obtained by WikiLeaks during the U.S. election contained no "evident forgeries."[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_emails

Do you see how you guys are so easily manipulated? Damn near everything you post turns up factually wrong. Does this embarass any of you in the slightest? Why do you think Trump wants you to concentrate on the DNC server?

He'd be selling watches in Manhattan if he wasn't born into wealth or laundered money for the Russians.

(03-02-2018 01:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Truth it matters people. When you base your arguments on things that are factually untrue expect the thrashing.

Like a politically charged dossier?

That the FBI found credible....70% verified...... go on...... continue

(03-02-2018 01:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That the FBI found credible....70% verified...... go on...... continue

What did they find credible? What parts? Any real substance found credible?

I'm all for President Pence...

(03-02-2018 01:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That the FBI found credible....70% verified...... go on...... continue

Source, cause I can't find a single article that says the FBI verified 70% of the dossier.

Only mention I can find of 70% verified, is that Steele himself believes 70-90% of it is accurate.

(03-02-2018 12:50 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(03-02-2018 12:19 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's absolutely amazing to me you righties think the collusion was on the Dem side. THAT is the power of Faux News ladies and gentleman.

and this:

“If that F#%^ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!!!”

The ONE thing your ample gal got right the entire campaign. Lol

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-t...att-lauer/

You guys are pathetic and you don't post the truth. The mods are trying to clean the place up a bit. Please in the future fact check some of your stuff. Getting tired of going on Snopes and finding things posted on here as false.

Let me just play devil's advocate for a moment. Does the absence of evidence mean something didn't happen?

bumpity

(03-02-2018 01:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That the FBI found credible....70% verified...... go on...... continue

Wasn't the FBI. Again it's not a lie if you believe it.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-secur...dossier-is

(03-02-2018 01:46 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(03-02-2018 01:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That the FBI found credible....70% verified...... go on...... continue

Source, cause I can't find a single article that says the FBI verified 70% of the dossier.

Only mention I can find of 70% verified, is that Steele himself believes 70-90% of it is accurate.

We've went rounds on this. Before now it was that someone verified it. Now it's the FBi.

Fake news.

Mach's off the rails yet again.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

The CIA certainly gives it credibility.

Puhleaze GDunn...... you find a number then. I’ve seen 70%. Hardly fake. Like you like to say. Our govt finds it credible. You find a hard number.

Off the rails. Pot meet kettle

Hey who posted about the DNC server not being handed over? I thought it was this thread. I want to make sure I am eviscerating the right person. So many lies are posted on here it's hard to keep up. I'm not convinced that the people in here are liars but your news sources are and you just parrot them.
Two questions.

1. Are you embarrassed that you peddled lies?

2. What did you learn from it?

(03-02-2018 02:35 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Hey who posted about the DNC server not being handed over? I thought it was this thread. I want to make sure I am eviscerating the right person. So many lies are posted on here it's hard to keep up. I'm not convinced that the people in here are liars but your news sources are and you just parrot them.
Two questions.

1. Are you embarrassed that you peddled lies?

2. What did you learn from it?

James Comey in sworn testimony. that's who.

GDunn


What is great about this. You still can't find one part of the Dossier that has been proven false. I can cite article after article that desn't give one number but says many parts have been verified. I'm not going to play the copying and paste game with you every month. Let me know whenever you find one part that is fake.

What does the DNC server have to do with Podesta's emails being hacked? He didn't work for the DNC and it was a gmail account hacked.
Please continue

(03-02-2018 02:25 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

The CIA certainly gives it credibility.

OK, that is a good link and some good stuff in there.

It even mentions that the Russians were trying to get Anti-fracking measures passed in the US (a liberal platform).

Discusses that Putin had a personal gripe against Hillary, so he worked to discredit her.

I'll have to read more.

(03-02-2018 12:19 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's absolutely amazing to me you righties think the collusion was on the Dem side. THAT is the power of Faux News ladies and gentleman.

and this:

“If that F#%^ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!!!”

The ONE thing your ample gal got right the entire campaign. Lol

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-t...att-lauer/

You guys are pathetic and you don't post the truth. The mods are trying to clean the place up a bit. Please in the future fact check some of your stuff. Getting tired of going on Snopes and finding things posted on here as false.

I never said a word about her throwing a glass at a staffer...???

Though she does have a history of things like that. I do recall she heaved, I think it was a coffee pot at Bubba back at the start of the Lewinsky scandal and subsequent impeachment.

(03-02-2018 02:25 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

The CIA certainly gives it credibility.

Can you quote the part that says the dossier is 70% verfied by the FBI?