(02-03-2018 08:05 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  The real story here is that there's now enough evidence of O's weaponizing of the DOJ, FBI, and IRS, that almost anything's believable.

Remember, even though it sounds outrageous, they believed Queen Hillary would reign for 8 years. There was a lot a stake.....including nooses around their geeky pencil-necks.

Quintessential Chicago politics and I guess typical of someone that follows Rules for Radicals.

Good lord - he was an awful president. Easily the worst of my lifetime.

Amazes me that there are still those that think he was good. Guess those are the ones that want everyone to live the same - to bad that means everyone is equally miserable.

(02-04-2018 12:26 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 02:41 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Does anybody else see a pattern developing. Keep the underlings in a constant state of fervor. Over promise under deliver. The memo just came out yesterday. Flopped historically and within a day onto the next unsubstianted claim. Rinse repeat.

Thernovich....... exthellent

Tried to tell you the memo was the tip of the iceberg. MUCH MUCH more to come.

I hate Obama so much that I'd give Mach's left nut, heck, I might even give my own left nut for that to be true. What a scandal of epic proportions that would be.

(02-03-2018 06:29 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 06:06 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 06:05 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Im calling fabrics on this. I can't imagine the Brits being so sloppy as to allowing this to be leaked.

I know, right?. Its almost too awful to be real.

The Brits, Aussies, and US have been said to spy on each others citizens for each other for a long time in order to bypass their legal prohibitions. So the story isn't shocking or new.

But no evidence other than the involvement of Steele points to this in Trump's case. And this doc looks sketchy.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

I assume this is correct because it seems like something that any gov't would pursue. I never seen this statement taken as fact though but I bet it is. Having said that, I bet most Americans never thought about the U.S. gov't asking British and Australian intelligence agencies to spy on our own citizens because it's against the law for the CIA to do it. THIS would be a big story if the news outlets would run with it at the same time.

IMHO, this would outrage more Americans than anything being written about Trump concerning allegations of collusion, obstruction, working with Russians, etc.

(02-03-2018 08:00 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm not sure this is 100% legit. As much as I dislike Schiff I doubt he's that stupid. I have been known to be wrong on occasion.

A lot of senators and house reps are idiots. It would not surprise me at all if something like this WOULD happen.

(02-03-2018 11:34 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Oh

http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywoo...story.html


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Nice find...very interesting.

(02-03-2018 06:23 PM)HCJag Wrote:  Is this a joke? Christopher Steele was ex-Mi6, right? The only Michael Steele I can remember is in the RNC.

Good catch. This is Fabrics.

(02-04-2018 10:39 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 06:23 PM)HCJag Wrote:  Is this a joke? Christopher Steele was ex-Mi6, right? The only Michael Steele I can remember is in the RNC.

Good catch. This is Fabrics.

That is mentioned in the link I provided. This particular document may have been "faked" to try to match what was reported nearly a year ago. However, what is interesting is Schiff's use of the operational term in his discussion about the memo release. That is why Fulsome starting trending again recently.

(02-03-2018 08:00 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm not sure this is 100% legit. As much as I dislike Schiff I doubt he's that stupid. I have been known to be wrong on occasion.

Notice that something like this against Trump and the resident liberals would be splashing it all over the board as fact. With this the conservatives are showing a lot of skepticism and critical thinking.

The fact that Schiff used the word "fulsome" means about as much as all of those things they keep finding in Mars photos.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

(02-04-2018 11:28 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 08:00 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm not sure this is 100% legit. As much as I dislike Schiff I doubt he's that stupid. I have been known to be wrong on occasion.

Notice that something like this against Trump and the resident liberals would be splashing it all over the board as fact. With this the conservatives are showing a lot of skepticism and critical thinking.

Well we don't own fake news so there's that.

(02-04-2018 11:09 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-04-2018 10:39 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(02-03-2018 06:23 PM)HCJag Wrote:  Is this a joke? Christopher Steele was ex-Mi6, right? The only Michael Steele I can remember is in the RNC.

Good catch. This is Fabrics.

That is mentioned in the link I provided. This particular document may have been "faked" to try to match what was reported nearly a year ago. However, what is interesting is Schiff's use of the operational term in his discussion about the memo release. That is why Fulsome starting trending again recently.

Hard to believe Obama would have had anything to do with surveillance of Trump AFTER he was elected.........I can easily believe he'd have been tempted in the run-up to the election because NOBODY (other than a few brave souls here and on other similar websites) predicted a Trump win.

Afterall, virtually anything Obama knew as president, would eventually be known by Trump one way or another once it was clear he was president-elect.

Now, having said all that, if Obama thought there was clear evidence of some sinister Trump plot to hand America over to the Russians, then maybe. Of course, only a few wingnuts here at this, and other similar sites believe such a thing.