Amazing. We are already turning to excuses before the first snap. Based on the comments I have heard on this board, it doesn't matter what problems a team has, the coach's job is overcome them.
Way too many of you turned, by habit I guess, to explaining how Bailiff is worse than Bloom. Well, Bailiff is gone.
My only concern is the 2018 version of the Rice Owls. Too bad players X, Y, and Z won't be here. It is his job to get players A to W to perform at a level that produces wins. it is his job to put together players A thru W in to a team that wins. No excuses.
Judging from the comments here, he has a pretty low bar to clear.
I have no expectations of him taking us to the moon. But I do have hopes that he can make whatever players he has win at a greater rate than expected. I have hopes we will have less penalties from the players we have, less missed assignments, less dropped balls, etc. I have hopes that we will go into the last two minutes of every half with three TOs available. So far, just hopes, but come this fall, we shall see.
The one year comment was because some of you have made a point about posting every time some other school fires its coach after two or less years, the point being that we should be quicker on the trigger. Personally I think four years, plus or minus one, is a reasonable time to determine if the coach can do the job. But if you are one of the quick trigger advocates, can you keep your mouth shut if we go 0-13? 1-12? Or will you be making excuses, oh, he had the best players leave?
Save the excuses for after failure. Personally, I expect to see success. Because I think Bloom can do the job without the graduated seniors et al. It's his job. He took it on that basis. Sorry the rest of you lack the confidence to expect him to do well.