Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Nice Woodside Evaluation
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
indianasniff Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,842
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #1
Nice Woodside Evaluation
https://nflmocks.com/2018/02/09/logan-wo...ng-report/

Says a lot of nice things about Woodside

I will throw out a guess. Chiefs have a vacancy at QB with Smith trade
02-10-2018 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


NewMex RocketFan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,419
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 22
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Post: #2
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
Definitely NOT a runner!

Overall, a pretty decent evaluation.
02-10-2018 07:09 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PTLROCK Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,204
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 17
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
Chiefs picked up a nice QB last year. This is a nice review, and it seems pretty accurate. The video posted earlier of Diante Johnson did a nice job highlighting Logan’s ball placement and ability to make a lot of throws. Really accurate. The review mentioned the receivers were bad with a lot of drops. The last couple years drops have improved, but there were a number of drive stopping drops in Toledo losses. Ely’s Receivers dropped a ton of balls prior to Logan.
02-10-2018 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
H2Oville Rocket Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,396
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Toledo R0ckets
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
(02-10-2018 07:19 PM)PTLROCK Wrote:  Chiefs picked up a nice QB last year. This is a nice review, and it seems pretty accurate. The video posted earlier of Diante Johnson did a nice job highlighting Logan’s ball placement and ability to make a lot of throws. Really accurate. The review mentioned the receivers were bad with a lot of drops. The last couple years drops have improved, but there were a number of drive stopping drops in Toledo losses. Ely’s Receivers dropped a ton of balls prior to Logan.

Ely’s last year we had sooooo many drops. Disappointing because we had some big targets with speed.
02-10-2018 07:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Rocket75 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,984
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: Metro Toledo
Post: #5
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
I know one of the former UT receivers. He said the receivers preferred Woodside over Ely but the coaches liked Ely. Woodside was better at adjusting the speed and positioning of his throws. Ely simply threw bullets and the receivers were expected to make the catch even from close range.
02-11-2018 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pono Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,385
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 94
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
our receivers worst game was the miami game. and that was the one the scouts probably watched the most closely so obviously the perspective on the receivers will be skewed a bit. if our receivers were reliable all of that game we might have won. had a couple key drives killed by drops on potential 1st down throws.

woodside sure fits the backup qb ho in a few years can hold down the position should there be an injury mold. not the size, arm presence of a high draft pick, but has the ability, football IQ and approach to be a functional NFL QB once he learns the footwork playing under center.
02-11-2018 03:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
northcoastRocket Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,646
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 47
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
Completely silly to say he had "poor" receivers. Compare drops the past few seasons to the number of times receivers have toasted DBs and the number of times they have made catches most receivers wouldn't have - especially Thompson, DJohnson and Roberts. All in all, I think the receivers made waaay more plays to help Woodside than they did to hurt him.
02-11-2018 06:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


eastisbest Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,589
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 42
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
There's a tendency on this board to throw receiver's under the bus. Not sure why. If it's ALL the receivers, hint, it's not the receivers. This was the big point of disagreement over Ely. I got the feel so many had the hots for the "Alabama" transfer they couldn't see the ball repeatedly heading for the receivers hind quarters, where they used to be as they're on a full sprint the other way.

Woodside's accuracy in a huge variety of throws was evident. If there was a bad day, it was mostly likely his or the play callers, not 8 receivers.
02-12-2018 07:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Michigan Rocket Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 846
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
The evaluator said Woodside did NOT have any quality receivers to throw to. What team was he watching ? We had one of the best QB/WR combinations in the country.
02-15-2018 10:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FtLauderdaleRocket Offline
Yet Another Florida Rocket
*

Posts: 5,929
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Toledo
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Post: #10
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
(02-15-2018 10:57 AM)Michigan Rocket Wrote:  The evaluator said Woodside did NOT have any quality receivers to throw to. What team was he watching ? We had one of the best QB/WR combinations in the country.
I agree to a point......

Cody Thompson and Dionte Johnson are both above average.

The rest had A LOT of drops.
02-15-2018 03:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


MotoRocket Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,193
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation: 37
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
Dionte Johnson was inconsistent most of the year. A quality receiver is not only measured on ability to catch, but also on being able to consistently get some separation, not giving up on plays, not running the wrong routes, reading the defense the same as the QB so he knows how to adjust his route. I'm not saying he did all those, but I will say he did at least three of them at various times during the season, and sometimes all in one game. I saw more passes thrown that were not near anyone last year than the prior year. There were a lot of mix ups between QB and receivers.

It was a shame we did not have Cody Thompson for the entire season, but since we won the MACC, now I'm glad we have him back for another year - along with the Johnsons.
(This post was last modified: 02-15-2018 04:43 PM by MotoRocket.)
02-15-2018 04:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FtLauderdaleRocket Offline
Yet Another Florida Rocket
*

Posts: 5,929
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Toledo
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Post: #12
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
(02-15-2018 04:42 PM)MotoRocket Wrote:  Dionte Johnson was inconsistent most of the year. A quality receiver is not only measured on ability to catch, but also on being able to consistently get some separation, not giving up on plays, not running the wrong routes, reading the defense the same as the QB so he knows how to adjust his route. I'm not saying he did all those, but I will say he did at least three of them at various times during the season, and sometimes all in one game. I saw more passes thrown that were not near anyone last year than the prior year. There were a lot of mix ups between QB and receivers.

