The tactic of using attorney-client privilege to shield potentially illegal communications from law enforcement scrutiny is not a new one. During the FBI investigation of then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s potential mishandling of classified information, Cheryl Mills, one of Clinton’s top government aides at the State Department, also claimed that she could not testify about her communications with Clinton on the matter because she was also serving as Clinton’s personal attorney.

“I have nothing to say about any of this,” Richman responded, when asked directly whether attorney-client privilege was being asserted in order to shield his communications with Comey regarding the deliberate leaking of classified documents to the media.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/23/come...-attorney/

Theres more obstruction in that one action by Comey than anything the Muller investigation has produced

(01-25-2018 06:37 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Theres more obstruction in that one action by Comey than anything the Muller investigation has produced

I’m afraid you are spot on.

(01-25-2018 12:30 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 06:37 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Theres more obstruction in that one action by Comey than anything the Muller investigation has produced

I’m afraid you are spot on.

why?

I'll have zero sympathy for that tampon....

the bureau itself isn't the problem....

it's the dayum sheeples at the top.....

tarnishing the agency's image has already become 'mission accomplished' due to 'those' long ago.....

it's up to the oversight committee to figure this one out (in permanence).....

that should be the concern......

(01-25-2018 03:14 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  The tactic of using attorney-client privilege to shield potentially illegal communications from law enforcement scrutiny is not a new one. During the FBI investigation of then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s potential mishandling of classified information, Cheryl Mills, one of Clinton’s top government aides at the State Department, also claimed that she could not testify about her communications with Clinton on the matter because she was also serving as Clinton’s personal attorney.

“I have nothing to say about any of this,” Richman responded, when asked directly whether attorney-client privilege was being asserted in order to shield his communications with Comey regarding the deliberate leaking of classified documents to the media.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/23/come...-attorney/

and Comey self righteously quotes the bible and presents himself as a pillar of ethics... what a turd...