Quote:Susan Rice, who served as the National Security Adviser under President Obama, has been identified as the official who requested unmasking of incoming Trump officials, Cernovich Media can exclusively report.
Yeah, those names were then put in the presidential daily briefs for distribution within the administration and further distribution to the media. I imagine those Obama admin people were leaking names to their outside "attorneys". Worked for Comey.
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2018 02:32 PM by TechRocks.)
(02-03-2018 01:58 PM)Kronke Wrote: maggie haberman's story isn't "Holy sh*t, Trump was right, he was spied on.", it's "Who told Trump he was spied on?"
He had it nailed.
Damn.
So the President of the United States has better info than soy sipping limp wrists at the wapo.
(02-03-2018 01:58 PM)Kronke Wrote: maggie haberman's story isn't "Holy sh*t, Trump was right, he was spied on.", it's "Who told Trump he was spied on?"
He had it nailed.
Damn.
So the President of the United States has better info than soy sipping limp wrists at the wapo.
Snicker
They (the nyt, at least) had the info, they just didn't report it because it made obama look bad. Cerno scooped them.
But yes, your point remains.
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2018 02:21 PM by Kronke.)
Does anybody else see a pattern developing. Keep the underlings in a constant state of fervor. Over promise under deliver. The memo just came out yesterday. Flopped historically and within a day onto the next unsubstianted claim. Rinse repeat.
Here's the twitter link to it. Adam Schiff, in what may have been a freudian slip, referred to the memo release as a "fulsome attack on the FBI and DOJ." Fulsome is a somewhat obscure term, and one in which the different terms for the words contradicts themselves. But Schiff was probably referring to this definition:
The adjective fulsome can be defined as "unpleasantly and excessively suave or ingratiating in manner or speech." Historically, it has also meant "disgusting or offensive," or "copious or abundant."
The issue with that? The above image refers to an operation to surveil Trump Tower as operation Fulsome. In other words, did Schiff utilize a term very few have heard about because he is aware of the term due to the Trump Surveillance operation which had the same name?
Here's the twitter link to it. Adam Schiff, in what may have been a freudian slip, referred to the memo release as a "fulsome attack on the FBI and DOJ." Fulsome is a somewhat obscure term, and one in which the different terms for the words contradicts themselves. But Schiff was probably referring to this definition:
The adjective fulsome can be defined as "unpleasantly and excessively suave or ingratiating in manner or speech." Historically, it has also meant "disgusting or offensive," or "copious or abundant."
The issue with that? The above image refers to an operation to surveil Trump Tower as operation Fulsome. In other words, did Schiff utilize a term very few have heard about because he is aware of the term due to the Trump Surveillance operation which had the same name?
Here's the twitter link to it. Adam Schiff, in what may have been a freudian slip, referred to the memo release as a "fulsome attack on the FBI and DOJ." Fulsome is a somewhat obscure term, and one in which the different terms for the words contradicts themselves. But Schiff was probably referring to this definition:
The adjective fulsome can be defined as "unpleasantly and excessively suave or ingratiating in manner or speech." Historically, it has also meant "disgusting or offensive," or "copious or abundant."
The issue with that? The above image refers to an operation to surveil Trump Tower as operation Fulsome. In other words, did Schiff utilize a term very few have heard about because he is aware of the term due to the Trump Surveillance operation which had the same name?
Yea, whether or not this particular image is true or not I dont know. Its just interesting that Schiff referred to the term of the operation to describe the memo release.
(02-03-2018 02:41 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Does anybody else see a pattern developing. Keep the underlings in a constant state of fervor. Over promise under deliver. The memo just came out yesterday. Flopped historically and within a day onto the next unsubstianted claim. Rinse repeat.
Thernovich....... exthellent
Do you make a habit of mocking people with disabilities?
We also haven't moved on. The memo has to do with FISA abuse, and this claim has to do with susan rice, the great unmasker, and how she abused FISA.
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2018 03:16 PM by Kronke.)
(02-03-2018 02:41 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Does anybody else see a pattern developing. Keep the underlings in a constant state of fervor. Over promise under deliver. The memo just came out yesterday. Flopped historically and within a day onto the next unsubstianted claim. Rinse repeat.
Thernovich....... exthellent
Does the pattern developing involve you constantly coming unhinged, making all sorts of wild accusations, and never providing backup?
WTF is this and where did it come from? I assume the Brits? Were they doing the wiretapping? Im very confused.
I'm not sure, but its trending on twitter because Schiff mentioned the operational name when referring to the memo, which has caused people to go hmmmmmmm.
Below is the video where, at about the 4 minute mark, Schiff refers to the memo release as a Fulsome attack. (Which is the name of the British operation)
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2018 04:04 PM by UofMstateU.)
Fo- read this article. You may not trust the WAPO, but I do. I believe the article and I do not believe Nunes or the oithers trying to discredit a perfectly legal investigation.
![[Image: DVDS3FhWsAAglqP.jpg:large]](http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVDS3FhWsAAglqP.jpg:large)
![[Image: colmodels3.jpg]](http://www.romancelatina.com/images/colmodels3.jpg)