It was a shame we did not have Cody Thompson for the entire season, but since we won the MACC, now I'm glad we have him back for another year - along with the Johnsons.
Are you talking about Diontae Johnson or Jon'Vea Johnson? What you wrote applies to Jon'Vea.

Diontae had 6 games of 100 yards and really found his groove once Cody Thompson went down. He finished the season with 74 catches for 1278 yards and 13 TDs which are better numbers than Cody Thompson put up in a healthy 2016.

Jon'Vea had 42 catches for 689 yards and 5 TDs. I watched him drop ball after ball this season.
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2018 08:52 AM by FtLauderdaleRocket.)
02-16-2018 08:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MotoRocket Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,193
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation: 37
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
(02-16-2018 08:51 AM)FtLauderdaleRocket Wrote:  
(02-15-2018 04:42 PM)MotoRocket Wrote:  Dionte Johnson was inconsistent most of the year. A quality receiver is not only measured on ability to catch, but also on being able to consistently get some separation, not giving up on plays, not running the wrong routes, reading the defense the same as the QB so he knows how to adjust his route. I'm not saying he did all those, but I will say he did at least three of them at various times during the season, and sometimes all in one game. I saw more passes thrown that were not near anyone last year than the prior year. There were a lot of mix ups between QB and receivers.

It was a shame we did not have Cody Thompson for the entire season, but since we won the MACC, now I'm glad we have him back for another year - along with the Johnsons.
Are you talking about Diontae Johnson or Jon'Vea Johnson? What you wrote applies to Jon'Vea.

Diontae had 6 games of 100 yards and really found his groove once Cody Thompson went down. He finished the season with 74 catches for 1278 yards and 13 TDs which are better numbers than Cody Thompson put up in a healthy 2016.

Jon'Vea had 42 catches for 689 yards and 5 TDs. I watched him drop ball after ball this season.

Not at all. I watched Dionte make a number of mistakes and also watched as he and Woodside had a few words on the sideline when Woodside was motioning with his hands what he was supposed to run.

You are making comments about his stats, which are very good. They could have been even better. Thompson's may have been lower in the prior year - for the reason that Johnson was also there for the entire year. No question D.J. has some great physical attributes and great speed. He also made some great catches and had a superb YAC. I never criticized his ability to catch the ball and know what to do with it after the catch.

JonVea unquestionably was inconsistent and made a number of mistakes. I doubt either one of them would not admit they have some areas that need to be cleaned up. And now Woodside is gone - so you also lose that dynamic heading into 2018. Still, I can't imagine any defense in the MAC trying to figure out how they will defend Thompson, D.J., JVJ, Mitchell, and McKinley-Lewis along with Seymour/Thompkins/Sims; Fisher & Rosi, and likely a very good running QB in Guadagni - who showed signs in his limited play last year that he also has a decent arm. Have no idea how accurate he is or how composed he will be. I think he will do great.
02-16-2018 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


FtLauderdaleRocket Offline
Yet Another Florida Rocket
*

Posts: 5,929
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Toledo
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Post: #14
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
(02-15-2018 04:42 PM)MotoRocket Wrote:  Not at all. I watched Dionte make a number of mistakes and also watched as he and Woodside had a few words on the sideline when Woodside was motioning with his hands what he was supposed to run.

You are making comments about his stats, which are very good. They could have been even better. Thompson's may have been lower in the prior year - for the reason that Johnson was also there for the entire year. No question D.J. has some great physical attributes and great speed. He also made some great catches and had a superb YAC. I never criticized his ability to catch the ball and know what to do with it after the catch.

JonVea unquestionably was inconsistent and made a number of mistakes. I doubt either one of them would not admit they have some areas that need to be cleaned up. And now Woodside is gone - so you also lose that dynamic heading into 2018. Still, I can't imagine any defense in the MAC trying to figure out how they will defend Thompson, D.J., JVJ, Mitchell, and McKinley-Lewis along with Seymour/Thompkins/Sims; Fisher & Rosi, and likely a very good running QB in Guadagni - who showed signs in his limited play last year that he also has a decent arm. Have no idea how accurate he is or how composed he will be. I think he will do great.
OK, I watched every game on TV and I did not see any of those interactions between DJ and LW. I get where you are coming from now.
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2018 12:02 PM by FtLauderdaleRocket.)
02-16-2018 12:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PaulJ Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,047
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Nice Woodside Evaluation
and Woodside will be working out for NFL at the Combine this Saturday (March 3rd), can watch on NFL network or look for updates and highlights on web or social media as Combine gets widespread coverage these days
02-28-2018 10:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.